JACK HIBBS NEPHILIM DOCTRINE OF DEMONS!
Jack Hibbs produced a series of doctrine of demons YouTube videos entitled “Who Are Those Who Can Never Be Saved,” and authored a book titled “Living in the Daze of Deception.” He elaborated on the themes of the book through a corresponding series of sermons available on YouTube.
The book garnered substantial interest from both believers and non-believers alike, achieving notable success as a National Bestseller. It ranked #3 on the Trade Paperbacks List according to Publishers Weekly and secured the #18 position overall as reported by USA Today.
THE RIGHT TO AGREE TO DISAGREE
The right to agree to disagree is based on the merit that not all Christians see everything in the same way.
We are currently in an era defined by compromises. It is quite plausible to suggest that the Eastern Yin-Yang philosophy doctrine of demons is increasingly shaping Western thought.
It represents the concept of duality and balance in Chinese philosophy, and illustrates how seemingly opposite forces are interconnected and interdependent in the natural world. In our everyday language, we often say, “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”
The concept is also encapsulated in Hegel’s dialectical method, which involves a similar process to that of Johann Gottlieb Fichte, another German philosopher, to describe the process of change and development in ideas.
Although the triad “thesis, antithesis, synthesis is attributed to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who Johann Gottlieb Fichte actually developed, he never used these terms but rather explained it in terms of “abstract, negative, and concrete.”
It ultimately submerges clear truths and the doctrine of demons in a quagmire of ambiguity and uncertainty. Regrettably, this duality has permeated the church, resulting in significant and lasting damage within the flock (Acts 20:29).
When pastors preach the unadulterated Gospel of Jesus Christ while simultaneously introducing their congregations to doctrines of demons that may appear to have minimal impact on their faith—often referred to as secondary doctrines—they risk morphing these teachings into something more perilous.
Over time, these seemingly inconsequential beliefs can lead to significant negative repercussions. A little leaven leavens the whole lump (Galatians 5:9)
DISSENTERS AND TROUBLEMAKERS
Those who refuse to compromise biblical doctrines are often labelled dissenters and troublemakers.
Jack Hibbs, the Senior Pastor of Calvary Chapel Chino Hills in California, possesses a notable ability to skillfully reinterpret fundamental biblical doctrines, often evading scrutiny from many prominent evangelists regarding his doctrinal deviations.
After advising certain individuals to prioritise the truths outlined from Genesis to Revelation (John 17:17; 2 Timothy 3:16), I found myself accused of fostering discord among fellow believers. As a result, their subsequent message conveyed a distinctly inhospitable tone directed towards me. Amir Tsarfati wrote me an email to voice his disenchantment.
I’m sorry, but what I surmise here is someone trying to pit good bible teaching teachers against each other. One thing to keep in mind is that not all teachers will see everything exactly the same in the Scriptures, however their doctrine is the same and is very biblically sound.
Man is not perfect, and we won’t get everything right perfectly. God does. So, just because they may not see the same regarding the Nephilim, does not make someone a false teacher. That is not a doctrinal issue.
All this does it tries to cause discord within the body of Christ, and we are told in Proverbs 6 that God hates discord within the body of Christ. Yet, there are still those out there trying to stir things up and calling people false teachers because of their view of the Nephilim??? That is pathetic really!– Amir Tsarfati
Diverse interpretations of the Nephilim may not directly impact an individual’s salvation; however, they do contradict Jesus’ teachings regarding the resurrection and the status of redeemed saints in heaven.
The usual response to this is that Jesus was referring to saints in heaven and not the fallen angels, suggesting that fallen angels who had been cast down on earth with Satan could copulate with earthly women and produce incredibly huge monsters as tall as 442 feet, according to the New Gnostic/New Age book “The Book of Enoch”.
If Jesus’ reference was to saints in heaven rather than the demons cast down to Earth is valid, then we must conclude that the fallen angels must have experienced a miraculous incarnational transformation from spirit to flesh.
Only the bond between two fleshly entities constitutes a divinely ordained marriage (Mark 10:8-9). Consequently, the Nephilim hypothesis undermines not only the doctrine of resurrection but also the doctrine of incarnation.
Demons cannot incarnate themselves, and it is inconceivable that God would engage in such an act, which would be considered unholy. Surely Tsarfati and Hibbs should know this.
Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. [Matthew22:29-30].
In contrast to Jesus, who criticised the Sadducees (false teachers) for their lack of understanding regarding the Scriptures and the power of God, Tsarfati finds it unfortunate to label advocates of the Nephilim theory as false teachers. Evidently, the blame lies with another party, and it is undoubtedly not Jesus Christ who is mistaken.
Tsarfati’s statement, “One thing to keep in mind is that not all teachers will see everything exactly the same in the Scriptures; however, their doctrine is the same and is very biblically sound” reminds me of Paul’s warning in Galatians 5:7-9:-
Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you. A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. [Galatians 5:7-9].
A small amount of leaven can lead one astray. Truth is not a matter of varying shades of grey; rather, it is an absolute quality of God (John 14:6). This unwavering truth delineates a precise gate and path that believers are encouraged to enter and traverse.
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Timothy 3:16-17].
If the Nephilim is not considered a doctrinal issue, what justifies Jack Hibbs’ extensive focus on it, including preaching, developing an entire YouTube series, and authoring a book on the topic?
Second Timothy 2:2-3 underscores the necessity for pastors to preach with patience and fidelity to biblical doctrine, rather than relying on the personal opinions of a diverse array of individuals.
There are a few things in the above email that need to be addressed.
MAN IS NOT PERFECT, AND WE WON’T GET EVERYTHING RIGHT PERFECTLY” — Amir Tsarfati
This statement seems to be somewhat redundant. Imperfection is an inherent aspect of human nature, which underscores our need for the guidance of the Holy Spirit, as articulated in John 16:13.
The Holy Spirit leads us toward the entirety of divine truth. It is important to recognise that the complete revelation of divine truth is not instantaneously attained upon accepting Christ as our Saviour at the moment of conversion.
The statement also contradicts Paul’s intentions as articulated in Hebrews 6:1-16. While we are encouraged to approach our faith and trust in Him with the innocence of little children, it is equally important to grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ (2 Peter 3:18).
Our goal should be to attain unity in faith and a deeper understanding of the Son of God, maturing into a perfect man, and measuring up to the stature of the fullness of Christ (Ephesians 4:13).
SO, JUST BECAUSE THEY DO NOT SEE THE SAME REGARDING THE NEPHILIM, DOES NOT MAKE SOMEONE A FALSE TEACHER. THAT IS NOT A DOCTRINAL ISSUE —Amir Tsarfati
If the theory claiming that fallen angels married human daughters, leading to the birth of the Nephilim, is not a doctrinal issue, one must consider why Jesus admonished the Sadducees for their failure to grasp the power of God.
He attributed this failure to their neglect of the Scriptures (Matthew 22:29-30). Jesus’ emphasis on this issue, particularly in relation to the critical doctrine of resurrection, highlights its immense significance to Him.
This perspective contrasts sharply with that of some of our esteemed colleagues, who often appear to prioritise mutual opinions over adherence to the unequivocal truth presented by Jesus.
A false teacher is one who falsely asserts their unwavering commitment to truth while manipulating the Word of God to mislead others.
Jack Hibbs contends that he has meticulously examined all scholarly works concerning the Nephilim and claims that they are fundamentally incorrect, positioning himself as the sole purveyor of truth.
As a result, the growing popularity of his book, “Living in the Daze of Deception,” is misleading countless unsuspecting supporters of the hybrid Nephilim hypothesis
Indeed, discord among brethren is disapproved of by God. However, some contend that individual interpretations of the Bible are acceptable, arguing that they promote a form of constructive disagreement among believers.
The phrase “Let us agree to disagree,” which is often perceived as compromising, reflects this troubling tendency. This notion brings to mind Uncle Angus Buchan, the influential South African figure recognised for his Mighty Men conferences, who articulated his thoughts as follows:
Angus Buchan is a prime example of the fulfilment of end-time prophecy, such as –
For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape [1 Thessalonians 5:3].
This peace-loving guy, who is devoid of biblical doctrines and preaches while wearing a hat as a mark of reverence to God, believes that we can prevent South Africa from descending into chaos by sidelining God’s doctrines. Angus Buchan serves as a significant indicator of the end days. For further context, one can refer to 2 Timothy 4:2-3.
Jesus said:
They that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth” (doctrinal truths and NOT self-opinionated “truths”).
Paul reiterated this:
I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. (2 Timothy 4:1-4).
The Nephilim hypothesis is a complete fable. The setting aside of biblical doctrines, however trivial some may seem, is tantamount to the setting aside of the doctrine of redemption itself.
It is difficult to pinpoint the exact percentage of salvific passages in the Bible. Nonetheless, it is undoubtedly its central theme, woven throughout both the Old and New Testaments.
While some contend that subjects such as the Nephilim and water baptism are irrelevant to salvation and should not be a bone of contention among believers, these topics often distract from the core message of biblical redemption.
A recurrent illustration of this phenomenon is the response many prospective believers provide when asked to share their salvation testimony.
They often say, “Oh, I was baptised by immersion in water today. I had a strong desire to be baptised, but my pastor informed me that I could only be baptised after I had been saved. Well, I thought to myself, if baptism is the trophy one receives after having been saved, go for it. So, I gave my life to Jesus.”
Some even throw in an extra bit of testimony by saying, “And I spoke in tongues for three solid days.” In most cases, there was no conviction of sin or the knowledge of being lost for all eternity.
Was Paul sowing discord among the brethren when he rebuked Peter for his waywardness, or was he, in fact, fostering unity? Regardless, the New Testament advocates for a constructive form of discord and division within the church, as indicated in 1 Corinthians 11:17-19.
THEIR DOCTRINE IS THE SAME AND IS VERY BIBLICALLY SOUND – Amir Tsarfati
It may appear that they are engaged in a discussion about the concept of salvation when they say that their doctrine is the same.
However, Paul advises caution in Hebrews 6:1-6, urging individuals not to dwell on the fundamental principles of salvation but to strive for perfection. The Greek word for “perfection,” teleiotēs, signifies moral and mental completeness.
The mental completeness entails possessing a discerning mind that accurately interprets matters in light of God’s teachings.
This highlights the necessity of avoiding errors by refraining from hastily concluding isolated passages of Scripture without considering them in conjunction with other relevant texts. Such an approach can often lead to misunderstanding and misinterpretation.
THE “BENE HA ELOHIM” ARGUMENT
An intriguing aspect of the term “Bene ha Elohim” is the common assumption that it exclusively refers to angels, whether holy or fallen. In the Bible, this term appears in only eleven verses, with some passages referencing angels and even Satan, while others in the New Testament refer to believers redeemed through the blood of Christ.
In contrast, Amir Tsarfati’s interpretation hinges on the Hebrew word “Naphal,” which translates to “fall down,” suggesting that the Nephilim fell from a higher state, and implying they were not the product of typical human reproduction.
Ironically, the Nephilim, often described as giants, also reemerged after the flood, indicating they could not have been the cause of the flood itself.
Perhaps we should consider rephrasing John 17:17 to read as follows: “Sanctify them through their varied perspectives; thy word is grounded in their varied viewpoints.”
Then again, why label something so pompous as a monstrosity when we’re cruising through an era that’s all about bending the rules while we endearingly bow before the altar of opinions?
Even Jack’s closest associates, among them Amir Tsarfati, Barry Stagner, and Mike Golay appear to overlook Jack’s theological inconsistencies for the sake of unity and fraternal love within the Christian community on the basis that we all have differing opinions that warrant mutual respect. God forbid!
Conversely, those who advocate for discernment and adherence to the scriptural exhortation, “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God,” are often unjustly accused of fostering discord among believers.
In a spirit of grace towards differing perspectives, these individuals tend to overlook Jack Hibbs’s biblical inaccuracies. Similar to other biblical terms, the word “lie” is frequently replaced with the more palatable term “opinion.”
As a result, rather than identifying Satan as the father of lies (John 8:44), the dialogue shifts to designate him as the father of differing opinions, which is viewed as a more brotherly approach to achieving unity.
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob cannot be associated with conflicting opinions. If He were linked to various viewpoints, it would imply wavering between truth and falsehood, which is inconceivable, to say the least.
PAUL REBUKES PETER
Consider the potential implications if Paul had chosen to extend grace toward everyone’s unique perspectives and overlooked Peter’s regression into apostasy when he gradually ceased dining with Gentile converts in Antioch in favour of adhering to Jewish dietary laws.
Who could have imagined that the slow decline of dinner engagements constituted a significant violation of the doctrine of salvation? None of the other disciples appeared to recognise Peter’s actions as such. Paul was the only one whose keen discernment could not be deceived by Peter’s antics.
Imagine Paul responding with, “Brother Peter, let us not focus on what may seem like a trivial matter concerning our eating habits. Each of us harbours distinct viewpoints that deserve mutual respect and consideration.”
Oh, I see your point. Peter was already saved when he transitioned from grace to Law, meaning he could not lose his salvation thereafter. However, Jewish unbelievers who claim to be Christians cannot attain salvation in a million years if they revert to their Jewish customs, such as sacrificing animals to seek acceptance from God, as you so tenuously asserted, Master Jack, in your YouTube video “Who are those who cannot be saved?”
One of Jack Hibbs’ remarkable talents lies in his ability to title his sermons in a way that captivates and engages his audience.
In his book, Living in the Daze of Deception, he presents a provocative theory positing that the unions between fallen angels and human women resulted in the birth of the Nephilim (Genesis 6:1-6).
He suggests that this phenomenon was the primary cause of the global deluge, which stands in contrast to God’s explicit reasoning for the flood as stated in verse 7.
“And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them (man).” (Genesis 6:7).
The text does not address the complicity of fallen angels in the Fall.
Jack Hibbs’s interpretation, which posits that the Nephilim emerged from unions between fallen angels and human women, undermines the doctrine of original sin.
Attributing responsibility for the flood to fallen angels parallels the notion of blaming Satan for Adam and Eve’s transgression.
Surprisingly, Jack Hibbs attributes culpability to human women for the actions allegedly perpetrated by fallen angels, a viewpoint that is both shocking and regrettably misguided.
The deviation into the darker realms of the doctrines of devils, as one embellishes the Book of Genesis with imaginative, mythical, and mystical concepts, often leads to more distorted interpretations.
MISINTERPRETING GENESIS 6:1-6
The incorrect interpretation of Genesis 6:1-6 endangers the authenticity of the whole book of Genesis regarding original sin.
The misinterpretation of the Book of Genesis can create a ripple effect, influencing various other doctrines. A core belief that is put at risk when the truth of Genesis is doubted or misinterpreted is the doctrine of original sin and salvation.
This will become evident in the follow-up article “WHO ARE THOSE WHO CAN NEVER BE SAVED” as Jack Hibbs wades deeper into muddy waters to lead hundreds, if not thousands, astray.
In the meantime, readers may want to watch this excellent video that debunks the Nephilim theory hook, line and sinker.
