Paving the Way for Antichrist’s Global Peace and Unity – Part 2
A Common European Army?
What has this got to do with Trump’s push for global democratization in the face of accusations that he is destroying his own country’s democracy? Wasn’t he progressively strengthening America’s position in Ukraine’s ongoing border battles against Russia with supplies of the state-of-the-art Javelin missiles to Zelensky? Haven’t foreign military sales always been a fixture of American history? Given the fact that American troops “cannot—and will not… undertake all the defense of the free nations of the world.” (Richard Nixon), the only option open to the USA is to sell arms to countries who yearn for a democracy and need to defend themselves against oligarchs like Putin. The question we need to ask, is who is going to step in to fill the military void America has created by no longer wanting to defend all of the free nations of the world?” Enter Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor.
A clear shift in global politics and the military took place when Angela Merkel emphatically stated that the European Union needed its own military army. At first glance it seemed she meant that a European army would replace NATO. Jean-Claude Juncker, the former President of the European Commission, she pointed out, said four years ago that “a common European army would show the world that there will never be another war between the European countries. And that’s not an army against NATO, I appeal to you, but it can be a good addition for NATO. Nobody wants to question classic connections but it would be so much easier to work together with us, when, at present, we have over 160 defense systems, weapons systems and the United States of America only 50 or 60 when we need self-administration, mentoring, training, we cannot be sufficient partners. And if we want to use our money efficiently and yet fight for the same goals, then we can at least in NATO join forces with a European army. I see no contradiction at all.”
A common European army? How do they propose to raise a common European army? George Soros and his Open Society Foundations (Open Borders) presented Europe with a wonderful opportunity to draft young men for their “common army” from illegal immigrants. Gatestone Institute Policy Council reported yesterday (5th December 2019) –
German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer has unveiled a new plan to reform the European asylum system. A draft of the proposal leaked to the media shows that all member states of the European Union would be required to take in illegal migrants.
Could it be that the planned European army will consist of both European citizens and migrants from various Islamic countries to cater for the jobless? Bearing in mind that the ten toes of the great statue Nebuchadnezzar saw in his dream shall consist of iron (autocracy, Islam) and clay (democracy) it may well be that this army will be a mixture of Islamic and European soldiers. (the Jesuit Pope Francis’ Chrislam). Hints of this taking place in the near future became evident when German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, French President, Emmanuel Macron, and Russian President Vladimir Putin (a NATO partner country) met with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey (became a full NATO ally, 1952) in November 2018 to draft a Post War Constitution in the wake of the civil war in Syria.
A question we need to ask is why the United States President Donald Trump, the largest contributor to NATO’s alliance, did not attend the Merkel, Macron, Putin, Erdogan meeting in 2018. According to BBC News “Nearly 70% of the total spending on defence by Nato governments is accounted for by the US. But the US is a global superpower, with military commitments well beyond Europe. In terms of its gross domestic product (GDP) (the total value of goods produced and services) the US spent roughly 3.4% on defence in 2019, according to Nato estimates, while the average in European Nato countries and Canada was 1.55%.” Surely American blood spilled on Syrian soil while fighting ISIS grants America the civil right to play a major role in the setting up of a Syrian Post War Constitution together with Germany, France, Russia and Turkey.
The possible answer to this enigma is that they already knew that President Trump was going to withdraw 2000 American troops from Syria, “ceding a strategically vital country to Russia and Iran,” according to the New York Times. Although Trump subsequently wrote a threatening letter to Erdogan urging him not to be a fool, and advising him to refrain from his invasion of northeast Syria, he cordially invited Erdogan to the White House despite Republicans and Democrats concerns. Judging by their friendly exchange of mutual respect, one would think that there was not a war going on in Syria where thousands have lost their lives.
Trump said he was a “big fan” of Erdogan’s and he reciprocated by calling Trump “my dear friend.” Who do they think we are not to see through their façade of theatrical congenialities? It is glaringly obvious that the “most powerful man” in the world, as Trump is often called even by his fiercest opponents, must play a double role. On the one hand he needs to keep his own countrymen happy with the slogan “making America great again” and on the other hand he needs to obey his luminary masters, the Illuminati/Jesuit/Mason/Kabbalah confederacy in its purpose to inaugurate the New World Order (“Novus Ordo Seclorum” on the Great Seal of the United States is becoming more prevalent than ever before).
NATO to be Replaced by an Eurasian Alliance?
Times Magazine reported on December 3rd, 2019,
Yet another confab of world leaders came and went this week, long on headlines and short on substance, as NATO leaders gathered in London to celebrate NATO’s 70th anniversary. There were laughs. There were shrugs. There were storm-offs. The only thing there wasn’t much of was genuine cooperation.
Why It Matters:
NATO is facing some serious existential issues. To be fair, they’ve been facing them since the collapse of the Soviet Union, as the military alliance’s raison d’etre was to counter threats from Moscow. NATO’s purpose was no longer clear, but there was no immediate need to disband. And in the euphoria of those “end of history” days—supercharging the momentum behind multilateralism and international cooperation—it became a vehicle to bring more countries into the Western fold (NATO’s membership grew from 16 in 1989 to 29 members today). For more than two decades it was enough for NATO to plod along.
It went on to say President Trump threw the proverbial cat amongst the pigeons when he said, “we’re the schmucks that are paying for the whole thing.” His words had scarcely left his lips when President Erdogan of Turkey “opted to purchase Russia’s S-400 anti-missile system back in 2017 after a spate of disagreements arose between Ankara and Washington, and took delivery of that system just this year, a move that shook NATO to its core—” Bear in mind that President Erdogan, as indicated earlier, had already met with Macron, Merkel and Putin in 2018 without President Trump, “the biggest schmuck paying for the whole thing” (NATO alliance).
One can only surmise that the message they intended to convey to the world then was that NATO was in the decline and that a possible Eurasian military confederation was in the ascendancy. It makes you think whether Macron’s remark that NATO was “brain dead” was something he said off the cuff or whether it wasn’t a well-rehearsed (not that a short quip like that needed any extra brain matter to formulate) or something he was expected to say.
In the following video where Macron justifies his one-liner that NATO was brain dead, President Trump says, “I heard that President Macron said that NATO is brain dead. I think that’s very insulting to a lot of different forces.” You need to enable CC (closed caption on this YouTube video to see what Trump said. Whether the sound was deliberately edited out, is not known.
Trump may not have been happy about Macron’s NATO-statement but what he said is true. He obviously knows something about Hegel’s dialectics. One of the most effective ways to implement the Hegelian dialectic (Thesis + Antitheses = Synthesis) is to befuddle the demarcation lines between friend and foe.
Confusion, especially among the masses and the everyday John Doe who just wants to make a living and enjoy life with his family, is the best method to bring about a paradigm shift in their minds. In short: mind control. And by the way, mind control had its greatest impetus with Norman Vincent Peale, a “Christian” who had “a form of godliness but denying the power thereof” (2 Timothy 3:5) and, according to Trump, was his greatest mentor.
Possibility thinking or positive confession as it became known among Word of Faith proponents is not so much about you using the power of your words to create your own destiny but mostly about having your mind conformed to the words of the modern-day priests, prophets and apostles who allegedly receive revelations directly from God. They don’t want you to think for yourself and use your God-given free-will. It is found in both Western Pentecostal, Word of Faith, New Apostolic Reformation Movements, the Roman Catholic Church, and Islam. Submission to the prophet or apostle in these spiritual realms are said to be their mandated authority to make disciples after their own kind. (Acts 20:30).
Having said this, it is necessary to point out an example of how globalists are effectively bringing about a huge paradigm shift in peoples’ minds regarding the differences between friend and foe. One of the most often heard mantras in mainline news media and even in many churches is that Islam is a religion of peace and that fundamentalist Christians are the world’s real enemies. The Bible speaks about this in John 16:2 when it says, “the time is coming when anyone who kills you will think they are offering a service to God.”
The recent shooting incident in Pensacola Florida (6th December 2019) is a perfect example of how politicians and mainline news media can so easily befuddle the demarcation lines between friend and foe. Part of this whole process, as we can see from the CNN video, is their ability to cloud terror attacks at press conferences with headings such as “motive still under investigation,” as if they don’t already know. It was even implied that the murderer liked to watch mass shooting videos (games), which, as you may recall, was one of Trump’s excuses for all the shooting sprees in America. At the same time President Trump suggested that the Saudi who shot three US naval sailors acted alone and that the Saudi King was devastated by his act of violence. Here are the “facts” according to mainline news media.
Now, the real facts. Please note that the American defense force knew perfectly well how to apply an Islamic (Quranic) belief to take out Caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi but now suddenly cannot discern why a Saudi terrorist shot and killed three naval sailors.
The training of Muslim jet fighters at a US military base seems to be the perfect place to birth the new common European army Angela Merkel wants to establish. Be that as it may, it looks as if Bible prophecy in Ezekiel 38 is beginning to take shape as we speak, but more about this a bit later. The fact remains that the New World Order can only come to fruition the moment when both sides of the political, social, religious and cultural spectrums (East and West) begin to wiggle their toes of iron and clay and dance in harmony to the tune of the King of fierce countenance (Daniel 8:23).
It is important to point out that global events, as we are experiencing them now, were predicted many centuries ago in God’s Word. God has never and never will be caught off guard and that’s precisely why He said, “Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:” (Isaiah 46:9-10).
This does not mean that God sovereignly ordained everything to happen as some believe. It simply means that mankind may do whatever he pleases, it won’t and cannot stand the test of time because He has already decided to do his good pleasure no matter what the nations have mapped out in their plans for the future, including making the world a better place and ushering in the Kingdom of God through service and good works as Alice Bailey wrote in her books. Why? Here’s the answer:
Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.Psalm 2:1-8
Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing.Isaiah 40:15
Drops of water clinging to the bottom of a bucket usually and eventually fall crushing to the ground. That’s what the nations of the world are like in the eyes of Almighty God. They are headed for a big surprise. God always grants nations ample time to repent of their evil before He strikes to judge them justly and righteously (Ezekiel 33:11).
Whilst Noah built the ark, God gave the antediluvian world 120 years of reprieve before He destroyed all flesh (except Noah and seven other souls) in a mighty flood; He gave the Canaanites 440 years of respite before He led his people out of their bondage in Egypt and anointed Joshua as his instrument to perform his righteous judgments on a nation who had been doing some of the most heinous sins imaginable that even horrified the surrounding pagan nations.
“Archeologists found several stone pillars and great numbers of jars containing remains of newborn babies. When a new house was built, a child would be sacrificed, and its body built into the wall to bring good luck to the rest of the family. Firstborn children were often sacrificed to Molech, a giant hollow bronze image in which a fire was built. Parents placed their children in its red hot hands and the babies would roll down into the fire. The sacrifice was invalid if a parent displayed grief. Mothers were supposed to dance and sing. The Israelites later copied this practice in a valley near Jerusalem called Gehenna. Hundreds of jars containing infant bones have been found there.
This seems horrible. But is our culture superior? I was shocked to learn that in the United States, there are more than 3600 abortions every day, day after day. The number of legal abortions every year far exceeds the number of U.S. soldiers killed in every war since the nation began!”Source
South Africa is not in the least any less guilty of the horrors of murdering babies. It is alleged that 200 000 abortions are performed annually of which some are repeated abortions, even up to a third time. (Source). The late “great father of the nation” Nelson Mandela signed South Africa’s new abortion bill in 1996, clearing the way for one of the world’s toughest abortion laws to be replaced with one of the most liberal. The law gives girls of any age the sole right to decide whether to have an abortion. (source).
Why were the Canaanites singled out for such harsh and severe treatment by Joshua and the Israelite at the behest of God?
They were cut off to prevent Israel and the rest of the world from being corrupted (Deut. 20:16-18). When a people starts to burn their children in honor of their gods (Lev. 18:21), practice sodomy, bestiality, and all sorts of loathsome vice (Lev. 18:23, 24, 20:3), the land itself begins to “vomit” them out as the body heaves under the load of internal poisons (Lev. 18:25, 27-30). Thus, “objection to the fate of these nations … is really an objection to the highest manifestation of the grace of God.” Green likens this action on God’s part, not to doing evil that good may come (though that does seem often to be God’s methodology: the ends justify the means), but doing good in spite of certain evil consequences, just as a surgeon does not refrain from amputating a gangrenous leg even though in so doing he cannot help cutting off much healthy flesh.Source
We often hear preachers say from their pulpits that we should all work together, including the vast array of belief systems in the world, to make the world a better place. What they mean is that we should not pry into the lifestyles of people who believe they have a constitutional and “moral” right “to do as thy wilt.” All we need to do is to love and serve one another in the spirit of unity. Today, the slightest hint of warning from the Word of God is met with fierce animosity and has virtually become a capital crime to quote from Scripture.
It is correct to say that not all Canaanites were destroyed during Joshua and the Israelite’s’ war campaigns in Canaan. Canaan’s sins which God had to punish with death are flourishing throughout the world – the killing of babies, bestiality, sodomy, idolatry, sorcery, witchcraft, unmitigated violence and all the rest are rife throughout the world. It may aptly be called, “Canaan revisited.”
CNSNews.com reported 1st December 2011:
The Senate on Thursday evening voted 93-7 to approve a defense authorization bill that includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, it also repeals the military ban on sex with animals–or bestiality.
On Nov. 15, the Senate Armed Services Committee had unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
MailOnline reported on 1st July 2013
Bestiality brothels are spreading through Germany faster than ever thanks to a law that makes animal porn illegal but sex with animals legal, a livestock protection officer has warned.
Madeleine Martin told the Frankfurter Rundschau that current laws were not protecting animals from predatory zoophiles who are increasingly able to turn to bestiality as a ‘lifestyle choice’.
Give Us a King
In 1949 just after the Second World War, Paul-Henri Spaak, former Prime Minister of Belgium and acknowledged as one of the original founders of the EU, was reported to have said:
We do not want another committee. We have too many already. What we want is a man of sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all people, and to lift us out of the economic morass in which we are sinking. Send us such a man and, be he god or the devil, we will receive him.This statement by Spaak is quoted by numerous pre-millennialist bible prophecy teachers. For example, (Hilton 2002, p. 22; Jeremiah 2008, p. 65; Grey 2013, p. 95).
Jesus Christ’s prophetic words in John 5:43 are much closer to its fulfillment than we may think. The world is in turmoil, politically, economically and especially spiritually. There is indeed a spiritual famine in the land despite the boasting in church circles that Christianity is going to experience its greatest revival ever seen and usher in the Kingdom of God.
The world at large will not and cannot enter into a new golden age of peace and prosperity, aka a New World Order, until the nation of Israel and the entire Gentile world yearn and beg for a king to straighten things out in accordance with his own set of rules of laws. The author of this article believes that such a unanimous global hankering for a universally accepted man of “peace “can only occur when the Bride of Christ has been raptured prior to the seven-year tribulation.
The lack of the rule of law breeds chaos, unmitigated sinfulness and destruction. The refrain “in those days there was no king in Israel” appear four times in Scripture and all four are confined to the pages of the Book of Judges, a time when Israel reached one of her lowest spiritual and moral points in history. Her spiritual and moral decline is expressed most fittingly in chapter 17 and verse 6, “In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes.”
The main pillar on which the globalists want to build their New World Order is THE RULE OF LAW (SHARIAH) – a global set of rules and regulations which will be enforced upon the world with brute force, presumably to secure a unified state of peace, stability and prosperity. Hence Daniel’s doleful prophetic reminder that the man of perdition (Antichrist) shall by peace destroy many. In his address of Congress, the former and now deceased president of the USA, George Bush, voiced the globalist’s agenda as follows:
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and our future generations a new world order, a world for the rule of law, not the law the jungle governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful and we will be we have a real chance with this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN founders.
Of course, the rule of law will only benefit those who bow the knee to the lawmaker (the singular use here of the word is intentional) and not those who will refuse to succumb in submission to his global authority. Morally, the lawmaker will attend in kind to man’s basest self-interests “to do as thou wilt” but politically and spiritually demand mankind to worship him and him alone (Daniel 7:29; Revelation 13:8).
Israel and Her New King
Christ’s lament, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! (Matthew 23:37; Luke 13:34), is arguably the most heartrending ever to have come from Jesus Christ’s lips. His “and ye would not” heart-cry was not limited to the moment He said it. It echoed through the centuries since Israel’s first major rejection of their King when they demanded to be given a king to judge them. What followed is well-known history portrayed in the first Book of Samuel.
And it came to pass, when Samuel was old, that he made his sons judges over Israel. Now the name of his firstborn was Joel; and the name of his second, Abiah: they were judges in Beersheba. And his sons walked not in his ways, but turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment. Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel unto Ramah, And said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, Give us a king to judge us. And Samuel prayed unto the LORD. And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. According to all the works which they have done since the day that I brought them up out of Egypt even unto this day, wherewith they have forsaken me, and served other gods, so do they also unto thee. Now therefore hearken unto their voice: howbeit yet protest solemnly unto them, and shew them the manner of the king that shall reign over them.1 Samuel 8:1-9
God often gives the people what they want when they reject Him as their sovereign king. When Samuel’s two sons, Joel and Abiah, succumbed to the temptations of filthy lucre, bribery and perverted judgment, the people who knew what devastating consequences their sins could have had on the entire nation, asked for a king to judge them. What they seemed to have overlooked then was that earthly kings usually have a dictatorial and harsh authoritative aptitude to rule their subjects. Hence God’s lament, “they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. . .. Now therefore hearken unto their voice: howbeit yet protest solemnly unto them and shew them the manner of the king that shall reign over them.”
Verse 20 is pivotal in a correct understanding of this sad event in Israel’s history. Take heed, they wanted to be like all the nations who had a king to judge them. Like Esau who was prepared to sell his birthright for a pot of lentil soup, they were prepared to be judged by an earthly king like the kings of the nations who were known to have gone out before their armies and fight for them. Their rejection of God was not only a rejection of his lordship and kingship, but also a rejection of all the things He had done for them – to go out before them and fight their battles, protect them against their enemies and divide mighty seas to lead them to freedom and salvation. There’s was a total rejection of God and the miracles He wrought in their behalf.
The same sins of Joel and Abiah are rampant in the palatial palaces and homes of kings, queens, political leaders, billionaires, church clergy, and lawmakers. Corruption, bribes, procuring filthy lucre, sexual harassment of women and children in both secular and religious sectors, and gross injustices are rampant among leaders, and cause huge economic injustices. May I again remind our readers what Paul-Henri Spaak, former Prime Minister of Belgium, said, “We do not want another committee. We have too many already. What we want is a man of sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all people, and to lift us out of the economic morass in which we are sinking. Send us such a man and, be he god or the devil, we will receive him.” The entire world is calling for a democracy, free trade, actions against global warming, the end of all wars, freedom, security, equality prosperity and peace. Francis Schaeffer coined these global cravings as follows:
All morality becomes relative, law becomes arbitrary, and society moves towards disintegration. In personal and social life, compassion is swallowed up by self-interest. As I have pointed out in my earlier books, when the memory of the Christian consensus which gave us freedom within the biblical form is increasingly forgotten, a manipulating authoritarianism will tend to fill the vacuum. At this point the words “right” [Republicans] and “left” [Democrats) will make little difference. They are only two roads to the same end; the results are the same [a New World Order]. An elite, an authoritarianism as such, will gradually force form [rule of law] on society so that it will not go into chaos — and most people would accept it. (Emphasis in brackets added).How Should We Then Live? In The Complete works of Francis Schaeffer, Vol.5 (Westchester, III,: Crossway Books, 1982, pp. 243-244