Comments on: Charlie Hebdo Attack – Analysis

By: Martin Horan

Martin Horan — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:58:29 +0000

A footnote to what I said earlier:
The above article by Vernon Gray is spot on. Incisive and true. There was a time in Britain, and probably the US, when we had journalists who could write with the same calibre as Mr Gray. Not now. Mr Gray’s above article puts to shame anything I’ve read about the Charlie Hebdo attack in the British press. Few of our journalists have the bravery to write the facts about Islam. There is one British journalist I think of who comes near to it and that’s Peter Hitchens. The rest are too scared to offend Islam. For one thing they likely be accused of Islamophobia if they tried. They are likely to be as much afraid of British laws as they are of Islamic reprisals.
Well done, Vernon Gray.

By: Modimaclac

Modimaclac — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:27 +0000

The drawings Charlie Hebdo published mocking Jesus were far worse than anything they published on Mohammed, or even the Pope. As you say, the cartoonists and the people massacred with them all became “believers” at the same, unfortunately too late for their belief to save them.
What is ironic is that, after their death, these out and out atheists were drawn by other cartoonists sitting on clouds in heaven, still doing satirical drawings ! Funny how people expect everyone to go to heaven… even if they say they don’t believe in it…

By: Martin Horan

Martin Horan — Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:01:11 +0000

Charlie Hebdo published scathing comments ridiculing Jews and Christians. No Jews or Christians killed anyone for saying so.
There has always been an undercurrent of anti-Semitism in France. The Dreyfus case showed that. Give Zola his due, he publicly attacked it. He uncovered anti-Semitism in high places in France. Not surprising as France still has a Catholic mentality. (I say so as a former Catholic so I understand the grip Catholicism holds on Catholics who never go near a church.) But, by and largely, the French are usually tolerant of others.
I was brought up in a part of Scotland where very few people had contact with Jews so Scotland tended not to be anti-Jewish. (It was a Protestant country when I was a child. And there was more antipathy to Catholics than Jews.) Catholicism tends to hold the Jews totally responsible for crucifying Christ–though we’re all responisible.
I can recall, I think it was in the late 1960s or very early 1970s, when the Israelis ordered a gun boat from the French and the French decided not to give them it. So the Israelis parachuted in stormtroopers and took it and sailed it to Israel. At that time Britain (I think Harold Wilson was our Prime Minister at the time–a Christian and a personal friend of Golda Meir), like America, was pro-Israel and our media actually cheered the Israelis on (changed days!). French pride must have been hurt–at least in their government. Perhaps that’s another reason they do not like Israel. Whatever the “reason” it will backfire on them [Genesis 12:2-3 & 27:29; Romans 11.] We need only to look at the Arab world to see these things come to pass right now.

By: Sheugnet

Sheugnet — Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:43:58 +0000

Sheugnet skryf:

Thomas
Jy maak aannames oor my karakter terwyl jy my gladnie ken nie. Dit is karakterskending.

Jy beskuldig my van karakterskending terywl jy die karakter van God gruwelik laster en skend deur te sê Hy is ‘n leuenaar? As Hy sê Hy maak die Jode tot ‘n groot nasie, dan maak Hy dit tot ‘n groot nasie want Hy is nie ‘n leuenaar nie. Dit was mense soos Hitler wat hulle uitgeroei sodat hulle met ten minste 6 miljoen verminder het. Lees eerder jou Bybel as ‘n klomp boeke wat vir jou ‘n klomp leuens die kop inprent.

Die res is uitgevee.

By: Edmund

Edmund — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:22:05 +0000

[deleted]

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:34:14 +0000

[deleted]

By: Tom Lessing (Discerning the World)

Tom Lessing (Discerning the World) — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:22:03 +0000

In reply to Sheugnet. Sheugnet Jy is duidelik ’n anti-Semiet wat die Jode haat. Kom ek herinner jou aan wat God oor jou te sê het.

En Ek sal jou ‘n groot nasie maak en jou seën en jou naam so groot maak, dat jy ‘n seën sal wees. En Ek sal seën diegene wat jou seën, en hom vervloek wat jou vervloek; en in jou sal al die geslagte van die aarde geseën word. (Gen 12:2-3).

As jy die Jode haat, haat jy die seën wat uit hulle voorgekom het, en dit is die ewige saligheid in Christus Jesus. En moet aseblief nie met jou mites oor die Khazars begin nie. Dis al lankal verkeerd bewys. Lees hier as dit nie vir jou te veel moeite is nie.

By: Sheugnet

Sheugnet — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:44:09 +0000

Charlie Hebdo het wel een heilige koei om te beskerm, naamlik die Sioniste. Die skrywer van die artikel verwys duidelik ook daarna. Ek vra myself af: Wat staan ‘n ‘atiest actavist’ te wen deur elke godsdiens onder die son te bespot, maar een, nl. sionisme, te beskerm?

Daar is ‘n rede vir sg. antisemitisme in Frankryk en die res van die wereld, net soos wat daar in die 1930’s rede voor was in Duitsland. Ons moet nie nou die punt mis en Frankryk as die aanvoerder van die euwel brandmerk nie. Kom ons krap ‘n bietjie dieper en vind die WARE aanvoerder van die haat.

Dit wil al vir my voorkom of Frankryk opgestel word as ‘n volgende ‘antisemitise natsi-staat’. Die Sioniste glo vas aan die ‘verdeel en oorheers’ metode om in beheer van die wereld te bly. .. En soos gewoonlik is daar een of ander aandag-afleier soos Islam tans gebruik word …en Apartheid in ons geval gebruik was.

By: Peter Caldwell-Barr

Peter Caldwell-Barr — Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:30:09 +0000

The hypocrisy of the world is such that freedom of speech applies to some and not to others Watching the news is positively nauseating.

By: Deborah (Discerning the World)

Deborah (Discerning the World) — Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:52:00 +0000

In reply to Peter Caldwell-Barr. That's a very good point Peter. The ones who are not following their Quran's instructions are in fact infidels themselves.