Visitors from around the World

Translate blog:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

facebook: Discerning the World

Sign up to Receive Email Updates

powered by MailChimp!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Recent Comments

General Comments Section:

Click here for the General Comments Section Discerning the World - General Conversation Section

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Article Archive

Click here to find a List of all Articles List of all Articles
Click here to find a List of all Categories to search by Categories / Keywords

Website Stats

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Chuck Smith from Calvary Chapel entertains Rick Warren

Chuck Smith from Calvary Chapel entertains Rick Warren

This might be slightly old news, but I am bringing it up again because it seems that Chuck Smith (Calvary Chapel) is an ‘untouchable’.  Everything he does wrong, that goes against the Bible and being a Christian, when it is exposed, no matter what he does gets swept under the carpet. Well that time has come to an end.

In 2006, Chuck Smith denounced the teachings of Rick Warren:

“The teachings and positions of Rick Warren have come into conflict with us at Calvary Chapel. Pastor Chuck has directed us to discontinue this product [Purpose Driven Life] effective immediately.”  —

In 2009 Chuck Smith introduced Rick Warren as my good friend who pastors Saddleback Church at a Calvary Chapel’s 20-year anniversary called “Harvest Crusade” (16 Aug 09).   Chuck Smith asked Rick Warren to lead in prayer.

See from 3:16 minutes onward:

Watch the full video here:

Chuck Smith’s response to a caller regarding sharing a platform with Rick Warren the next day on the Pastor’s Perspective radio show: [ click on Podcasts, then 17 Aug 2009]

Caller’s (John’s) Question: Should pastors share a platform at an evangelical event with someone who typifies the Emergent Church, a minister?

Smith: [chuckle] That’s difficult, John, because, you know, you might say in a sense that last night I was on the platform with a minister that they say that he is a part of the Emergent Church, that he has, you know, sort of a different emphasis in his ministry, more of a social emphasis on what the church should be doing socially for people rather than the spiritual emphasis, and so I was on the platform with him but, you know, I think that it would be divisive. Now the man, I’m convinced, loves the Lord, has a large church, and is, you know, feels that he is called of God to really deal with the social problems of our world today. Now it could be that God IS calling him to that, but that isn’t why God has called ME to do and so, but I can still look at him as a brother in Christ – he believes that Jesus died for our sins and he just has a different emphsis as far as what he feels should be the priority of the church today..
We were both invited to be there but we were on the platform together, sat next to each other, and he is a brother in Christ, and so I didn’t really have any real problem with sharing, being on the same program together with him.  [Emphasis added]

Firstly, Rick Warren deals with people on a spiritual basis. When ever you speak about the gospel you ARE dealing with people on a spiritual basis. Rick Warren as far as I am concerned has managed to single handedly destroy the church with his Purpose Driven Drivel. But Chuck Smith can’t see that.  He saw it in 2006 (apparently) and then changed his mind in 2009.  But is it really that odd that Chuck Smith would hang with an Emergent such as Rick Warren?  Well not really, because we are in the end times, and the great apostasy.

Stay tuned for more on Chuck Smith


46 comments to Chuck Smith from Calvary Chapel entertains Rick Warren

  • Christian man

    Please keep in mind that at the official Calvary chapel Costa Mesa bookstore, they sold the Purpose Driven Life for quite awhile until a few people began to complain, and only then did they pull it.

    As I stated in the other article on this topic. Calvary chapel Costa Mesa (the blueprint for the other Calvary chapels) was built upon doctrinal compromise from the very beginning. So it is wrong how some do regard Chuck Smith as invincible somehow. He is just like everyone else in that he is subject to Acts 17:11.

  • sylesa

    Hi All,
    Just another example of the continous shape -shifting of the “leaders”. I wonder if there are many out there that have any firm convictions about anything, lol! Lord help us all…

  • Burning Lamp

    Christian man, did you know that they fired the man who had tried to keep the bookstore clean – that being Paul Smith, Chuck’s brother? Yet they tolerate error after error and let the leaven grow throughout the association.

  • Christian man

    Tolerating error is the only way to “cast a wider net”, as was the phrase I heard while being there.

  • It seems these days Calvary is going more and more emergent. It is time for people to stay away. This man, Chuck Smith, is dangerous.

  • peter macharia

    gibb allen is righteous and talented and there is no question about that.may main concern was him to brief me all about the freemasons and their signs

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)


  • Mike

    I would just caution anyone who calls themself a Christian to be careful not to throw away the baby with the bathwater and make carte blanche statements about Calvary Chapel. Do you believe that just because one person in an entire church organization has an errant view on something that EVERYONE is now a reprobate? That seems to be a prevailing mood in the witch hunt. MY pastor doesn’t tolerate sin. He preaches separation. He preaches repentance. He preaches Christ crucified and is one of the most biblically sound people I know and yet he is a Calvary Chapel pastor. Just because someone is in a Calvary Chapel doesn’t mean they are suddenly totally lacking in discernment and headed to Hell as some would like to articulate. Yes, there are issues with some PEOPLE’S doctrinal beliefs in Calvary Chapel. Show me ANY Christian church on the planet that doesn’t have something that someone else is going to disagree with and swear on their mother’s grave that if someone believes differently than they do that the other party is surely deceived by Satan and bound for Hell. That wreaks of pride and elitism the likes of which I’ve only seen in the world system. We differ on various things doctrinally with other believers and yet we love Jesus Christ and serve Him alone. The cardinal doctrines of the church can NEVER be compromised but other things are peripheral and not related at all to our salvation. We will grow in the Lord, HE will lead us and His Spirit will teach us. How can we share the love of Christ with the world when we spend all of our time pointing fingers at others that differ with us on peripheral issues? Is it any wonder that unbelievers don’t want anything to do with the church? Read 1 John and you’ll notice that in that short book, the word “LOVE” is used some 29 timse. The only other book that uses the word more is the gospel of John (and it’s four times longer too). Perhaps there is a message there?????

  • Mike

    And as for Pastor Chuck sharing the stage with Rick Warren, I about came unglued. Rick Warren’s theology is WRONG and Pastor Chuck had no business being on the stage with him. I was personally disgusted with that decision. Does that mean we shun Chuck and cast him aside as a reprobate? Well, answer this first? Have you ever made a bad decision where it concerns your walk with the Lord? Let him who is without sin cast the first stone. Gosh, I wonder who said that. My point? My point is that Pastor Chuck made a TERRIBLE ERROR in judgment in my opinion and Rick Warren doesn’t belong anywhere near an evangelical church. He has compromised and capitulated with heresy and as far as I’m concerned is a heretic himself. It doesn’t take long to figure that out when reading his purpose-driven crap. And for the record, the Calvary Chapel that I attend does NOT tolerate, accommodate, or cooperate with heretical teachings and practices that would contaminate the body of Christ. We don’t fit into the mold of the “New Evangelicalism”. Again, don’t throw away the baby with the bathwater. EVERY church could be found wanting in some regard but be careful what you say about the church because it is and always will be the BRIDE OF CHRIST with all of it’s idiosyncrocies and such. Jesus died for His church and so to be bad-mouthing everything and everyone you disagree with is not a good idea. In fact, it’s sin. Use discernment and remember that the ENEMY is the enemy.

  • Robbie

    k Mike. Hold your breath and watch the fruit drop…
    God WILL reveal the true colors.

  • Michael

    Mike, we all certainly make mistakes at times but there is a difference when a leader who comes in the name of Christ and has great exposure and influence aligns himself with an individual or body that is blatantly suspect and dodgy…in leadership you have corporate or collective responsibily not only to those around you but to the larger public or greater community at large. To be chosen or elected as a leader with true Christian integrity carries this very awesome responsibility and therefore astute caution is needed so that the power of the true gospel is not lost and made non-effective.Exercising judgment in the selection of close friends and associates is an important part of Christian living. This form of judging is proper and right. Yet, it should not be done with an attitude of self-righteousness. Christians must not allow themselves to be tainted by the world. Paul wrote: “Make no mistake about this: bad company is the ruin of good character” (1 Cor. 15:33

    This is certainly not throwing stones. Discernment is a huge responsibility as it affects the eternal destiny of souls and the modern church has fallen so far down today that we seldom hear the “fire and brimstone preaching” that told it as it is, today. Preachers preach a non-offending gospel today which is a lie and false. That is why disassociation with infected individuals or bodies is an absolute imperative.

  • Moemsie

    In our small coastal town the Dutch Reform Church has more and more `emergent` traits. Apart from that it seems the `contemplative` approach is finding inroads. The `susters` are very excited to present the `sewe stasies van Christus se lyding (lydingsweek? -Lent?) All the chairs will be removed and seven wooden cubicles erected on the floor. Then all the churches in the area are invited to come and walk them `contemplatively` The Catholic Church is again invited! They gladly participated in a number of `unity` sermons already presented from his Dutch Reform Church. Does anyone of you know of another `seven stations` planned for `lent` in other Dutch Reformed Churches?

  • Burning Lamp

    Mike, I hear you brother. Yes, there is a remnant of CCs that are absolutely like you describe and we should thank the Lord for them.

    However, Pastor Chuck has made a series of missteps. Michael has so well described the accountability of leadership.

    Pastor Chuck has been on TBN a number of times, capitulating to the Crouch’s and praising their network. He has not used his bully pulpit to reign in rougue CC pastors who have brought damnable heresies of emergent garbage to their flocks. These are his “sons” and he is their “father” whom they respect. He has set a bad example by sending a mixed message.

    Also regarding the Harvest/Warren incident, the next day on the radio he had the opportunity to set the record straight but failed to do so, just as he failed to publicly address his error in advising abortion to the woman caller.

    His brother, Paul came to serve and tried to keep the distribution center biblically sound. But he was summarily fired with the blessing of Pastor Chuck.

    There is much more that could be said. No one is denying that Pastor Chuck is a humble, compassionate, caring man who loves the Lord. But he is not above deception and it stands to reason that he and the CC Fellowship would be a prime target of Satan.

  • sylesa

    Good points made on both sides of the issue, but at the end of the day, michael has the greater point. That is because God says in his Word what leaders MUST be in their qualifications. A leader is not perfect of course, but ought to be humble to correct issues immediately. A leader is not working towards the qualification(though of course growing spiritually like the rest of us) but rather he ought to have attained a certain level of spiritual maturity before coming into leadership to begin with! If a leader can’t walk it out, he does not belong in leadership plain and simple.Sit in the pew and be a sheep, lol!

  • Christian man

    Anyone remember Chuck Smith on stage with Kathryn Kulhman?

    Lest you think this problem with Chuck Smith is only recent.

  • Burning Lamp

    Regarding CS with KK – he turned away from that false teaching and left the 4 Square Church. I don’t think we can hold this old stuff against him – haven’t we ALL done something in our past that we have since abandoned? I was caught up in the charismatic movement many eons ago and would hate to have that come back to haunt me.

    There is plenty in the current day that is of concern. Just this past weekend CCCM hosted the David Barton Video Conference and two CC pastors who USED to be solid were speakers along with Larry Stockstill who is so far removed from CC teaching it is unbelievable that they would share a platform with him.

    Roger Oakland exposed this over the weekend and you can read more at his site. Truly a sad day. But we must remember there is a remnant within the CC fellowship. Who knows what they must be thinking – things just seem to get worse all the time.

  • Christian man

    Actually though my point was that he has had a pattern of falling off the track doctrinally. From KK to Rick Warren to the current example you cited. Those are just a few examples.

  • In His Grip

    Burning Lamp,
    You seem (to me at least) to hold a very balanced view on the issues that are discussed on this blog. Your comments always resonate with me. Does that sound New Agey? I hope not cause I can’t stand that stuff! Anyway,there are a few things I’d like to ask you. You mentioned something somewhere about being sure to use the right tracts and I can’t find that post now. Also, because I agree with everything you say, I’d like to know your opinions about a few teachers whose names don’t ever come up on this blog (that I’ve seen). Deborah has my address. It would be great if you could mail me there. No pressure though. I hope you’re well.

  • Burning Lamp

    CM, your point is well taken. CS seems to be a very kind and compassionate man who eschews confrontation. But only God knows his heart and is his judge. A lot of good has come out of the movement, but there seems to be a disconnect when it comes to discernment and calling out error.

    Question: Have you been following Roger Oakland and his most recent exposure of error at Costa Mesa? If not, I would advise it – this dear man has the heart of a David and the courage of a Daniel and needs support and prayer. I think you would especially appreciate his latest commentary even though you are no longer involved with CCs. We are all the Body of Christ and Roger has suffered great attacks from those he used to call friends. He stands alone and needs prayer. He doesn’t seek to do anyone harm, just sound the alarm and speak the truth in love. His website is

  • Burning Lamp

    IHG, thank you for your kind words. I will be in touch with you soon.

  • Christian man

    Well I’ve seen a lot of destruction from the movement too, lots of wounded sheep that needed years of recovery.

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)

    Christian man

    Coming from SA, it’s difficult for me to understand the full extent of the situation. All I know is that the articles I have on my site are just the tip of the ice burg. I have someone who has offered to write an article explaining pretty much everything, but because there is so much that is wrong they are struggling to write the article. I pray that Jesus uses my website to fully expose CC because what I have read and seen, I can’t believe what it’s gotten away with. It’s time the walls come down. Let us drag people out who need to get out before Jesus comes back (time is of the essence!)

  • Burning Lamp

    Christian man, did you check out the site I recommended?

    I will have to say that there are certainly legitimate criticisms and concerns about the CC movement. HOWEVER, there are some nutcases out there and some malcontents who just like to point fingers and blame when the problem is themselves. Also, there are false accusers.

    There are many good, solid, servant pastors in CCs. They are trying to keep their flocks fed and tended.

    I know many people who have been blessed through the CC movement. And you can be sure that Satan is going to attack, undermine and delude. There are many other “movements” that have done greater harm. Let’s expose what is wrong, but let’s be fair.

  • In His Grip

    You’re welcome. “Chat” soon.

  • Christian man

    Burning Lamp, we’re going in circles, and we obviously don’t agree. So I will conclude with saying that I’ve seen enough to know that it is a toxic environment due to some of their church government beliefs. If you disagree, that is your choice. But my position stands for me. I’ll conclude with that.

  • Burning Lamp

    Christian man, I have been DEEPLY wounded by a Calvary Chapel – however, I did not throw the baby out with the bath.

    I don’t see many acceptable alternatives out there. Every denomination without exception has been in some way invaded by wolves and leaven entertained unchecked. This includes the most fundamental of churches. Believe me, I have done my research. Each body has to be judged on their own merit.

    Yes, the Moses model can result in pastoral abuse, but at the same time the alternative, congregational rule has its downside and has resulted in silly church splits and the pastor being voted out because he stood for truth and people were offended.
    Some fundies are legalistic and that is not good.

    So there we go – yes, it is an endless circle/cycle in these last days and so we search for suitable food and fellowship. There are no easy answers. May the Lord grant you His peace and plant you in a good place where you can serve and grow in grace and knowledge of Him.

  • KO

    This is very interesting. I like your style of writing. Refreshing. And bold. Good stuff.

  • Maxine

    I think one must be quite careful about making blanket statements about Calvary Chapel or other churches for that matter. The Israelites sure did get some major consequences for complaining and discouraging Moses. While there is place for calling out false teachers, it seems to me that many people online can lean to having a critical spirit–not saying you do per se, but to be watchful of that. I see Christian sites blasting solid preachers about something and then when I go to verify what has been said, I discover they tool something out of context or added their own perception on it with a few doses of their own assumptions. I will say I attend a very good Calvary Chapel after spending years in an emergent church before God opened my eyes and led me out. Our Calvary is strictly expository, not legalistic, and definitely not emergent…I can smell those from miles away now. Yeah Chuck Smith is not perfect, but I worship Jesus not him, and hope people will test his words for themselves and unless he goes completely rogue–I give him some grace.

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)


    >> The Israelites sure did get some major consequences for complaining and discouraging Moses.

    Are you comparing Chuck Smith to Moses? You can’t be serious?

  • Burning Lamp

    Maxcine, are yuo familiar with the ministry of Roger Oakland and Understnd the Times?

    Although most likely you didn’t mean to compare Chuck Smith to Moses, it could be interpreted that way. I think you rather mean the general concept. I could see where some might think you mean the “touch not my anointed” false teaching.
    Chuck Smith SHOULD be called out when he embraces false teachers such as Rick Warren, he SHOULD be called out when he tells a woman he doesn’t know that she should get an abortion, and when false teachers are brought in to a venue at Calvary Costa Mesa, etc.

    Calvary Chapels have been criticized for their lack of accountability because of the form of church government that says that the pastor sits in the seat of Moses. If there is a good pastor, things are great. If the pastor falls into error, there is a problem because he is not accountable to anyone, including his elder board if he chooses not to listen to them.

    You are apparently fairly new to a Calvary Chapel. Glad you are in a good one. But don’t ever let your guard down. No man is perfect and he has a big target on his back and Satan is relentless. The Bible says we are to test all things.

    And your contention that solid teachers have been misquoted and wrongly accused does not hold water. I don’t know of any solid Bible teacher where this has been the case. If you can cite one I would appreciate it.

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)


    >> And your contention that solid teachers have been misquoted and wrongly accused does not hold water. I don’t know of any solid Bible teacher where this has been the case. If you can cite one I would appreciate it.

    Yes, please let us know.

  • Gary Charron

    I can remember when Chuck was asked about The Christal Cathedral and their doctrinal belief’s. He said we need to be careful about judging another man’s ministry because they will have to give a account before The Lord for what they have done with the gifts God has given them. I am fearful I have not been Faithful with what God has given me!

  • Calvary Chapel

    The recurrent theme from friends ex members has been that CCs do not deal with sin and/or error in it’s Churches. Can the die hard CCers -which I once was, take some time out of their church and pastor hero-worship and actually weigh whats being said with COMPLETE scriptural truth and not the usual cc ‘God is love’ and ‘we don’t like to judge/make people feel bad’ sentimentality?

    Try bringing error or sin in the church to any ccer’s attention -member and pastor
    -Over and over again, ccers would misappropriate the ‘love’ scriptures when they need to be appropriating the ‘righteous judgemnet’ or ‘church discipline’ scriptures.

    -CCers would call you CRITICAL, BITTER, UNLOVING, UNCHRISTIAN and every name under the sun for trying to expose sin and encourage truth in church.

    -Before you know it, the CC gang/cult culture comes into force and the person vying for godly conduct by exposing sin/error is directly or indirectly excommunicated from it’s churches. Along with this being my personal experience, it seems to be the same tune for many ex-ccers, but according to the die harders who would NEVER EVER try to establish the truth of a matter before condemning anyone who speaks out against their dear cc, we all are just oh so critical and unloving and unchristian for daring to spot and tackle error and sin.

    If anything positive has come from the whole cc injustce -it’s that God got me out of this one-sided doctrinal, baby-christian producing, comfortable-unbeliver-tolerating church/cult where members are totally incapable of making a personal, solid scriptural argument/exergisis/exposition/descision about anything because they are constantly spoon fed what to believe, how not to be ‘too deep’, how to avoid church-discipline because it’s divisive, how to avoud the ‘divisive pro-church-discipline ones’, how to act and mimick the pastors every doctrine -be it true or false.

    I could maybe recommend cc to a (perpetual) baby christian stuck for anywhere else to go, could NEVER recommend it to any mature/maturing believer -at least not my ex-branch in London, UK. Go in there as a mature believer only if you’re prepared to be spiritually regressing, sin and error tolerrant and a deaf and mute pastor’s clone.

    And to those who keep saying cc teaches sound doctrine/the raw word etc, etc, that’s not the point! Even the devil knows the word. The problem -at least with the cc I and friends attended is that, they just do not APPLY the word they teach in reality. Oh, the ex pastor taught against error, sin, injustice and so forth, but just did not have the gall to implement the word in real life situations where there was actually error and sin in church -more concerned about the churches image and how people would ‘FEEL’ if he did, than actually implementing what he taught.

    and for those who talk about not throwing the baby with the bath water -again, I hear what you say, but the question you need to ask yourselves is this -are we trying to please God or man? If the head church of all ccs has adopted this non-accpuntability and pastors word -right or wrong is final model, which the other ccs also adopt, then we have a problem of the whole entity existing on the basis of biblical disobedience -which is sin. If the Biblical prescription for chuch governance/accountability is that elders ought to be appointed and congregation and leaders are accountable one to the other, then isn’t going against that sin in itself? So you see, the problem isn’t that there aren’t genuine christian teachers or members in cc, but that the doctrinal foundation(s) on which the whole entity is based is SINFUL to begin with. People’s behaviours/characters are obviously shaped by whatever doctrine -errornous or inerrornoous in which they believe, and hence, the many problems of carnality in the church (CC and wider.

    Saying then that there’re true teachers/members in cc (which there are), but refusiing to also acknowledge and RID THE CHURCH OF the real issue(s), is like discovering that a completed building had no foundation, then trying to attach all sorts of props to its side to make it last 50 years hoping that the same problems wouldn’t re ocurr -total waste of time and misdirection of energy.

    Just like Christ to the 7 Churches in Revelation not only commended the good, but highlighted the sins/errors that needed correcting, so we also need to be real and deal with our sins/errors instead of doing our best to bury them and protect ‘church-image’. There is a diffrence between protecting church(i.e Christ’s image and name) and protecting church (i.e. sinning member’s and leader’s image). Protecting the latter would only dishonour the former -Christ Himself.

  • Miguel Hayworth

    please add this one to your site

    Chuck Smith – Calvary Chapel – Knights of Malta – Vatican connection

    Sorry to brake this to you, but Chuck Smith is going to far, recently Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa is promoting and highly esteeming the The Grand Magisterial Chancery for the Knights of Malta – Jerry Boykin

    Jerry Boykin is a returning visitor to Calvary Chapel.

  • LL

    Rest assured – if the Chuck Smith / Greg Laurie and the like connections doe not cease soon, many of the flock will continue to be misled. the continued connection between Rick Warren’s emerging church and Tony Blair’s Faith-Based initiative (now a religiously practicing Roman Catholic) along with the Catholic Church’s new evangelism campaign ), the Muslim Brotherhood infiltration along with the same, the Knights of Columbus connections to all of these folks and the continual connections of the church to accepting the very practices obscene to God and which He died for! – many will be misled into this “false peace” being setup and ushering in the false prophet. wake up folks – the economic disaster was planned – the health-care program also planned – does anyone not see it odd that the very same “mortgage crisis” experienced in the USA was also experienced at the very same time across the globe? food shortages are on the rise. water is unclean. homosexuality and sexual immorality sins of the like are not only acceptable in the church but are not even denounced any more. divorce rates among believers are as high as unbelievers and have been for some time. Repentance is in order and God-fearers as once called and mentioned in the New Testament need to be back in the church. if we continue to deny our calling of being Holy as He is Holy (to be set apart) then we are no longer the salt and the light of the world but are dim and watered down.

  • LL

    Like to also point out – Chuck’s end-time dating event. It appears, Chuck Smith’s discernment has been a problem for a while now. I – like the gent/woman named “Calvary Chapel” above wrote on June 11, 2011 had the same situation. If you don’t agree with the pastor of the church, you will be excommunicated in a way in which you will feel it without anyone else realizing what’s going on because they are simply blinded by the notion they could not be deceived in such a church. Pride is in itself deception. Worshiping / serving an icon – a dove – is no different than having a graven image set in front of our Lord.

  • caucazhin

    The comments above are so well thought out and its nice to see that there are so many self disciplined people of true discernment out there who arent dependent on some big name church or preacher but on the spirit of truth.
    1ST JOHN 2
    27:But you have received the Holy Spirit, and he lives within you, so you don’t need anyone to teach you what is true. For the Spirit teaches you everything you need to know, and what he teaches is true–it is not a lie. So just as he has taught you, remain in fellowship with Christ.

    After reading the comments Im in complete agreement with all those who are very critical of CC. I think Chuck is a sincere man but I think he is blinded much as king David was blinded by the evil of his sons who wanted his throne.
    His associations through the years with Kathryn Kuhlman, Lonnie Frisbee & Rick Warren say it all for me not to mention the strange coarse his son Chuck Smith Jr is on.
    Heres Chuck Smith Jr saying that being gay is a (( GIFT )) from God. GOD HELP US ! ! !

    At the end of the day we all have to realize that the corporate church is splintering more and more each day and that the ecumenical movement is like a huge vacuum sucking in all those splinters not strong enough to hang on to the carpet of truth.
    We must all remember that throughout time there has always been only a true remnant among all those who called themselves Gods people both in the OT & NT.
    We must also remember that we will all stand before God alone with know one to hold our hand.
    ………………………………….PEACE B2U ALL

  • Anyone seen the new calvary logo…all seeing eye with a dove instead of a pupil?

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)


    Where, I can’t seem to find this logo?

  • Steve


    It has since been removed from (probably from concerns) but is still used as the favicon (this is the tiny picture next to the ‘’ part).

    Mason/Knight logos are very common in calvary’s. Here is another one:

  • Redeemed

    Steve, did anyone take a screen shot of this? No evidence of it there now.

  • Kay

    Peter, please tell me what you mean about Calvary Chapel pastor, Gibb Allen? Thanks.

  • Larry

    Christian man wrote:

    Anyone remember Chuck Smith on stage with Kathryn Kulhman?

    Lest you think this problem with Chuck Smith is only recent.

    As a matter of fact, i was watching a video of an early service at Costa Mesa..
    The group “Love Song” was introduced by both Chuck Smith and Katherine Kuhlman..
    They both came from the Four Square movement..

  • Redeemed

    Larry, this is old news. Recently Chuck Smith confirmed that his embracing of Rick Warren at Greg Laurie’s Harvest Crusade was not a fluke. He had Warren as an honored guest on his daily radio program. One can still probably find it in the archives if one is so inclined to do the research.

    In reading aback through the comments, one can only wonder about people like “mike” who are undoubtedly sincere and his pastor who is serving the Lord has or will do in light of this event.

    Blind loyalty to any human being or movement is an affront to our Lord and Savior.

  • I have been studying and AGONIZING over the great falling away that I am seeing up-close and personal. THE GOSPEL OF (the)GRACE (of Christ)(There is no other according to Paul – apostle TO and OF the Gentiles – like it or not!)……………. 1 CORINTHIANS 15:1-19….GALATIANS Ch. 1 and Ch. 2:1-10…B-U-T!!!!! Paul (CONTENDING for the Gospel of Grace)spends the REST of GALATIANS(starting at 2:11)confronting our dear brother, Peter, (and all those present) FACE TO FACE, because he (Peter) was to be BLAMED (for compromising and causing others to stumble)….What we are seeing now, regarding this great apostasy, is (via seminaries, pastors, elders, laymen, ‘teachers’, ‘prophets’, ‘christian’ bookstores, etc., beginning 25-35 yrs. ago – via ignorance, sloppiness, or right out deception ) not having done what Paul did in Galatians. By the way, it’s called exhortation- 2 TIMOTHY 4:1-5 ……………..Self esteem, Inner healing, Name it & Claim it, ‘christian’ YOGA, ‘New’ apostolic reformation, contemplative prayer & mysticism (Desert fathers & mothers), ‘New” evangelicalism, “Your best life now”, ‘everyone will eventually be saved’ (christian universalism), You can be a Knight of Malta ??, Purpose-driven ‘everything’,…UGH!! Read JUDE – packed to the brim with warnings regarding false teachers. 2 PETER 1:16 – 21 and Ch. 2 & 3, regarding false teachers, and “… not following cunningly devised fables…” (fable: a fictitious story…like ‘The Shack’ ?, ‘The Quest,’etc.?” ; EPHESIANS 2 & 3, regarding the revelation of the mystery of the Church (GIVEN TO PAUL!) 2 JOHN 7 -11…don’t even bid them godspeed??
    TITUS 1:9-16 AND 2:1….. ; 2 TIMOTHY 3 and 4:1-8 – (BY THE WAY, Rick Joyner needs to read verses 6-9 – Paul DID FINISH his course, KEEPING “THE FAITH”, awaiting his CROWN OF RIGHTEOUSNESS which is laid up for him……!!) And the ONLY ONE giving ‘dominion’ to Jesus Christ is God the Father! Get back to preaching the Word of God, sound doctrine, etc., and God will take care of His part! What a price our Savior paid for a Church/Bride…w/o spot or wrinkle.
    “……,and NARROW is the gate, and FEW there be that find it…..” Lord Jesus, help us.

  • […] Chuck Smith and Rick Warren apostacising together of the Ice Burg (but we’ll get to many others in time, and the list keeps growing as more people contact me with information).  Please read:  Chuck Smith from Calvary Chapel entertains Rick Warren […]

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>




Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments

Chuck Smith from Calvary Chapel entertains Rick Warren

Terms and Conditions:terms and conditions

Because this world is becoming more evil by the minute and Discerning the World is coming under attack more often from people with some very nasty dispositions, we now have ‘Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments‘ which you need to agree too before you can comment – this is to protect us and you when you comment on this website.  If you are not here to harm Discerning the World and it’s authors, please by all means comment, however if you are here to cause harm in any way, please don’t comment.

The following conditions does not mean that the authors of Discerning The World permit only opinions that are in agreement with us. This also does not mean that we fear dissenting opinions or ideas that are contrary to the beliefs that we hold (and/or that of the revealed Scriptures of the Holy Bible).

The following describes the Terms and Conditions applicable to your use of the “Comments” submission service at the Discerning the World website.


  1. Discerning the World owns and operates the site (the “Site”). Your use of the features on the Site allowing for submission of a “Comment” is subject to the following terms and conditions (the “Terms”). Discerning the World may modify these Terms at any time without notice to you by posting revised Terms on the Site. Your submission of a “Comment” to the Site following the modification of these Terms shall constitute your binding acceptance of and agreement to be bound by those modified Terms.
  2. By submitting a “Comment” you are accepting these Terms through your clicking of the “POST COMMENT” button.
  3. Discerning the World has the right, but not the obligation, to take any of the following actions, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, at any time, and for any reason or no reason, without providing any prior notice:
    1. Restrict, suspend or terminate your ability to submit “Comments,” to the Site;
    2. Change, suspend or modify all or any part of the Site or the features thereof;
    3. Refuse or remove any material posted on, submitted to or communicated through the Site by you;
    4. Deactivate or delete any screen names, profiles or other information associated with you; or
    5. Alter, modify, discontinue or remove any comment off the Site.
  4. You agree that, when using or accessing the Site or any of the features thereof, you will not:
    1. Violate any applicable law or regulation;
    2. Interfere with or damage the Site, through hacking or any other means;
    3. Transmit or introduce to the Site or to other users thereof any viruses, cancel bots, Trojan horses, flood pings, denial of service attacks, or any other harmful code or processes;
    4. Transmit or submit harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, deceptive, fraudulent, obscene, indecent, vulgar, lewd, violent, hateful or otherwise objectionable content or material;
    5. Transmit or submit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, or spam;
    6. Stalk or harass any user or visitor to the Site; or
    7. Use the content or information available on the Site for any improper purpose.
  5. You retain the Copyright of any “Comment” you submit to Discerning the World. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to grant Discerning the World a irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license to use the material or commentary that you have submitted, in any medium and in any manner that Discerning the World may, in its sole unfettered discretion, choose.
  6. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to comply with the following rules concerning such submissions:
    1.  You agree not to include in your “Comment”:
      1. Any false, defamatory, libelous, abusive, threatening, racially offensive, sexually explicit, obscene, harmful, vulgar, hateful, illegal, or otherwise objectionable content;
      2. Any content that may be seen as stalking or harassing of any other Site contributors;
      3. Any content that personally attacks an individual. (An example of a personal attack is posting negative comments about an individual in a way meant to demean that person. Note that posting your opinion about someone’s ideas, doctrine or actions is not a personal attack);
      4. Any content that discloses private details concerning any person, for eg., phone numbers that have not been made public, photos that are not in the public domain, residential address that is not public, ID numbers, Social Security numbers, email addresses that are not in the public domain, etc.;
      5. Any content that you know to be false, misleading, or fraudulent;
      6. Any use of profanity;
      7. Any content including advertisements or otherwise focused on the promotion of commercial events or businesses, or any request for or solicitation of money, goods, or services for private gain;
      8. Any content that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or
      9. Any content directly or indirectly soliciting responses from minors (defined as anyone under 18 years of age).
    1. If any part of the “Comment” is not your original work, it is your responsibility to add the name of the third party, name the book with page number or a link (url) to the website where you obtained the information.
    2. Your “Comment” may contain Copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. You are however allowed to make such material available in your “Comment” in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this Site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
    3. If you wish to use copyrighted material from a website or any other medium for purposes to add to your “Comment” that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. (Fair Use means you may quote from copyrighted sources, but you may not publish the whole article, book, etc., in your “Comment”.)
  8. You are solely responsible for the “Comment” you upload, post, transmit or otherwise make available to others using this Web Site. Under no circumstances will Discerning the World be liable in any way for any “Comment” posted on or made available through this Site by you or any third party.
  9. You understand that all “Comments” on this Site are pre-screened or moderated. That means that every “Comment” needs to be approved by Discerning the World before it appears in the “Comments” section.  This is not an automatic process.  Discerning the World does this for SPAM reasons.
  10. Discerning the World has the right (but not the obligation) in their sole unfettered discretion to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or available through the Site. Without limiting the foregoing, Discerning the World has the right to remove any “Comment” that violates these Terms or is otherwise deemed objectionable by Discerning the World in its sole discretion.
  11. You understand that Discerning the World in their sole unfettered discretion is not obligated and can not be forced in any manner, be it legal or otherwise to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or made available through the Site by you.
  12. When submitting a “Comment,” you will be asked to provide your name and your email address. While Discerning the World does not object to your use of a pseudonym instead of your actual name, Discerning the World reserves the right, but not the obligation, to reject, change, disallow, or discontinue at any time any submission name that, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, is objectionable or inappropriate for any reason. Discerning the World requires the submission of your email address, but Discerning the World warrants that it will not publish your email address to an outside third party without your consent.
  13. Discerning the World does not sell or rent your personal information to third parties for their marketing purposes. From time to time, Discerning the World may contact you personally via email. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge and understand that the “Comments” feature of the Site is designed to permit users to post information and commentary for public review and comment and thus you hereby waive any expectation of privacy you may have concerning any likeness or information provided to the Site by you.
  14. You are solely responsible for your interactions with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    1. Discerning the World shall have the right, but not the obligation, to monitor interactions utilizing the “Comments” facility of the Site, between you and other users of or visitors to the Site. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World, or any third party shall not be, and you shall not seek to hold them, responsible for any harm or damage whatsoever arising in connection with your interaction with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    2. Discerning the World does not verify any information posted to or communicated via the “Comments” sections of the Site by users and does not guarantee the proper use of such information by any party who may have access to the information. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World does not assume, and shall not have, any responsibility for the content of messages or other communications sent or received by users of the Site.
  15. The Site contains content created by or on behalf of Discerning the World as well as content provided by third parties.
    1. Discerning the World does not control, and makes no representations or warranties about, any third party content, including such content that may be accessible directly on the Site or through links from the Site to third party sites.
    2. You acknowledge that, by viewing the Site or communications transmitted through the Site, you may be exposed to third party content that is false, offensive or otherwise objectionable to you or others, and you agree that under no circumstances shall Discerning the World be liable in any way, under any theory, for any third party content.
    3. You acknowledge and agree that the Site, and the contents thereof, is proprietary to Discerning the World and is protected by copyright. You agree that you will not access or use the Site or any of the content thereof for any reason or purpose other than your personal, non-commercial use.
    4. You agree that you will not systematically retrieve data or other content from the Site by any means, and you will not compile a database or directory of information extracted from the Site.
    5. You agree that you will not reproduce, distribute or make derivative works of the Site or any of the contents thereof without the express consent of Discerning the World.
    6. You hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Discerning the World, its affiliates and licensees, and all of their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives from and against any and all liabilities, losses, claims, damages, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) in connection with any claim arising out of your use of the Site or violation of any of these Terms.



16. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between Discerning the World and you with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede any previous oral or written agreement between us with respect to such subject matter.

Thank you!