Comments on: The Nephilim (Fallen Angels) Controversy

By: Tom Lessing (Discerning the World)

Tom Lessing (Discerning the World) — Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:37:54 +0000

In reply to Heaven.

Heaven

I’m sure you read a lot of comic books, don’t you? Because it is the only source from whence you can get your weirdo ideas.

By: Heaven

Heaven — Wed, 16 Feb 2022 01:29:24 +0000

Fun fact: The Seth view wasn’t a thing until the 3rd century AD
That tell us no before that time believe that they were humans. That includes Jesus. I guess he and the others were nuts to you guys Also not all Heavenly beings are angels. The sons of God in Genesis six may not be angels, but they aren’t men either. Also regardless if you believe or not, this reminds me of the aliens that would sometimes experiment sex on their victims. If those alien abductions stories are true, then you and others who agree are wrong. And by the looks of it are. The sons of Seth wasn’t a thing until centuries later after Jesus.

By: Heaven

Heaven — Fri, 04 Feb 2022 22:47:03 +0000

Also there is a connection between angels, evil angels, demons Faries and aliens. These two videos explain the connection. [removed]
I don’t believe that fallen angels are demons. They are probably those beings like the Prince of Persia. They seem to have spiritual bodies because how can they be in war if they are bodiless. Faries and aliens can mute. So can angels, evil angels and demons (Gabriel muted someone). Maybe there are unseen beings beside demons and angels. Faries have kids according to folklore and demons don’t. Not saying all exist, just saying that they have a connection. Now things can have a connection and be similar without being the same beings. And Faries were never seen small. Here is a video that talks about Faries. [removed]
If any of these beings exist, then maybe they are what the ancients call the sons of God. Maybe they aren’t, but that’s what people call them. They might be one of them. Except for demons who don’t have a body,

By: Heaven

Heaven — Sat, 22 Jan 2022 23:53:47 +0000

[DELETED by DTW – were not here to spoon feed you with the Gospel Truth – we present the TRUTH to you in this article, if you don’t like it please leave – you need to work out your salvation with FEAR and TREMBLING before a MIGHTY GOD].

By: Tom (Discerning the World)

Tom (Discerning the World) — Tue, 28 May 2019 07:50:51 +0000

In reply to Robbie.

Hello Robbie.

Netso! Jesus Christus was nog altyd God se Seun, hoewel Hy dikwels in die Ou Testament die “Engel van die Here” (met hoofletter “E”) genoem word. Dis interessant dat daar nie ‘n enkele keer in die Ou Testament na God as “God die Vader” in relasie tot Jesus verwys word nie. Die term “God die Vader” kom net in die Nuwe Testament voor.

Eers by Jesus se vleeswording het sy seunskap nuwe dimensie gekry in die sin dat, soos Hyself gesê het: “Slagoffer en spysoffer wou U nie hê nie, maar U het vir My ‘n liggaam berei.” (Heb 10:5). Die bereiding van ‘n liggaam vir Hom in die skoot van ‘n aardse moeder (Maria) gaan saam met die woord “gegenereer” in Hebreërs 1:5.

Die woord “gennaō” (gegenereer) beteken gewoonweg “om gebore te word” of “om hergebore te word.” Hier sien ons die verskil tussen Jesus se seunskap en alle gelowiges se seunskap ten opsigte van die Vader. Ons het deur ons wedergeboorte (herborenheid en nie geborenheid nie), en deur geloof in sy Eniggebore (Enigste) Seun, aangenome kinders (seuns) van God geword (Johannes 1:12). Geen ander wese, behalwe Jesus wat geen begin of einde het nie, is op so ‘n wyse soos Hy in die skoot van ‘n aardse moeder gegenereer nie. Dit maak Hom uniek die Enigste (Eniggebore) Seun van God. Nie die engele nie (goed en sleg) en ook nie die mens nie, word of was op so ‘n wyse in die wêreld gebring nie.

By: Robbie

Robbie — Tue, 28 May 2019 02:33:13 +0000

… wat se oom Tom? :nod:

By: Robbie

Robbie — Tue, 28 May 2019 02:31:46 +0000

Exactly Debbie. there is no father-son relationship.

“yet we still see pastors, teachers, scholars and everyday believers ignore the clear teaching of Scripture to embrace a myth regarding angels. Angels are real, but they are not sons of God. This fact is proven by using the Bible as the only source.” They build a whole doctrine from one misquoted verse quoted out of context…

By: Deborah (Discerning the World)

Deborah (Discerning the World) — Mon, 27 May 2019 10:44:28 +0000

In reply to Robbie. Thanks Robbie!! This proves that the sons of God are not angels as God is not a father to them, nor shall they be a son to Him.

By: Robbie

Robbie — Mon, 27 May 2019 07:58:54 +0000

The Bible also says in: Hebrews 1:5. For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

By: Koko

Koko — Fri, 19 May 2017 20:21:01 +0000

Hello everyone, to respond to Andrew, please give your scriptural reference to support that the fallen angels that left they habitat came to earth and got intimate with females. What the Bible says is that the angles that left their first estate have been reserved in chains until judgement day. You have now gone beyond what the bible told us to include ‘oh the reason they left their first estate was to go and have intimate relations with the female specie and hence why they are reserved in chains. Can you see how you have added to scripture? The bible never said or even suggests that the fallen angels became intimate with women. You have inferred this. This is wrong. Stop where the bible stopped and don’t go beyond. The bible says they left their first estate and so they will be punished. Leave it at that.