Rory

To earnestly contend for the faith is not pointing fingers (Jude 1:3). You are the one pointing fingers. Your entire comment is a personal attack on me, presumably due to a lack of knowledge to rebuke me from Scripture. If you do not know Scripture, it is best to remain silent. We are commanded to “…have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.” (Ephesians 5:11). If you find this irksome, I suggest you speak to God about it and tell Him that you don’t feel that He has the right to cammand you not to have fellowship with false doctrines but rather reprove them.”

Paul and Peter also did not agree on matters. What did Paul do? He rebuked Peter in public, and Peter repented. So, the only thing for you to do, is to repent like Peter.

Rev Martin Strange and his ‘strange’ doctrines of demons is full blown Hebrew Roots. He believes in the Kabbalah’s Yeshua.

Also strange when Prof Hansie Wolmarans said on the Facebook discussion “how dare anybody ask him what his believes are” yet Jean Oosthuizen made it seem to the public that this guy is a Christian with insightful theological knowledge on prayer. Such fraudsters. If they simply said they are ‘Spiritualist’ then the talk and their comments would have all made sence.

Thank you for shedding light on the confusion.

Regards,

Hi Ida, You have taken me back many years when I used to comment on Kletskerk, of which Jean Oosthuizen was the moderator. I called it “Swetskerk” because of the filthy language they used. It made the ape species, from which we allegedly evolved, hang their heads in shameful disgust for having to be associated with some of the vilest human beings. They blasphemed God in the most horrendous ways. Hansie Wolmarans (Hans Worsie) is no better. Read here.

I have also come across an interesting article in which Jean Oosthuizen promotes mysticism (the kind Mosaiek Kerk teaches and promotes). Indeed, the foul fowls of the earth and birds of the air (demons) are beginning to flock together very rapidly.

https://www.litnet.co.za/mistieke-teologie-dalk-die-kerk-se-reddingsboei/?fbclid=IwAR3XgnehACStJHTsrYcw3l9dYcQS

Tom, I used to listen to Riekert’s teaching videos on youtube. Some was quite pleasant on the ear, but lately its like he is pushing an unbiblical theory. While reading your articles on Riekert, there came on the radio rsg a talk about prayer on ‘Uit n ander hoek’ met Jean Oosthuizen.

The main talker was Prof Hansie Wolmarans. He made Riekert seem like small fry.

Prof Hansie seems to be an unbeliever but yet he speaks authoritatively about prayer. Then the prof dared another theologian to criticise his youtube video. I went and had a look at it… couldn’t listen past the first 3 minutes. A very strange new gospel alla Hansie. He debunks the resurrection and the Bible. Calling it:

‘the resurrection in context’

DTW – Please give some insight on Prof Hansie’s views. I apologise if this is said under the wrong catagory.

https://www.facebook.com/100004267093011/posts/1746589762159910/?app=fbl

Regards,

Hi Rev Martin Strange. First of all, the New Testament was not written in Hebrew. It was written In Koine Greek. Jesus Christ’s and his disciples’ mother tongue was Aramaic, which had some influences on some of the books in the New Testament. You ask:

Why on earth would Yeshua condemn the pharisaical teachings but commend their ‘ex cathedra’ pronouncements?

Well, Jesus Himself provided the answer when He rebuked their hypocrisies by telling the people to do what they told them to do but not to follow their examples. Their talk was inconsistent with their walk.

By the way, are you a Hebrew Roots proponent?

Hi Ida. Yep, he simply deletes what he dislikes because exhortationms may damage his image. He is a very popular pastor in South Africa, and he would do anything to maintain his popularity.