Visitors from around the World

Translate blog:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Announcements

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

facebook: Discerning the World

Sign up to Receive Email Updates


powered by MailChimp!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Recent Comments

General Comments Section:

Click here for the General Comments Section Discerning the World - General Conversation Section

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Article Archive

Click here to find a List of all Articles List of all Articles
Click here to find a List of all Categories to search by Categories / Keywords

Website Stats

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Barack Hussein Obama Deserves Nobel Peace Prize

obama - nobel peace prizeLeopold Scholtz writes in Beeld Saturday 10 October that the general feeling is the prize has been awarded to the right man, but prematurely.

Not so, says Nidra Poller. Pres. Barack Hussein Obama is the perfect recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize.

From Jihad Watch:   Yes, Virginia, Barack Hussein Obama deserves his Nobel Peace Prize

Surprised? Shocked? Outraged? Not me. I’m delighted to see that the Nobel-Peace-Prize has been awarded to the person who most richly deserves it. Not only has he made gigantic efforts to promote Nobel-Peace in his nine short months in office but as president of the residually powerful United States of America he has the superforce to impose Nobel-style peace.

President and Nobel Prince of Peace Obama is not naïve, inept, inexperienced, or wet behind the ears. He is practicing what he preached. He has already fulfilled more promises than most voters ever suspected were being made. And the way things are going, only a miracle will keep him from delivering on the rest.

Bat Ye’or teaches us the meaning of peace in our times, the peace of dhimmitude, the peace that Nobel Norwegians have dutifully honored. It is the peace of convert or die…or hang in by the skin of your teeth. When the heads have been severed from the stiff necks that refuse Islam, when the converted have been folded into the prostrate masses of the ummah, the dhimmis hand over the keys to their granges, their wives and children, their hearts and minds, their lands and dwellings in exchange for a fragile peace requiring endless sacrifice and constant restraint….This is the peace of dhimmitude, this is the peace Nobelly rewarded in…uhhh…Oslo, right? And B Hussein O is the most deserving laureate. On the very day the prize was announced, forty people were killed in a jihad attack in Peshawar Pakistan. Do you remember, way back when, during the campaign, he narrowed his eyes and said Iraq’s a distraction, let me get my hands on the trigger and I’ll take care of Pakistan. There you have it. A promise keeper of the first order. Iraq was also a distraction from Afghanistan. So mister Taliban tally your bananas, we’ve got other fish to fry, do your jihad thing and we’ll lower our eyes, peace be upon you.

President Obama’s Cairo speech alone earned him enough points to get this prize hands down. His bow to the king of Saudi Arabia. His consistent snubbing of European leaders. His betrayal of Poland and the Czech Republic. His outstretched hand that reaches all the way to Iran’s nuclear sites and protects them from rain, hail, and Israel. His betrayal of Persians yearning for democracy. His reluctance to look into McChrystal’s ball and find some kind of half way plausible strategy for the overseas contingency whatchamegig in Afghanistan.

Am I being coy? Why haven’t I mentioned his master plan for the nuclear disarmament of…

Israel!

Leaving the best for last. Even if he had not done all of the above, dayenu, he would be worthy of being hoisted on high in the Nobel firmament because he has declared war on Jewish construction in choice neighborhoods of al Quds and wannabe Palestine. Donche know, if you want peace be prepared to make war. And if you want the peace of jihad, make war on the Jews. Point your finger at them like a smoking gun. Sock it to ’em like a latter day koranic saint. Grab them by the scruff of the neck and scold them for all the world to see. Sic ’em with Goldstone, saddle them with Abbas, and send them to bed without dinner and ammunition. They wanted planes to fight to win? Stop the program, cancel the contracts, and if they holler strangle them with peace. Play footsy with Hamas, set up a mahjong date with Ahmadinejad, make cuddly eyes at Assad, and secretly decorate the private quarters of the White House with shahid posters, who would dare to protest?

Did you hear the latest? Anonymous sources have leaked to the press a flood of indignation from the peaceful Obama to you know who in the holy land. Aha! You thought he was fed up because his moderate ally Abu Mazen has reverted to PLO same o same o? Stirring up trouble on the Temple Mount because a bunch of French tourists got in the way of some irate Palestinian rocks? Which naturally led the Palestinians to go on a rampage in the narrow lanes of the Old City. How can President Obama call for the creation of a Palestinian state the day after tomorrow when his protégés are rousing a billion and a half Muslims to protect al Aqsa…from French tourists?

No. That’s not why the Nobelly anointed young man is indignant. He is ****** because Israelis are badmouthing him. Big shots and little guys in the street and on the beach, officials and cab drivers and housewives and left wing columnists are criticizing him.

Watch out. Even a Nobel-Peace-Prizer can lose his temper and explode. But then, who would blame him? What’s more dangerous for world peace, a flock of Taliban or a gaggle of chuzpadike Israelis?

Hail to the Chief for reaching out to the Taliban and forgiving them for he knows not what they do, reaching out to the Muslim Brotherhood in all its forms and machinations, reaching out to the democratically elected Ahmadinejad and drawing a veil over the rape of the innocents, reaching out to Putin over the half dead body of Georgia…and trying to close Gitmo if only the jack-in-the-box would sit down and shut up.

And if he manages to push his health care revolution bill down US throats, they’ll give him the Nobel Prize for Medicine next year. On the other hand, if he can maintain double digit unemployment and bring the dollar down to parity with the yuan he could outdistance Mugabe for the Nobel Prize for Economics.

More...

16 comments to Barack Hussein Obama Deserves Nobel Peace Prize

  • Eddy Carter-Smith

    This author is Ignorant and foolish,brain washed or just a sheeple.
    Obama is a front man for the Rothchilds and as you haveheardthe saying “noat all is as it seems’ this is tue of the usa pres – he speaks peace – but is sending a further 35000 troops to ME…I can’t begin to cooment on this type of story.

  • Discerning the World

    Of course not is all at it seems. Btw which author are you speaking about? The one from Reuters or the one who just DFA who published it for ‘interest sake’

  • Amanda

    Eddy Carter-Smith

    he speaks peace – but is sending a further 35000 troops to ME

    He is? Do you have a link for that?

  • Amanda

    Eddy Carter-Smith

    Are you thinking that peace will break out in the Middle East if the US forces withdraw?

  • Eddy Carter-Smith

    Answere to DTW -Reutors author.
    Amanda”35000 troops” Just google its the latest news,this done by the request of General McCrystal.
    Amanda’Peace in ME” most cetainly not,all part of the end time plan satan is pulling the fighting hordes in the ME,what I am commenting on is reateurs author -Hailing Obama for peace.Not so he part of Illuminati New world order.See “Google’ Tom Horn,raidersnewsnetwork.
    I study the NWO from a financial planner poin of view,ie IMF world Bank BIS etc.Obama is politicle.there is a Politicle -religios-Economic-Military- agenda to be followed,most of all your discussion in and arounf the false biblical teaches on this sight all fall under the religios agenda.Tied in with the Vatican,Whith and Black including Free masonary,Builderberg CFR, club of rome etc it gose on and on — Google “Vatican assasins”

  • Discerning the World

    Eddy,

    oh thank goodness you were speaking about the reuters author ;) Gonna have to edit me little parrot to not say ‘author’. Not to worry, I was thinking of this 3 weeks back already.

    Understand and agree with the rest of your comment

  • Amanda

    Thanks, Eddy. I see now where you are coming from.

    I have looked and no decision has been made about a surge in Afghanistan. From the BBC News last Thursday:

    US dismisses Afghan surge report

    The White House has denied reports that US President Barack Obama may soon announce a substantial increase in US troops to Afghanistan.

    Mr Obama’s press secretary Robert Gibbs said the president had not yet made a decision on troop numbers.

    We will have to wait and see what happens.

  • Michael Anthony

    John was in the fertilized egg business.

    He had several hundred young layers (hens), called ‘pullets,’
    and ten roosters to fertilize the eggs.

    He kept records, and any rooster not performing
    went into the soup pot and was replaced.

    This took a lot of time, so he bought some tiny bells
    and attached them to his roosters.

    Each bell had a different tone, so he could tell from a distance,
    which rooster was performing.

    Now, he could sit on the porch and fill out an efficiency report
    by just listening to the bells.

    John’s favourite rooster, Barry, was a very fine specimen,
    but this morning he noticed Barry’s bell hadn’t rung at all!

    When he went to investigate, he saw the other roosters were busy chasing pullets, bells-a-ringing, but the pullets, hearing the roosters coming, could run for cover.

    To John’s amazement, Barry had his bell in his beak, so it couldn’t
    ring.

    He’d sneak up on a pullet, do his job and walk on to the next one.
    John was so proud of Barry, he entered him in the Renfrew County Fair and he became an overnight sensation among the judges.

    The result was the judges not only awarded Barry the No Bell Piece
    Prize but they also awarded him the Pulletsurprise as well. Clearly, Barry was a politician in the making.

    Who else but a politician could figure out how to win two of the most highly coveted awards on our planet by being the best at sneaking up on the populace and screwing them when they weren’t paying attention.

    Vote carefully, the bells are not always audible.

  • Discerning the World

    Oh my word, that is just the funniest thing I have ever read *rolling on the floor laughing*

  • Eddy Carter-Smith

    When the President at this time has to decide to send ANOUTHER 35000 troops you’ll notice that they have to create expectation first -if there is a major fear injection like a 9/11 -then its go go go- but they have to first pre-text the move -it has been decided Forget what The O says watch Gate’s retoric his the man- By the way the real king in the USA is Cardinal Eagan.He is the supreme Uathority.(Matter of intrest)-Note also the unuasual way Peace prize is bestowed and connect ref to scripture that says “they will be “showting peace’Ed

  • Michael Anthony

    Good Article that may shed some more light on this No Bell Piece Prize….

    Good quote in this article —

    “Is the Collective Jew now “Israel”? Is love for the Palestinians just a way to camouflage Jew hatred? Obama cannot give the answer because he is part of the question. In fact, he is the perfect example of it.”

    Unholy Alliance: Norway & Obama
    by Atty. Elyakim Haetzni

    The Norwegians awarded the Nobel Prize to Obama because he personifies Muslim and Black anti-Israeli sentiment.

    Did Barack Obama’s identification with the Arab world contribute to the decision to award him the Nobel Prize? At least one thing is certain: if his policies towards Israel were less laden with animosity, he would not have received the prize. It is the Norway-Obama combination that has led me to this conclusion.
    Norway is the proof that the presence of Jews is not a necessary condition for the existence of anti-Semitism. The number of Jews there has never been higher than 2,000, yet Norway has developed an obsessive “anti-Israelism”, the current synonym for the evil anti-Semitism of old.
    For what reason? What wrong did the Jews and Israel do to far off Norway? Why is it only the “sufferings” of the Palestinians that evoke heartfelt sympathy in Norway, with minimal humanitarian feelings left for the genocide taking place in Cambodia, Darfur, the Congo and Ruanda? What about the suffering of other Muslims, non Palestinians, at the hands of their brother Muslims and the trampling of human rights in the entire Arab Middle East? Why do none of the above much interest them as long as there are no Israelis—i.e. Jews—involved?

    “Norway is the proof that the presence of Jews is not a necessary condition for the existence of anti-Semitism.”

    There were no Jews in Spain for 500 years and there are very few there today. The Inquisition is gone and the church has lost its strength. Yet the Spain of Moratinus and Solana is extremely active with regard to the Israel-Arab conflict, and its position is invariably anti Israel. Why should this be?
    Everyone knows that Socialism sprung from Jewish roots, Karl Marx and others, and that in the early Communist Party Secretariat meetings one could easily find a minyan (the required 10 man quorum) for Jewish prayers. Yet it only took one generation to eliminate Jews from any positions of leadership and to prepare to exile them to Siberia. Why is that? Why, of the many languages spoken in the USSR, were only Hebrew banned and Yiddish surpressed?

    The story of the Afro Americans in the USA is no different.
    The part that Jews played in the slave trade was the smallest of all those involved in it. It is the Arabs that played a central role– and they still do. Yet there are Afro Americans in the USA who persist in searching for the Jew’s—not the Arab’s—responsibility for slave trading. There is an ongoing phenomenon of conversion to Islam in the USA, mostly by Afro Americans. Those who convert to Islam are seen as considering Christianity a “white man’s” religion. Islam serves to express their protest at this supposed fact. So why are they anti Jews? After all, Jews marched side by side with them during the battle for Black civil rights.
    It was no other than Barack Obama himself who mused, during an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg, that:
    ” One of the frustrations… is the loss of what I consider the natural affinity between the Afro American and Jewish communities, an affinity that was understood in depth by the Black and Jewish leaders in the early days of the civil rights movement. There has since been a distancing—for many reasons, that it is not possible to enter into at this moment…”
    What are these reasons? Why did Condolesa Rice identify heart and soul with the Palestinians while even her body language evidenced her dislike for us?Why do leaders of the “Nation of Islam” such as Louis Farrakhan feel such animosity towards Israel and personalities such as Jesse Jackson turn their backs on us? Do they find in the Arab experience a mirror image of the discriminatory practices to which they are subjected in American society, while glittering Jewish success stories staring at them from every corner despite anti Jewish discrimination evoke only jealousy?

    Is the Collective Jew now “Israel”? Is love for the Palestinians just a way to camouflage Jew hatred? Obama cannot give the answer because he is part of the question. In fact, he is the perfect example of it.

    Do they find in the Arab experience a mirror image of the discriminatory practices to which they are subjected in American society, while glittering Jewish success stories staring at them from every corner despite anti Jewish discrimination evoke only jealousy?
    Afro Americans who turned to Islam found the anti-Israel virus flourishing there. When Barack Hussein Obama, a Christian raised and educated in a Muslim environment, gave his Cairo speech, he placed himself at the head of this phenomenon. From now on, all those who wish “to return Israel to its natural size”, to keep her from being strong, proud and victorious in the Promised Land, the setting in which her glorious past unfolded—racist gentiles and trendy Jewish leftists, men of the church and total atheists—all see Obama as their champion, as the only person who is capable of bringing the Jews of Israel to their knees. (Yep, I agree there)

    And if such is the case, is it surprising that the Norwegians and Obama found each other? What does it matter if the man has no past accomplishments, after all the prize was awarded to him on account of the future, in exchange for what he is expected to do…

    ..>> Makes sense to me >>

  • Discerning the World

    Yeah and this goes back to what King Abdulla said about Obama promising peace and that he is expected to make good on his promise. My comment was that no one in history has had such a burden placed on them as Obama. Because the only thing left for Obama to do is prove to Islam that he or another one to come is their Christ ‘returned’ to save them.

    Obama Promises Peace in Middle East – He Promises? Please ignore funny little square boxes all over the article. When I moved from dtw2 to here all these odd things crept into my articles which I am slowly fixing. Mighy I highlight the word ‘slowly’. lol

    Here is a question…. *ponders* the one who sets himself up in the temple, is he definitely the same one that organised peace?

    Eddy, who is this Cardinal Eagan guy? I must so some research. Anyhow, there is definitely a MAN of lawlessness and his organisation of followers who all cry peace, this includes the entire world under HER (Revelations regarding ‘Rome’). Oh and the beast that comes out of the sea in revelations is the beast the comes out of the Holy See. They produce THE anti-Christ think they are going to get the ultimate reward – complete authority over the entire world. But of course Satan is a liar, and his followers find themselves dying under his hands. Can you imagine the whole world’s shock when the pope bows down to someone else who declares himself to be God instead of the Pope who was infallible? Oh meeeee oh myyyyy.

    Oh I figured out the Russia /China one world currency thingie. EU is coercing them into putting money into IMF which they will do to destroy dollar at any cost. Recession has to become way worse (man-made of course) in order t0 bring all countries of the world to their knees and bankruptcy. But that is ok, cos they will take a loan from the IMF – one exchange rate. Now they are owned by EU with Russia and China (ALL communism). EU of course turns on them later once they have served their purpose.

    But there is somet good news, South Africa need not worry about all this, cos China owns us already – How much of our economy is funded by Russia and China from 1994 onwards and possibly before that. Oh yikes… That completely explains why the Dalai Lama was so banned from the ‘peace’ conference lol.

    Oh news flash. Word of Faith / Latter Rain preachers are jumping on the bandwagon now exposing the Emergent Church. False exposes false, truth exposes false, false exposes truth

    *I am too tired today to handle all this breaking news* lol

  • cecilia

    DTW, the pope already bow down to the Illuminati and then definitely to the Jesuits. He do as they bids. the only power he has is what they give him. ok, you want proof… give me some time to go through my docs, I have it somewhere…
    cecilia

  • Discerning the World

    C
    Yip, but the people within the belief system don’t know that, they see him as the one just beneath God, the mediator between man and Christ. In their stupidity they think they will rule with the man of lawlessness they raised up themselves within the False Prophet (Rome), but they find themselves coming off second best.

    That’s the entire point of Satan’s lies, he lies to everyone. The entire end game is all around who’s got the power. There can only be one man at the top, cos sharing in a sinful, greedy world is impossible.

  • Michael Anthony

    Let me quote a passage from http://johnmcternan.name/ (he has been a guest of both Jan Markell’s ‘Understanding the Times’ and ‘Crosstalk’ Christian radio.)

    It seems to be a horse race between the Hard Left/homosexuals and Muslims to see who can first destroy America. Sodomy is making deep inroads and is accelerating under Obama.
    Schoolhouse Shariah 09/24/09 (http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=507056)
    The US school system eliminated God from the schools in the 1960s. Now 40 plus years later Islam is coming to a school near you and being payed with your taxes. America rejected the LORD and now Islam is coming AS JUDGMENT ON AMERICA! Under Obama it looks like America will catch up with the Europeans and all the trouble they are having with Islam.
    It is a very simple equation: reject the holy God of Israel and get allah. Right now America is getting a dose of allah.

    My comment –

    Isaiah 66 (King James Version)

    4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.

    Notice just the first 6 words of that verse.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  

  

  

Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments

Terms and Conditions:terms and conditions

Because this world is becoming more evil by the minute and Discerning the World is coming under attack more often from people with some very nasty dispositions, we now have ‘Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments‘ which you need to agree too before you can comment – this is to protect us and you when you comment on this website.  If you are not here to harm Discerning the World and it’s authors, please by all means comment, however if you are here to cause harm in any way, please don’t comment.

The following conditions does not mean that the authors of Discerning The World permit only opinions that are in agreement with us. This also does not mean that we fear dissenting opinions or ideas that are contrary to the beliefs that we hold (and/or that of the revealed Scriptures of the Holy Bible).

The following describes the Terms and Conditions applicable to your use of the “Comments” submission service at the Discerning the World website.

BY CLICKING THE “POST COMMENT” BUTTON FOR YOUR COMMENT, YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND ABIDE BY ALL OF THE RULES AND POLICIES SET FORTH HEREIN. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, DO NOT SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT TO DISCERNING THE WORLD WEB SITE.

  1. Discerning the World owns and operates the DiscerningtheWorld.com site (the “Site”). Your use of the features on the Site allowing for submission of a “Comment” is subject to the following terms and conditions (the “Terms”). Discerning the World may modify these Terms at any time without notice to you by posting revised Terms on the Site. Your submission of a “Comment” to the Site following the modification of these Terms shall constitute your binding acceptance of and agreement to be bound by those modified Terms.
  2. By submitting a “Comment” you are accepting these Terms through your clicking of the “POST COMMENT” button.
  3. Discerning the World has the right, but not the obligation, to take any of the following actions, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, at any time, and for any reason or no reason, without providing any prior notice:
    1. Restrict, suspend or terminate your ability to submit “Comments,” to the Site;
    2. Change, suspend or modify all or any part of the Site or the features thereof;
    3. Refuse or remove any material posted on, submitted to or communicated through the Site by you;
    4. Deactivate or delete any screen names, profiles or other information associated with you; or
    5. Alter, modify, discontinue or remove any comment off the Site.
  4. You agree that, when using or accessing the Site or any of the features thereof, you will not:
    1. Violate any applicable law or regulation;
    2. Interfere with or damage the Site, through hacking or any other means;
    3. Transmit or introduce to the Site or to other users thereof any viruses, cancel bots, Trojan horses, flood pings, denial of service attacks, or any other harmful code or processes;
    4. Transmit or submit harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, deceptive, fraudulent, obscene, indecent, vulgar, lewd, violent, hateful or otherwise objectionable content or material;
    5. Transmit or submit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, or spam;
    6. Stalk or harass any user or visitor to the Site; or
    7. Use the content or information available on the Site for any improper purpose.
  5. You retain the Copyright of any “Comment” you submit to Discerning the World. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to grant Discerning the World a irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license to use the material or commentary that you have submitted, in any medium and in any manner that Discerning the World may, in its sole unfettered discretion, choose.
  6. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to comply with the following rules concerning such submissions:
    1.  You agree not to include in your “Comment”:
      1. Any false, defamatory, libelous, abusive, threatening, racially offensive, sexually explicit, obscene, harmful, vulgar, hateful, illegal, or otherwise objectionable content;
      2. Any content that may be seen as stalking or harassing of any other Site contributors;
      3. Any content that personally attacks an individual. (An example of a personal attack is posting negative comments about an individual in a way meant to demean that person. Note that posting your opinion about someone’s ideas, doctrine or actions is not a personal attack);
      4. Any content that discloses private details concerning any person, for eg., phone numbers that have not been made public, photos that are not in the public domain, residential address that is not public, ID numbers, Social Security numbers, email addresses that are not in the public domain, etc.;
      5. Any content that you know to be false, misleading, or fraudulent;
      6. Any use of profanity;
      7. Any content including advertisements or otherwise focused on the promotion of commercial events or businesses, or any request for or solicitation of money, goods, or services for private gain;
      8. Any content that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or
      9. Any content directly or indirectly soliciting responses from minors (defined as anyone under 18 years of age).
  7. FAIR USE NOTICE:
    1. If any part of the “Comment” is not your original work, it is your responsibility to add the name of the third party, name the book with page number or a link (url) to the website where you obtained the information.
    2. Your “Comment” may contain Copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. You are however allowed to make such material available in your “Comment” in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this Site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
    3. If you wish to use copyrighted material from a website or any other medium for purposes to add to your “Comment” that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. (Fair Use means you may quote from copyrighted sources, but you may not publish the whole article, book, etc., in your “Comment”.)
  8. You are solely responsible for the “Comment” you upload, post, transmit or otherwise make available to others using this Web Site. Under no circumstances will Discerning the World be liable in any way for any “Comment” posted on or made available through this Site by you or any third party.
  9. You understand that all “Comments” on this Site are pre-screened or moderated. That means that every “Comment” needs to be approved by Discerning the World before it appears in the “Comments” section.  This is not an automatic process.  Discerning the World does this for SPAM reasons.
  10. Discerning the World has the right (but not the obligation) in their sole unfettered discretion to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or available through the Site. Without limiting the foregoing, Discerning the World has the right to remove any “Comment” that violates these Terms or is otherwise deemed objectionable by Discerning the World in its sole discretion.
  11. You understand that Discerning the World in their sole unfettered discretion is not obligated and can not be forced in any manner, be it legal or otherwise to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or made available through the Site by you.
  12. When submitting a “Comment,” you will be asked to provide your name and your email address. While Discerning the World does not object to your use of a pseudonym instead of your actual name, Discerning the World reserves the right, but not the obligation, to reject, change, disallow, or discontinue at any time any submission name that, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, is objectionable or inappropriate for any reason. Discerning the World requires the submission of your email address, but Discerning the World warrants that it will not publish your email address to an outside third party without your consent.
  13. Discerning the World does not sell or rent your personal information to third parties for their marketing purposes. From time to time, Discerning the World may contact you personally via email. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge and understand that the “Comments” feature of the Site is designed to permit users to post information and commentary for public review and comment and thus you hereby waive any expectation of privacy you may have concerning any likeness or information provided to the Site by you.
  14. You are solely responsible for your interactions with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    1. Discerning the World shall have the right, but not the obligation, to monitor interactions utilizing the “Comments” facility of the Site, between you and other users of or visitors to the Site. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World, or any third party shall not be, and you shall not seek to hold them, responsible for any harm or damage whatsoever arising in connection with your interaction with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    2. Discerning the World does not verify any information posted to or communicated via the “Comments” sections of the Site by users and does not guarantee the proper use of such information by any party who may have access to the information. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World does not assume, and shall not have, any responsibility for the content of messages or other communications sent or received by users of the Site.
  15. The Site contains content created by or on behalf of Discerning the World as well as content provided by third parties.
    1. Discerning the World does not control, and makes no representations or warranties about, any third party content, including such content that may be accessible directly on the Site or through links from the Site to third party sites.
    2. You acknowledge that, by viewing the Site or communications transmitted through the Site, you may be exposed to third party content that is false, offensive or otherwise objectionable to you or others, and you agree that under no circumstances shall Discerning the World be liable in any way, under any theory, for any third party content.
    3. You acknowledge and agree that the Site, and the contents thereof, is proprietary to Discerning the World and is protected by copyright. You agree that you will not access or use the Site or any of the content thereof for any reason or purpose other than your personal, non-commercial use.
    4. You agree that you will not systematically retrieve data or other content from the Site by any means, and you will not compile a database or directory of information extracted from the Site.
    5. You agree that you will not reproduce, distribute or make derivative works of the Site or any of the contents thereof without the express consent of Discerning the World.
    6. You hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Discerning the World, its affiliates and licensees, and all of their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives from and against any and all liabilities, losses, claims, damages, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) in connection with any claim arising out of your use of the Site or violation of any of these Terms.

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY/LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.

  • YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT USE OF THE SITE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. NEITHER DISCERNING THE WORLD, ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR LICENSORS WARRANT THAT THE SITE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, TIMELY, SECURE OR ERROR FREE.
  • THE SITE IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMLPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  • THIS DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY APPLIES TO ANY DAMAGES OR INJURY CAUSED BY ANY FAILURE OF PERFORMANCE, ERROR, OMISSION, INTERRUPTION, DELETION, DEFECT, DELAY, COMMUNICATION LINE FAILURE, THEFT OR DESTRUCTION OR UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO, ALTERATION OF OR USE, WHETHER FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORTIOUS BEHAVIOR, NEGLIGENCE OR UNDER ANY OTHER CAUSE OF ACTION. YOU SPECIFICALLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT DISCERNING THE WORLD SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE DEFAMATORY, OFFENSIVE OR ILLEGAL CONDUCT OF USERS OF THE SITE OR THIRD PARTIES, AND THAT THE RISK OF INJURY FROM THE FOREGOING RESTS ENTIRELY WITH THE YOU THE COMMENTER.
  • IN NO EVENT WILL DISCERNING THE WORLD, ITS AFFILIATES OR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR LICENSORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, EVEN IF THEY HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, ARISING FROM, RELATING TO OR CONNECTED WITH THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE SITE OR ANY OTHER MATTER ARISING FROM, RELATING TO OR CONNECTED WITH THE SITE OR THESE TERMS.

16. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between Discerning the World and you with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede any previous oral or written agreement between us with respect to such subject matter.

Thank you!