Visitors from around the World

Translate blog:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Announcements

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

facebook: Discerning the World

Sign up to Receive Email Updates


powered by MailChimp!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Recent Comments

General Comments Section:

Click here for the General Comments Section Discerning the World - General Conversation Section

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Article Archive

Click here to find a List of all Articles List of all Articles
Click here to find a List of all Categories to search by Categories / Keywords

Website Stats

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Charlie Hebdo Attack – Analysis

Charlie Hebdo Attack - Analysis

Charlie HebdoCharlie Hebdo Attack in France

Charlie Hedbo terrorist attack – France is one of Islam’s greatest appeasers. France controlled several Islamic countries in the days of their African empire. Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Sudan, Guinea, Niger, Mauritania, Gambia Ivory Coast and Libya were all under French control.  For all its official rhetoric, France has done precious little to stem the growing tide of Jew-hatred and anti-Israelism that has gripped that country.

Mass emigration of French Jewry, prompted primarily by French Islamists, is met with muted response and inaction by French officials who appear either indifferent to their plight or at a loss to devise a coherent strategy to effectively deal with the phenomena.

Since the mid-1960s, the French, motivated partly out of greed, partly out of a need to needle the United States and partly out of genuine dislike for the Mideast’s only democracy, have done everything in their power to appease tyranny rather than fight it, to prop it up rather than obliterate it.

In May 1967 France was the first Western power to unilaterally impose an arms embargo on Israel at a precarious time when Israel was facing existential threats from its Arab neighbours. From Iraq to Algeria, frenzied Arab mobs stoked by their respective venal governments burned effigies of Jews in the streets to chants of Itbach al-Yahud, “slaughter the Jews!”

The world watched with feigned concern as hundreds of thousands of Arabs soldiers backed by modern Soviet T-55 tanks and Mig fighter jets converged on Israel’s borders. The French, chose to abandon and betray the Jewish State in a transparent effort to curry favour with the Muslim world. The French sold their morality for oil and a few Francs.

It has been rumoured that Nicolas Sarcozy  was funded by Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi in his presidential campaign.

France is a humanistic secular state. God has no legal place in France, and this is clearly demonstrated by Charlie Hebdo Magazine. The magazine was run by Atheist Activists and made a mockery of anyone’s religion which to their cost included Islam.

Not all French agree with the magazine’s methods and philosophy, but almost all of them are now rallying to the side of these spiritually perverse men who hate God with a venomous passion. The editor of the magazine  Stéphane “Charb” Charbonnier’s declared…

‘‘I am not afraid of reprisals. I don’t have kids, I don’t have a wife, I don’t have a car, I don’t have credit. This may sound a bit pompous but I would prefer to die standing than to live on my knees.’’ Prophetic words? It turns out that “Charb” was standing up when he was shot and killed.

More importantly is what “Charb” meant by his comment.

What he meant was that he would never bow his knee to any god especially the God of the Bible. Unfortunately for him his humanistic atheistic pride WILL indeed one day bow before the King of kings and the Lord of lords.

It is terrible to fall into the hands of the Almighty God.

What is even more poetic is that the godless gang  at “Charlie” all came to a knowledge of the truth at the same time. All of them believe now.

What do I mean by that? I mean that they believe the same as the rich man of Lazarus fame does. It is destined for a man once to die; thereafter the judgement. These men, the terrorists included were not fans of the Living God of the Bible, but NOW they believe.

Too late to do anything about it except wait for the day of judgement of the wicked dead.

The media is touting the event as an attack on freedom. Mmm. In the secular humanistic atheist mind “freedom” is a relative term. One man’s meat is another man’s poison.

There is only one place where we as humans can know true freedom, and that is in Christ.

The secular version of freedom is a Nitrous Oxide (Laughing Gas) experience.

It makes one feel good for a while and it even dulls the pain, but in the end nothing has changed. We remain shackled to our weaknesses and our fears.

In Christianity we are taught and instructed to love our enemies; to pray for those who use us; to do good to those who are ugly to us.

In Islam there is no such sentiment and this was “Charlie’s” mistake. In mocking Christianity the magazine picked on a soft lumbering target. A target with a mindset of forgiveness, tolerance and restitution.

In the Quran however there is not a single verse of instruction to love anything. There are many verses that instruct the Muslim to make war and kill the “Infidel.”

The Western myth of the “Religion of Peace” is appeasement at best and in many cases it is treason.

Is it right to condone this mass murder? I think it depends who you are asking.

What these murderers did they did in obedience to the Quran. (This is an undisputable fact and I challenge you to check for yourself.)

Cf. Surah 2: 190 – 193

Surah 9: 5

Surah 9: 28, 29

Surah 9: 123

The above references are accompanied by many others in the Quran.  Do not believe the mealy mouth politicians who tell you otherwise, they have an agenda that does not include your safety or wellbeing.

Often the Crusaders are thrown into the argument to justify terror and murder.

The problem with this line of argument is that the Crusaders were killing in disobedience to the Bible whereas the Muslims were doing the same in obedience to the Quran.

France’s duplicitous foreign policies when it came to appeasing two-bit Arab dictators only went from bad to worse.  They helped Saddam Hussein construct an atom bomb plant and supplied the tyrant with massive quantities of Mirage fighter jets, missiles, tanks and artillery. For those who need reminding, this is the same chap who paid lavish sums to the families of Palestinian homicide bombers, who threatened to “burn half of Israel” and employed chemical weapons against his own people.

Rather than fighting and combating Islamic terrorists, the French have a nasty habit of paying them off. They released frozen Iranian assets in exchange for cessation of Iranian-backed terror attacks against France and paid Palestinian groups protection money in an effort to spare their commercial airliners from the scourge of Palestinian skyjackings.

France’s abominable foreign policy reared its ugly head yet again when on December 30, it backed a Palestinian resolution at the UN Security Council that imposed dictates on Israel, compelling the Jewish State to withdraw to pre-1967 borders – borders which Israel’s former UN ambassador, Abba Ebban, perceptively termed “Auschwitz lines“– without addressing Israel’s security needs and territorial claims. The one-sided resolution also gave implicit recognition to the notion that millions of “Palestinian refugees” would be allowed to flood Israel, effectively ending the Jewish character of the state.

The Charlie Hebdo attack is a display of hatred.

Hatred for anyone who does not agree with Islam. On the other hand the victims hated just as much. In their zeal to mock God, they attacked the Catholic Church, Islam and anyone who believed in a god. Their hatred was matched with hatred, and the result is that the enemies of the God of the Bible are fighting and killing each other in a war of hatred and ignorance.

Ignorance because “Charlie” thought that the Catholic Church represents the God of the Bible, and that Allah is the same God as the God of the Bible.

Personally, I believe that the 12 killed in the “Charlie” attack are now believers in the redemptive plan of God through the blood of Jesus Christ on the Cross at Calvary.

All in all the world is in a humanistic mess and it is going to get much worse before it gets better.

More...

14 comments to Charlie Hebdo Attack – Analysis

  • Gerhard Bouwer

    Thank you for putting perspective on the matter.
    I believe all should have a right to freedom of speech. It can however be done without derogatory hate-filled provocation. Not everyone has the intellect, integrity,or unfortunately, a belief system that promotes such values.
    Sanity and sensitivity should prevail even with those who wish to educate by means of satire.

  • Vernon

    Hi Gerhard,
    Freedom of speech is a prickly matter. For instance in this country it is hate speech to call someone the “K” word; but that same person is at liberty under the law to blaspheme my Lord and Saviour.So now what?
    So called freedom of speech is a worldly institution in mainly liberal countries who insist that freedom of expression is a human right. Problem is that when I tell them that Jesus Christ is the ONLY way to salvation, I am accused of hate speech. I am entitled to an opinion provided my opinion does not clash with their opinion.
    Hope this is of some use.

    Thanx.

  • Robbie

    …and it will get better when He appears? :-)

  • Peter Caldwell-Barr

    The supposedly peace loving majority of Islam would appear to be in ignorance of their own holy book and it would seem then that the only true followers of Islam are the ones committing these terrible acts.

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)

    That’s a very good point Peter. The ones who are not following their Quran’s instructions are in fact infidels themselves.

  • Peter Caldwell-Barr

    The hypocrisy of the world is such that freedom of speech applies to some and not to others Watching the news is positively nauseating.

  • Charlie Hebdo het wel een heilige koei om te beskerm, naamlik die Sioniste. Die skrywer van die artikel verwys duidelik ook daarna. Ek vra myself af: Wat staan ‘n ‘atiest actavist’ te wen deur elke godsdiens onder die son te bespot, maar een, nl. sionisme, te beskerm?

    Daar is ‘n rede vir sg. antisemitisme in Frankryk en die res van die wereld, net soos wat daar in die 1930’s rede voor was in Duitsland. Ons moet nie nou die punt mis en Frankryk as die aanvoerder van die euwel brandmerk nie. Kom ons krap ‘n bietjie dieper en vind die WARE aanvoerder van die haat.

    Dit wil al vir my voorkom of Frankryk opgestel word as ‘n volgende ‘antisemitise natsi-staat’. Die Sioniste glo vas aan die ‘verdeel en oorheers’ metode om in beheer van die wereld te bly. .. En soos gewoonlik is daar een of ander aandag-afleier soos Islam tans gebruik word …en Apartheid in ons geval gebruik was.

  • Sheugnet

    Jy is duidelik ’n anti-Semiet wat die Jode haat. Kom ek herinner jou aan wat God oor jou te sê het.

    En Ek sal jou ‘n groot nasie maak en jou seën en jou naam so groot maak, dat jy ‘n seën sal wees. En Ek sal seën diegene wat jou seën, en hom vervloek wat jou vervloek; en in jou sal al die geslagte van die aarde geseën word. (Gen 12:2-3).

    As jy die Jode haat, haat jy die seën wat uit hulle voorgekom het, en dit is die ewige saligheid in Christus Jesus.

    En moet aseblief nie met jou mites oor die Khazars begin nie. Dis al lankal verkeerd bewys.

    Lees hier as dit nie vir jou te veel moeite is nie.

  • Sheugnet

    Sheugnet skryf:

    Thomas
    Jy maak aannames oor my karakter terwyl jy my gladnie ken nie. Dit is karakterskending.

    Jy beskuldig my van karakterskending terywl jy die karakter van God gruwelik laster en skend deur te sê Hy is ‘n leuenaar? As Hy sê Hy maak die Jode tot ‘n groot nasie, dan maak Hy dit tot ‘n groot nasie want Hy is nie ‘n leuenaar nie. Dit was mense soos Hitler wat hulle uitgeroei sodat hulle met ten minste 6 miljoen verminder het. Lees eerder jou Bybel as ‘n klomp boeke wat vir jou ‘n klomp leuens die kop inprent.

    Die res is uitgevee.

  • Martin Horan

    Charlie Hebdo published scathing comments ridiculing Jews and Christians. No Jews or Christians killed anyone for saying so.
    There has always been an undercurrent of anti-Semitism in France. The Dreyfus case showed that. Give Zola his due, he publicly attacked it. He uncovered anti-Semitism in high places in France. Not surprising as France still has a Catholic mentality. (I say so as a former Catholic so I understand the grip Catholicism holds on Catholics who never go near a church.) But, by and largely, the French are usually tolerant of others.
    I was brought up in a part of Scotland where very few people had contact with Jews so Scotland tended not to be anti-Jewish. (It was a Protestant country when I was a child. And there was more antipathy to Catholics than Jews.) Catholicism tends to hold the Jews totally responsible for crucifying Christ–though we’re all responisible.
    I can recall, I think it was in the late 1960s or very early 1970s, when the Israelis ordered a gun boat from the French and the French decided not to give them it. So the Israelis parachuted in stormtroopers and took it and sailed it to Israel. At that time Britain (I think Harold Wilson was our Prime Minister at the time–a Christian and a personal friend of Golda Meir), like America, was pro-Israel and our media actually cheered the Israelis on (changed days!). French pride must have been hurt–at least in their government. Perhaps that’s another reason they do not like Israel. Whatever the “reason” it will backfire on them [Genesis 12:2-3 & 27:29; Romans 11.] We need only to look at the Arab world to see these things come to pass right now.

  • Modimaclac

    The drawings Charlie Hebdo published mocking Jesus were far worse than anything they published on Mohammed, or even the Pope. As you say, the cartoonists and the people massacred with them all became “believers” at the same, unfortunately too late for their belief to save them.
    What is ironic is that, after their death, these out and out atheists were drawn by other cartoonists sitting on clouds in heaven, still doing satirical drawings ! Funny how people expect everyone to go to heaven… even if they say they don’t believe in it…

  • Martin Horan

    A footnote to what I said earlier:
    The above article by Vernon Gray is spot on. Incisive and true. There was a time in Britain, and probably the US, when we had journalists who could write with the same calibre as Mr Gray. Not now. Mr Gray’s above article puts to shame anything I’ve read about the Charlie Hebdo attack in the British press. Few of our journalists have the bravery to write the facts about Islam. There is one British journalist I think of who comes near to it and that’s Peter Hitchens. The rest are too scared to offend Islam. For one thing they likely be accused of Islamophobia if they tried. They are likely to be as much afraid of British laws as they are of Islamic reprisals.
    Well done, Vernon Gray.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  

  

  

Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments

Charlie Hebdo Attack - Analysis

Terms and Conditions:terms and conditions

Because this world is becoming more evil by the minute and Discerning the World is coming under attack more often from people with some very nasty dispositions, we now have ‘Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments‘ which you need to agree too before you can comment – this is to protect us and you when you comment on this website.  If you are not here to harm Discerning the World and it’s authors, please by all means comment, however if you are here to cause harm in any way, please don’t comment.

The following conditions does not mean that the authors of Discerning The World permit only opinions that are in agreement with us. This also does not mean that we fear dissenting opinions or ideas that are contrary to the beliefs that we hold (and/or that of the revealed Scriptures of the Holy Bible).

The following describes the Terms and Conditions applicable to your use of the “Comments” submission service at the Discerning the World website.

BY CLICKING THE “POST COMMENT” BUTTON FOR YOUR COMMENT, YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND ABIDE BY ALL OF THE RULES AND POLICIES SET FORTH HEREIN. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, DO NOT SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT TO DISCERNING THE WORLD WEB SITE.

  1. Discerning the World owns and operates the DiscerningtheWorld.com site (the “Site”). Your use of the features on the Site allowing for submission of a “Comment” is subject to the following terms and conditions (the “Terms”). Discerning the World may modify these Terms at any time without notice to you by posting revised Terms on the Site. Your submission of a “Comment” to the Site following the modification of these Terms shall constitute your binding acceptance of and agreement to be bound by those modified Terms.
  2. By submitting a “Comment” you are accepting these Terms through your clicking of the “POST COMMENT” button.
  3. Discerning the World has the right, but not the obligation, to take any of the following actions, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, at any time, and for any reason or no reason, without providing any prior notice:
    1. Restrict, suspend or terminate your ability to submit “Comments,” to the Site;
    2. Change, suspend or modify all or any part of the Site or the features thereof;
    3. Refuse or remove any material posted on, submitted to or communicated through the Site by you;
    4. Deactivate or delete any screen names, profiles or other information associated with you; or
    5. Alter, modify, discontinue or remove any comment off the Site.
  4. You agree that, when using or accessing the Site or any of the features thereof, you will not:
    1. Violate any applicable law or regulation;
    2. Interfere with or damage the Site, through hacking or any other means;
    3. Transmit or introduce to the Site or to other users thereof any viruses, cancel bots, Trojan horses, flood pings, denial of service attacks, or any other harmful code or processes;
    4. Transmit or submit harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, deceptive, fraudulent, obscene, indecent, vulgar, lewd, violent, hateful or otherwise objectionable content or material;
    5. Transmit or submit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, or spam;
    6. Stalk or harass any user or visitor to the Site; or
    7. Use the content or information available on the Site for any improper purpose.
  5. You retain the Copyright of any “Comment” you submit to Discerning the World. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to grant Discerning the World a irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license to use the material or commentary that you have submitted, in any medium and in any manner that Discerning the World may, in its sole unfettered discretion, choose.
  6. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to comply with the following rules concerning such submissions:
    1.  You agree not to include in your “Comment”:
      1. Any false, defamatory, libelous, abusive, threatening, racially offensive, sexually explicit, obscene, harmful, vulgar, hateful, illegal, or otherwise objectionable content;
      2. Any content that may be seen as stalking or harassing of any other Site contributors;
      3. Any content that personally attacks an individual. (An example of a personal attack is posting negative comments about an individual in a way meant to demean that person. Note that posting your opinion about someone’s ideas, doctrine or actions is not a personal attack);
      4. Any content that discloses private details concerning any person, for eg., phone numbers that have not been made public, photos that are not in the public domain, residential address that is not public, ID numbers, Social Security numbers, email addresses that are not in the public domain, etc.;
      5. Any content that you know to be false, misleading, or fraudulent;
      6. Any use of profanity;
      7. Any content including advertisements or otherwise focused on the promotion of commercial events or businesses, or any request for or solicitation of money, goods, or services for private gain;
      8. Any content that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or
      9. Any content directly or indirectly soliciting responses from minors (defined as anyone under 18 years of age).
  7. FAIR USE NOTICE:
    1. If any part of the “Comment” is not your original work, it is your responsibility to add the name of the third party, name the book with page number or a link (url) to the website where you obtained the information.
    2. Your “Comment” may contain Copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. You are however allowed to make such material available in your “Comment” in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this Site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
    3. If you wish to use copyrighted material from a website or any other medium for purposes to add to your “Comment” that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. (Fair Use means you may quote from copyrighted sources, but you may not publish the whole article, book, etc., in your “Comment”.)
  8. You are solely responsible for the “Comment” you upload, post, transmit or otherwise make available to others using this Web Site. Under no circumstances will Discerning the World be liable in any way for any “Comment” posted on or made available through this Site by you or any third party.
  9. You understand that all “Comments” on this Site are pre-screened or moderated. That means that every “Comment” needs to be approved by Discerning the World before it appears in the “Comments” section.  This is not an automatic process.  Discerning the World does this for SPAM reasons.
  10. Discerning the World has the right (but not the obligation) in their sole unfettered discretion to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or available through the Site. Without limiting the foregoing, Discerning the World has the right to remove any “Comment” that violates these Terms or is otherwise deemed objectionable by Discerning the World in its sole discretion.
  11. You understand that Discerning the World in their sole unfettered discretion is not obligated and can not be forced in any manner, be it legal or otherwise to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or made available through the Site by you.
  12. When submitting a “Comment,” you will be asked to provide your name and your email address. While Discerning the World does not object to your use of a pseudonym instead of your actual name, Discerning the World reserves the right, but not the obligation, to reject, change, disallow, or discontinue at any time any submission name that, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, is objectionable or inappropriate for any reason. Discerning the World requires the submission of your email address, but Discerning the World warrants that it will not publish your email address to an outside third party without your consent.
  13. Discerning the World does not sell or rent your personal information to third parties for their marketing purposes. From time to time, Discerning the World may contact you personally via email. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge and understand that the “Comments” feature of the Site is designed to permit users to post information and commentary for public review and comment and thus you hereby waive any expectation of privacy you may have concerning any likeness or information provided to the Site by you.
  14. You are solely responsible for your interactions with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    1. Discerning the World shall have the right, but not the obligation, to monitor interactions utilizing the “Comments” facility of the Site, between you and other users of or visitors to the Site. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World, or any third party shall not be, and you shall not seek to hold them, responsible for any harm or damage whatsoever arising in connection with your interaction with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    2. Discerning the World does not verify any information posted to or communicated via the “Comments” sections of the Site by users and does not guarantee the proper use of such information by any party who may have access to the information. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World does not assume, and shall not have, any responsibility for the content of messages or other communications sent or received by users of the Site.
  15. The Site contains content created by or on behalf of Discerning the World as well as content provided by third parties.
    1. Discerning the World does not control, and makes no representations or warranties about, any third party content, including such content that may be accessible directly on the Site or through links from the Site to third party sites.
    2. You acknowledge that, by viewing the Site or communications transmitted through the Site, you may be exposed to third party content that is false, offensive or otherwise objectionable to you or others, and you agree that under no circumstances shall Discerning the World be liable in any way, under any theory, for any third party content.
    3. You acknowledge and agree that the Site, and the contents thereof, is proprietary to Discerning the World and is protected by copyright. You agree that you will not access or use the Site or any of the content thereof for any reason or purpose other than your personal, non-commercial use.
    4. You agree that you will not systematically retrieve data or other content from the Site by any means, and you will not compile a database or directory of information extracted from the Site.
    5. You agree that you will not reproduce, distribute or make derivative works of the Site or any of the contents thereof without the express consent of Discerning the World.
    6. You hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Discerning the World, its affiliates and licensees, and all of their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives from and against any and all liabilities, losses, claims, damages, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) in connection with any claim arising out of your use of the Site or violation of any of these Terms.

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY/LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.

  • YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT USE OF THE SITE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. NEITHER DISCERNING THE WORLD, ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR LICENSORS WARRANT THAT THE SITE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, TIMELY, SECURE OR ERROR FREE.
  • THE SITE IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMLPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  • THIS DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY APPLIES TO ANY DAMAGES OR INJURY CAUSED BY ANY FAILURE OF PERFORMANCE, ERROR, OMISSION, INTERRUPTION, DELETION, DEFECT, DELAY, COMMUNICATION LINE FAILURE, THEFT OR DESTRUCTION OR UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO, ALTERATION OF OR USE, WHETHER FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORTIOUS BEHAVIOR, NEGLIGENCE OR UNDER ANY OTHER CAUSE OF ACTION. YOU SPECIFICALLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT DISCERNING THE WORLD SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE DEFAMATORY, OFFENSIVE OR ILLEGAL CONDUCT OF USERS OF THE SITE OR THIRD PARTIES, AND THAT THE RISK OF INJURY FROM THE FOREGOING RESTS ENTIRELY WITH THE YOU THE COMMENTER.
  • IN NO EVENT WILL DISCERNING THE WORLD, ITS AFFILIATES OR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR LICENSORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, EVEN IF THEY HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, ARISING FROM, RELATING TO OR CONNECTED WITH THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE SITE OR ANY OTHER MATTER ARISING FROM, RELATING TO OR CONNECTED WITH THE SITE OR THESE TERMS.

16. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between Discerning the World and you with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede any previous oral or written agreement between us with respect to such subject matter.

Thank you!