Visitors from around the World

Translate blog:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

facebook: Discerning the World

Sign up to Receive Email Updates

powered by MailChimp!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Recent Comments

General Comments Section:

Click here for the General Comments Section Discerning the World - General Conversation Section

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Article Archive

Click here to find a List of all Articles List of all Articles
Click here to find a List of all Categories to search by Categories / Keywords

Website Stats

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Palace of Peace and Reconciliation located in Astana, Kazakhstan

Palace of Peace and Reconciliation located in Astana, Kazakhstan

Palace Of Peace And ReconciliationThe Palace of Peace and Reconciliation

(also translated as the Pyramid of Peace and Accord) is a 77 m high building in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan. The structure was built by Sembol Construction at a cost of 8.74 billion Kazakh tenge (about $58 million) and opened in late 2006.

The word Astana in Kazakh literally means Capital but the word itself originates from Persian (Astana, from the verb Istadan (آستان) to stand (in respect)), and literally means “threshold” (royal or sacred, where people stand in respect or awe), implying where the court is seated (the capital city) or the body of a sacred person in interred (a shrine town)  Wikipedia

Bayterek (Kazakh: Бәйтерек, “tall poplar [tree]”). The monument is meant to embody a folktale about a mythical tree of life and a magic bird of happiness: the bird, named Samruk, had laid its egg in the crevice between two branches of a poplar tree.  –Wikipedia

Religious leaders met for discussions at the Palace of Peace and Accord

More photos:


14 comments to Palace of Peace and Reconciliation located in Astana, Kazakhstan

  • Elmarie A

    Bayterek “Tall Poplar Tree” or the “Tree of Life”

    Bayterek is a monument and observation tower in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan. A tourist attaction popular with foreign visitors and native Kazakhstanis alike, it is a common symbol of the city and itself in turn symbolizes Astana’s new status as the capital of Kazakhstan.

    The monument is meant to embody a folktale about a mythical tree of life and a magic bird of happiness: the bird, named Samruk, had laid its egg in the crevice between two branches of a poplar tree. The 105m structure consists of a narrow cyllindrical shaft emeshed in flaring white branch-like girders, widening toward the top (the “tree”), where a gold-mirrored 22m-diameter sphere (the “egg”) containing the obsevation deck is supported.

    The altitude of the deck is 97m, symbolizing the year of the capital-transfer to Astana (1997). From its height it is possible to see much of the newly built city. The viewing platform features a gilded hand print (Alakan) of the right hand of Nursultan Nazarbayev, the first President of the independent Republic of Kazakhstan. An accompanying plaque suggests that visitors place their own hand in the imprint and make a wish; when one does so the Kazakh national anthem plays. In addition to the observation platform, the tower contains a large aquarium and an art gallery.

  • Elmarie A

    A Geostrategy for Eurasia by Zbigniew Brzezinski

    Seventy-five years ago, when the first issue of Foreign Affairs saw the light of day, the United States was a self-isolated Western hemispheric power, sporadically involved in the affairs of Europe and Asia. World War II and the ensuing Cold War compelled the United States to develop a sustained commitment to Western Europe and the Far East. America’s emergence as the sole global superpower now makes an integrated and comprehensive strategy for Eurasia imperative.

    Eurasia is home to most of the world’s politically assertive and dynamic states. All the historical pretenders to global power originated in Eurasia. The world’s most populous aspirants to regional hegemony, China and India, are in Eurasia, as are all the potential political or economic challengers to American primacy. After the United States, the next six largest economies and military spenders are there, as are all but one of the world’s overt nuclear powers, and all but one of the covert ones. Eurasia accounts for 75 percent of the world’s population, 60 percent of its GNP, and 75 percent of its energy resources. Collectively, Eurasia’s potential power overshadows even America’s.

    Eurasia is the world’s axial supercontinent. A power that dominated Eurasia would exercise decisive influence over two of the world’s three most economically productive regions, Western Europe and East Asia. A glance at the map also suggests that a country dominant in Eurasia would almost automatically control the Middle East and Africa. With Eurasia now serving as the decisive geopolitical chessboard, it no longer suffices to fashion one policy for Europe and another for Asia. What happens with the distribution of power on the Eurasian landmass will be of decisive importance to America’s global primacy and historical legacy.

  • Elmarie A

    Kazakhstan’s “Palace of Peace and Reconciliation” Pyramid in Astana, Eurasia’s Illuminati HQ

    Since 2006, kazakhstan’s new capital city of Astana, itself an enormous hub of construction since it inherited the title in 1997, has been home to one of the world’s most impressive and visually futuristic pyramids, known as the palace of peace and reconciliation. It was designed by british super-architects foster + partners, cost 8.74 billion kazakh tenge (i don’t need to tell you bright young humans that this equates to approx. £35m) and was built to accommodate the triennial ‘congress of world and traditional religions’. If there was ever a positive to be found for the existence of the idiocy we know and love as religion, this building could be it, as after an impressively rapid 2 years of design and construction, the end product is a masterpiece.

  • Moemsie

    Thanks Deborah for posting the article on the Peace Palace and thanks Elmarie for the informative essay on Eurasia-it gives a LOT of food for thought!

    Interesting to note the circular conference table/desk in the `illuminated capstone` . All the brainstorming(the wise ones and their accord) happening up there… Note the Doves on the windows: Oh so for peace!.

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)

    Kazakhstan is the 2nd coldest place on earth. What’s wrong with these people. I would have picked a sunny island to build on.

    Wait…. this must be where HELL FREEZES OVER.

  • Grant C

    There is an enormous amount of anti-Christian energy encapsulated in this building, it’s function, position, intent and it’s (official) visitors. It is a clear indicator of the ‘lateness’ of the age we are living in. Let us keep our eyes on the Cross and block our ears to the ecumenical pronouncements that issue from those false leaders gathered in this place against the simple and perfect Truth of Jesus.

  • Elmarie A

    I had a bittie of battle to open this articel and then sourced it on antoher link it does make some interesting reading.

    Palace of Peace & Accord, Kazakhstan by Foster and Partners
    22 September 2006
    By Ellis WoodmanDeputy Editor

    New architecture, like much else in Kazakhstan, bears the mark of the country’s president, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Yet the latest landmark in its new capital is a Foster building through and through

    The pyramid is exactly as high as it is long and wide.

    Perfection, of a kind, was what he was after, And the poetry he invented was easy to understand…
    Epitaph on a Tyrant, WH Auden

    In Kazakh mythology, the Samruk bird lays its golden egg in the Baiterek or poplar tree. When the Samruk flies away, a snake eats the egg. The bird returns a year later, lays another, the snake eats it and so, ever bleakly, on. Like the legend of the phoenix, it is a regeneration myth. In the Kazakh steppe stands a tower that has been conceived as a representation of this story. The structure, completed in 2002, comprises an “egg” of gold mirror glass held aloft on a “tree” of white-painted steel latticework. The Kazakhs have dubbed it “The Big Chupa Chups” for its resemblance to the American lollipop.
    A lift ascends into the egg. From here, we can gaze out and find a town set on the far bank of the Ishim River, a couple of miles to the north. Its history goes a long way to explaining why a fable of endless renewal should exert such a hold over the Kazakh imagination.

    In the 1830s, Russian colonial forces built a fort here and called it Akmolinsk. A settlement developed at first tentatively and then grew apace after it became the site of a major rail intersection. However, further expansion was curtailed by the upheavals of 1917 which saw Kazakhstan morph into the second largest republic of the Soviet Union. It wasn’t until the fifties, when Khrushchev initiated a programme to cultivate a vast expanse of the Kazakh steppe, that the town’s fortunes picked up. Under the Virgin Lands Campaign some 300,000 — mainly Ukrainian — immigrants settled in the town and its hinterland to contribute to the farming effort.

    In 1961, its central role in the programme was marked by a change of name. It would now be called Tselinograd, the Virgin Lands City. So it remained until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. With independence, Tselinograd became Aqmola. But not for long: in 1994, the president decreed the capital would be moved here from Almaty, its historic home near the Chinese border. Henceforth, the city’s name would be Astana — literally “capital”.

    The pyramid’s congress chamber is sited at the top of the pyramid and is enclosed by stained glass designed by Brian Clarke. The hanging garden is visible through the circular void in the centre of the meeting room table.

    Quite why the president, Nursultan Nazarbayev, relocated his government to this provincial backwater remains unclear. Almaty is a cosmopolitan city with a rich architectural heritage and balmy climate. Astana’s building stock testifies to the parsimony of the Soviet era, there is next to nothing in the way of cultural infrastructure and the climate is punishing beyond belief — in winter, temperatures of -40C are not unkown.

    Quite why the president relocated his capital to this provincial backwater remains unclear
    It has been suggested that Nazarbayev was keen to put some distance between the capital and China, a country Kazakhs have historically viewed as a threat. The move also served to consolidate the president’s power in a part of Kazakhstan heavily populated by Russian immigrants — a group that, unchecked, might be tempted to rejoin its former homeland. However there was surely another motivation — a motivation quite removed from the pursuit of narrow tactical advantages but one that had everything to do with securing the president’s position at home, abroad, indeed in history. Moving the capital to Astana allowed Nazarbayev to build and — with the extraordinary level of foreign investment that the country has attracted since the discovery of its untapped oil reserves — to build on an epic scale.

    The Big Chupa Chups or “Tree of Life”, to give it its official title, stands midway down the length of a mile-long boulevard, 100m wide — a space not so very far from the scale of Washington DC’s National Mall. This is the backbone of Astana’s new town. Huge offices line it to either side, essaying the wedding-cake architecture of Stalin’s Moscow in aluminium cladding. A smattering of structures that are the product of a rather sweeter tooth are interspersed: a national archive resembling a giant easter egg, a pair of 30-storey cones in gold mirror glass, a trio of towers that shimmy like belly dancers. In what is evidently something of a national pastime, the Kazakhs have given the tallest building here a new name. On account of its profile, the tower of the transport ministry is known as The Lighter. In May, to widespread amusement, it caught fire.

    Looking back to Astana from the Palace of Peace and Accord. The domed building at the front is the Presidential Palace.

    Nazarbayev moved the capital from Almaty in 1997 — a figure that, Libeskind-style, is reflected in the 97m height of “The Tree of Life”. However, construction of the new town began only six years ago, nominally in accordance with a masterplan by Japanese architect Kisho Kurokawa. Takashi Tsubokura, a member of his team, maintains a website,, which chronicles the history of the city. Here he recalls the afternoon in 2001 when the plan of the new city was finalised. Working at a scale of 1:20,000, Kurokawa determined the layout on a large sheet of tracing paper laid out on the conference room table.

    “He drew roads with black pens and painted green zones with green pens, using his whole body like a conductor wielding the baton,” explains Tsubokura. “Every time the ink ran out, he threw away the pen and took a new one. Sometimes he stopped and frowned and sometimes grinned contentedly. A staff of four or five just kept standing without a word. I was vacantly looking at Tokyo skyscrapers outside the window. It lasted one or one and a half hours. Startled at the sound of a pen hitting the floor, I came to myself. Just at that time Kurokawa finally painted out the whole tracing paper. He told us in a tired voice to make a fair copy of it on the computer and went out of the room.”

    Whatever dreams of omnipotence Kurokawa entertained during this performance can’t have lasted long. His role was soon usurped by local consultants and key features of his plan, such as planting a forest around the city’s perimeter were junked. In fact, Kurokawa’s marginal place in the scheme of things had never been hard to discern. “I am the architect of Astana,” Nazarbayev once told a journalist, “and I am not ashamed to say that.”

    In the course of my three days in Astana, I didn’t manage to meet the president. However, I did place my hand in his. From the observation deck of the Tree of Life, a stately spiral staircase rises to an elevated platform. Here we find a pedestal, oriented towards the Presidential Palace at the eastern end of the boulevard. It supports a triangular gold ingot in which Nazarbayev’s (suspiciously gigantic) handprint has been cast. You can touch palms, make a wish and a few bars of the Kazakh national anthem burst forth.

    Construction work in Astana. The Tree of Life is visible at the far right of the image.
    ‘I am the architect of Astana,’ president Nazarbayev once told a journalist. ‘ I am not ashamed to say that’

    Stood here, you can but wonder about the latter-day Khan who has willed this Xanadu into being. Nazarbayev was born to peasant stock but rose through the Kazakh Communist party, to become first secretary in 1989. Keeping a firm grip on the reins of power he survived the break-up of the Soviet Union to be elected to the presidency in 1991. It is a post he has held ever since. In January, he was sworn in for another seven-year term having secured 91% of the vote in the last general election. As the scale of that majority suggests, Kazakhstan isn’t exactly Sweden. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe monitored the last election and condemned it as falling short of international democratic standards. Intimidation of voters was cited as a key concern. Corruption is endemic. A journalist who revealed that $1 billion had found its way into a secret Swiss bank account in Nazarbayev’s name was subsequently gaoled on a dubious rape conviction. Newspapers are habitually impounded and in the past 12 months, two opposition leaders have been murdered.

    That said, observers are also agreed, that in this country with no democratic tradition, the president does genuinely enjoy enormous support. It is not hard to see why. Under his leadership, the standard of living has risen steadily and the country is unencumbered by a strong police presence. Looking down on the new town’s main boulevard you may bridle at the monomania of the planning but it is an undeniably relaxed scene. Workers are covering the hoardings round one of the many construction sites with CGIs of the corporate wonderland to come. Or rather, they should be – for the moment they have seconded one of these huge vinyl banners as an improvised wrestling mat. Behind them a Busby Berkeley parade of flowerbeds, sculptures and fountains processes down the boulevard in immaculate formation. Sooner flowerbeds than jackboots, I find myself thinking.

    Beside the president’s handprint, there is just one other object on the upper platform of the golden egg. It is a tablet commemorating a conference held at Astana’s Intercontinental Hotel in September 2003. The memorial’s privileged location reflects this event’s central role in the founding mythology of the city. At the president’s invitation, representatives of 18 religions assembled for two days of discussion. In conclusion, they issued a declaration of their shared commitment to values of peace and religious tolerance. This first Congress of World and Traditional Religions also voted to convene further gatherings in Astana, to be held once every three years. Last week it met again, this time in a building specially designed for the purpose.

    The pyramid viewed from the Presidential Palace.
    In the summer of 2004, Foster & Partners received a call from Sembol Construction, a Turkish contractor that had begun to secure a significant quantity of work in Astana. It explained that Nazarbayev had approached it with the request for a permanent structure to house the congress. There was a site: directly opposite the presidential palace. There was a timeframe: it had to be ready in just over two years. Otherwise, the brief was fuzzy in the extreme. But there was one further proviso. The “architect of Astana” had been thinking about the form that his Palace of Peace & Accord should take. He had decided that a pyramid would be suitable. Would Foster & Partners like to design it?

    It is tempting to speculate on just how many Pritzker Prize winners would have accepted such an invitation. In an age of signature architecture, the notion that a client might offer diktats on form would surely be anathema to most. Why then did Foster say yes? No doubt, the challenge of getting the thing built at such speed spoke to a certain boy scout can-doism. The prospect of conquering another far-flung location may even have tickled some imperial aspiration. And, of course, it wasn’t a totally ridiculous marriage of form and architect. While it may never have employed quite so unadulterated a platonic solid as this, the search for a reduced, unified expression is a thread running through all Foster & Partners’ work. Of particular relevance, many of its defining projects — the Sainsbury Centre, Swiss Re and Sage Gateshead among them — like the pyramid, conflate roof and wall into a single treatment.

    However, none of this would have swayed the decision to take the job, practice partner David Nelson insists, had the practice not felt that the pyramid form enjoyed a convincing relationship to the programme. Nelson offers two arguments in support of his belief that it does. The first turns on a question of symbolism. “As a representational form for what [Nazarbayev] was trying to do the pyramid fitted pretty well,” he says. “The pyramid hasn’t really been owned by any religion since ancient Egyptian times. It could therefore represent a large number of different religions.” That is true. However, how many forms are owned by religions? Granted, you might want to steer clear of steeples, minarets and six-pointed stars, but it is not a long list.

    The president had decided a pyramid would be suitable. Would Foster like to design it?
    Nelson’s other point is a functional one. “We liked the hierarchical disposition of the pyramid,” he explains. “The top is clearly the most important part and the base is broader. It is a perfect hierarchical diagram. We could therefore dedicate a space at the top to a focused religious activity and accommodate large gatherings at the base.” Very large gatherings, it turned out. The dimensions of Foster’s first scheme were exactly modelled on those of the Great Pyramid of Cheops, largest of the pyramids at Giza. That is 230m in width and length, 146m high. Nazarbayev was impressed, but even he balked at the scale — the ground level could accommodate a crowd of 80,000. He sent his architects off to try again and threw them an extra challenge — could the building incorporate a 1,500 seat opera house? Needless to say, the deadline was unchanged.

    Plan of the Presidential Park.
    It required a workforce of nearly 2,000 (supplemented by the Kazakh army in the final stretch) but earlier this month, Nazarbayev got his pyramid. With a width and length of 62m, its ground floor area may be a mere 14th that of the earlier project, but this isn’t a building that you are going to miss. It sits at the eastern end of the new town’s main axis, although separated from the rest of the recently built development by the Ishim River. Its seclusion won’t last for long. The city plan proposes that the axis will be extended east a further mile as Astana builds towards a notional “completion date” of 2030. Already, the Presidential Park — of which the pyramid is the centrepiece — is underway as are some of the tall, mainly residential, buildings that are to be ranged around it.

    The opera house has been buried below the pyramid, or at least as low as Astana’s high water table allowed. So placed, it still projected 5m above the surrounding ground level, prompting the construction of a major earthwork to cover it up. This actually proves a happy counterpoint to the structure above it. In this interminably flat landscape, the mound lends the pyramid an elevated situation, at once helping to retrieve it from the realms of cod-Egyptian caricature while greatly enhancing its impact. Crucially, the mound also resolves the question of how to make an entrance in such a pure form. Four routes have been cut into the base — a main entrance on the east, a VIP entrance to the west and service entrances to north and south — ensuring that one effectively enters the pyramid from below.

    The pyramid itself is more pertly proportioned than the earlier scheme: at 62m tall, it is exactly as high as it is wide and long. In response to the challenges of building in the Kazakh winter, it was designed in steel rather than in the concrete that has been used for the building’s lower levels. Its triangulated frame registers on the elevations as a net of stainless steel lines, each bay corresponding to the proportion of the overall surface within which it is read. The first scheme was to be entirely of stained glass designed by Foster & Partners’ long-time collaborator, Brian Clarke. In the final building, Clarke’s contribution is largely restricted to the pyramid’s peak, where the congress chamber is sited. Otherwise, the structure is faced in granite — pre-mounted on large concrete panels — save for a run of small, diamond-shaped windows at low level. With so little glazing, the building presents an enigmatic, not to say forbidding, image. Yet, watching the light calibrate the relationship between the stainless steel and grey granite, I had to admit that it had a beauty, however chilly.

    The first impression of the interior is one of extraordinary darkness. The architect describes the building as “a tent on top of a cave”. Accordingly, the foyer has been lined out in polished black stone. What light there is, comes in through the diamond shaped windows at the pyramid’s base, high above our heads. In front of us, stands the volume of the auditorium, the outer walls of which have — rather inadequately — been clad in timber-veneered panels. However, given that it was added so late to the programme, the auditorium is, surprisingly, the most convincing of the building’s interiors. Squeezing the fly tower into the profile of the pyramid was a headache but the three-tiered horseshoe arrangement recalls the intimacy of Glyndebourne. There is one significant innovation: the inclusion of a glazed oculus that can be closed off at the start of each performance by motorised flaps. Otherwise, the space makes no bones about the fact that it is the product of the accumulated experience of countless earlier opera theatres. It is all the better for it.

    Returning to the foyer, we can at last climb into the body of the pyramid. The architect describes it as a transition from dark to light and, comparatively, it is. Stepping on to the roof of the opera house, we enter an atrium that echoes the building’s external form. Blue and yellow light permeates from on high, generating a sub-aquatic atmosphere. In order that the coloured light might have a surface to play on, a white ceramic frit has been applied over 70% of the full-height glazing that separates the atrium from the five floors of accommodation distributed around its edge. Without any other light source, these floors are very poorly lit indeed. The brief was always sketchy about these areas. At one time they were to house a “University of Civilisations”. Now, one floor has been fitted out to serve as office space during the congress while it is thought that the others will support some form of exhibition. In truth, occupying them is always going to be a question of “making do”. No attempt has been made to make more of them than the low-grade stuffing required to pad out the pyramid form.

    A 70% ceramic frit has been applied to the full-height glass walls around the central atrium.
    The main means of vertical circulation takes the form of two banks of inclined lifts — a disappointingly cursory means of choreographing the journey towards the Congress Chamber. However, on exiting the lift at level six, delegates will find that the short walk to their seats isn’t one that they will forget in a hurry. A pair of double-helix ramps ascend through a densely planted hanging garden. They wind towards a circular steel platform which is cradled off the main structure at just four points. Light falls around its edge and also through a wide oculus at its centre. As the delegates arrive at this level, they discover that a United Nations style table encircles this void. They also see the full splendour of Brian Clarke’s stained glass at close quarters. A flock of enormous doves are pictured ascending towards the sun that is the central emblem of Kazakhstan’s national flag. A pacific inner glow is doubtless anticipated. Alternatively, you may feel like Tippi Hedren in the last reel of The Birds.

    What are we to make of this extraordinarily bizarre project? The first thing to say is that, despite the mixed parentage of its design, the finished work is — for better or worse — a “Foster building” through and through. Along with the recent Hearst Tower, it belongs to a lineage that can be traced back through the practice’s past work to a number of the megastructures devised by Foster’s mentor, Buckminster Fuller. That heritage bestows predictable strengths and weaknesses. As ever, the rigour with which a single idea has been pursued astounds, never more so than when the price of such rigour proves to be five floors with next to no daylight.

    In modern times, pyramid-building may have become something of a specialist activity, but the Foster scheme is not unique. Saparmyrat Niyazov, the authoritarian leader of neighbouring Turkmenistan, has built a pyramidic “trade centre” which doubles as the largest fountain in the world. Last month he ordered the construction of a second 40m pyramid to commemorate his country’s independence from the Soviet Union. Kim Jong Il, the leader of North Korea, famously decreed the construction of a vast pyramidic hotel in Pyongyang which lies abandoned after it was discovered that it wouldn’t bear its own weight. The form’s attractions to such demagogues aren’t hard to guess, not least what David Nelson calls its status as a “perfect hierarchical diagram”.

    Whatever else it may be, the Palace of Peace & Accord strikes me as inescapably a monument to the president. Evoking an ancient history of mausoleum-building, it is a structure built to house if not Nazarbayev’s body, then at least his legacy down the ages. However, when Foster & Partners was considering whether to accept the commission, the ostensible value of the programme proved enough to sweep away any concerns about how the building might be co-opted as part of Nazarbayev’s personal mythology. It is a position that it evidently shares with the leaders of 18 world religions

    So is the programme a meaningful one? I can’t speak for Nazarbayev’s motivations. However, the day before the Palace of Peace & Accord opened, Yerjan Utembaev, former head of the Kazakhstan Senate staff and the man that Nazarbayev had charged with organising the first Congress was sentenced to 20 years in prison for having ordered the murder of opposition leader Altynbek Sarsenbaev and his two assistants. History in Kazakhstan is moving quickly. It won’t be long before we learn whether Foster & Partners has acted as an agent of peace and accord or as something more unwitting.


    and also

  • Elmarie A

    Religious leaders met for discussions at the Palace of Peace and Accord Picture a bittie more about it.

    III Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions will be held on July 1-2, 2009 in Astana.

    “Today, the ancient Kazakh land is honored to invite the leaders and high representatives of the world and traditional religions for dialogue between civilizations and religions”. – Nursultan Nazarbayev

    Today, the Republic of Kazakhstan is a striking instance of peaceful coexistence of over 40 confessions and denominations as well as 130 nationalities and ethnic groups.

    Historically Kazakhstan was always a crossroad, a place of meeting and dialogue of various religions, cultures and civilizations of the East and West.

    The spiritual tolerance inherited from the cultural and ethical traditions of Kazakhs serves as a reliable foundation for maintaining the civil peace both in the present and future. Being an independent state, Kazakhstan ensured an absolute religious freedom to all Moslems, Orthodox Christians, Catholics, Protestants and Jews. The nation saw a considerable quantitative and qualitative growth of religious institutions. Today, the total number of religious associations reached 4,173 while in 1990 it comprised 670.

    The number of Islamic associations grew from 46 to 2,441. There occurred almost five-fold growth in number of the Russian Orthodox Church parishes (from 62 to 293), two-fold increase of the Roman Catholic Church associations (from 42 to 86), Evangelical Baptist Christians communities (from 168 to 362) and Seventh Day Adventists (from 36 to 66). The quantity of Jehovah’s Witnesses associations increased from 27 to 78, and that of Protestant alliance of new trends jumped from 13 to 540.

    Religious associations own 3,129 cultic buildings, including 2,229 mosques, 258 Orthodox and 93 Catholic churches, 6 synagogues and over five hundred Protestant churches and prayer houses.

    Currently 384 missioners from over 20 foreign countries work in the Republic of Kazakhstan while in 1990 there were only 12 people.

    Religious organizations periodically publish 38 printings.

    The Moslem Id al-Adha and Orthodox Christmas are national holidays in Kazakhstan.

    Upon the initiative of the Kazakhstan President, Mr. Nazarbayev N., the city of Astana witnessed two Congresses of World and Traditional Religions Leaders in 2003 and 2006. Those forums demonstrated not only the right direction of the country external policy but also proved the effectiveness of the unique Kazakhstani model of inter-confessional collaboration.

    The upcoming Third Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions 2009 to be held again in Astana will become the next step in strengthening the relationship between the confessions and contribute to the global dialogue of civilizations.

    The Kazakhstani model of inter-relations between the state and religious organizations is based on democratic principles respecting the believers’ rights and freedoms, on equality of public and religious interests, partnership and strive for mutual understanding. This is an outcome of the targeted policy of the Head of the State, Mr. Nazarbayev N.

    With respect to obligations concerning the believers’ rights, Kazakhstan effectively collaborates with the Office for Democratic Institutes and Human Rights of OSCE.

    Close cooperation with the OSCE Office in the city of Almaty contributed to establishing in the country of the regulatory framework focused on equality of rights and freedoms of all citizens regardless of their religious and ethnic background.

    The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Freedom of Belief and Religious Organizations” was adopted in 1992 and never changed in its essence despite the numerous problems arising in the religious sphere and national-confessional relations.

    At the moment the Parliament has completed debates concerning the Draft Law “On amendments and additions to some legislative acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the Issues of Freedom of Belief and Religious Organizations” initiated by a group of deputies last spring. On November 26, 2008 the Draft Law was submitted for approval to the President of RK.

    It is feasible that the mentioned Draft Law is intended to regulate the religious issues within the framework of the international standard on respect for human rights and consideration of global experience.


    this is really interesting stuff..there is something about kazakhstan that is becoming more and more apparent..i have a further post i will do tomorrow about this..their role in the world is rapidly taking shape..this congress is just another way of blurring together the different religions of the world into, dare i say world religion

    note the palace of peace and accord where the congress takes place..a pyramid..masonic icon and symbol..enough said eh?

    “Non religious people constitute 12.7% of the population of the Earth. People who do not profess any religion must not automatically be attributed to atheists. Non-religious people can be just beyond religions. Some people just do not want to belong to any confession because of different reasons and they may even not be able to define or formulate their religious attitude and religions feelings. This group of people includes those who are non-religions and those who are beyond religion. There is no good religion for them, therefore there is no religiousness for them either”

  • Elmarie A

    I found the link to the Tony Blair Faith foundation here tooo. It was to be expected and I just had to confirm it.

    Congress of World and Traditional Religions

    By the instrumentality of
    *President of the Republic of Kazakhstan
    *Senate of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan
    *Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan
    *Alliance of civilizations
    *Casa Asia
    *Interfaith calendar
    *Tony Blair Faith Foundation
    *Community of Sant’ Egidio

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)

    If I read correctly somewhere last night it said something about this place being near Iran?

    My hubby was speaking about Babylon a few min ago and it hit me… could this be it?

    Or am I totally wrong and I should just pack it up for the evening and go to bed lol.

  • Elmarie A

    Deborah (Discerning the World) wrote:

    If I read correctly somewhere last night it said something about this place being near Iran?

    Astana, Kazakhstan hmmm Babylon close enough maybe

  • Azamat

    I like the Palace of Peace and Soglasiya.Odna old proverb says : “The world fears time, but time fears the pyramids .” Indeed, their simple form and scale give rise in the mind of thoughts about the stability of these structures. This structure was created by world famous architect Norman Foster , specifically for ” the Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions .” Its uniqueness lies not only in the purpose for which it was built , but also in the principle of ” Golden Section Fibonacci “, on which was built piramida.Zdes is a concert and opera hall with 1500 seats , the opening of which was addressed Montserrat Caballe . Also, under the arches of the pyramid is the conference rooms, exhibition areas , galleries, and more. The largest hall ” Cheops Atrium” , contains in itself the song ” Master Plan of Astana until 2030 “, which affects its size .
    At the top of the Palace of Peace and Harmony Hall is located “Cradle” in which world-renowned conference of leaders of world religions. Spread around the hall “Winter Garden” delighting variety of vegetation from around the world . A pyramid crowned by a large glass dome depicting doves symbolizing the 130 nations of Kazakhstan. Dome light at night and he was like a beacon pointing the way to the symbol of the unity of different religions , cultures and peoples.

  • Deborah (Discerning the World)


    >> symbol of the unity of different religions , cultures and peoples.

    John 14:6 “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

    When will you accept Jesus as your Saviour?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>




Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments

Palace of Peace and Reconciliation located in Astana, Kazakhstan

Terms and Conditions:terms and conditions

Because this world is becoming more evil by the minute and Discerning the World is coming under attack more often from people with some very nasty dispositions, we now have ‘Terms and Conditions for Submission of Comments‘ which you need to agree too before you can comment – this is to protect us and you when you comment on this website.  If you are not here to harm Discerning the World and it’s authors, please by all means comment, however if you are here to cause harm in any way, please don’t comment.

The following conditions does not mean that the authors of Discerning The World permit only opinions that are in agreement with us. This also does not mean that we fear dissenting opinions or ideas that are contrary to the beliefs that we hold (and/or that of the revealed Scriptures of the Holy Bible).

The following describes the Terms and Conditions applicable to your use of the “Comments” submission service at the Discerning the World website.


  1. Discerning the World owns and operates the site (the “Site”). Your use of the features on the Site allowing for submission of a “Comment” is subject to the following terms and conditions (the “Terms”). Discerning the World may modify these Terms at any time without notice to you by posting revised Terms on the Site. Your submission of a “Comment” to the Site following the modification of these Terms shall constitute your binding acceptance of and agreement to be bound by those modified Terms.
  2. By submitting a “Comment” you are accepting these Terms through your clicking of the “POST COMMENT” button.
  3. Discerning the World has the right, but not the obligation, to take any of the following actions, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, at any time, and for any reason or no reason, without providing any prior notice:
    1. Restrict, suspend or terminate your ability to submit “Comments,” to the Site;
    2. Change, suspend or modify all or any part of the Site or the features thereof;
    3. Refuse or remove any material posted on, submitted to or communicated through the Site by you;
    4. Deactivate or delete any screen names, profiles or other information associated with you; or
    5. Alter, modify, discontinue or remove any comment off the Site.
  4. You agree that, when using or accessing the Site or any of the features thereof, you will not:
    1. Violate any applicable law or regulation;
    2. Interfere with or damage the Site, through hacking or any other means;
    3. Transmit or introduce to the Site or to other users thereof any viruses, cancel bots, Trojan horses, flood pings, denial of service attacks, or any other harmful code or processes;
    4. Transmit or submit harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, deceptive, fraudulent, obscene, indecent, vulgar, lewd, violent, hateful or otherwise objectionable content or material;
    5. Transmit or submit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, or spam;
    6. Stalk or harass any user or visitor to the Site; or
    7. Use the content or information available on the Site for any improper purpose.
  5. You retain the Copyright of any “Comment” you submit to Discerning the World. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to grant Discerning the World a irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license to use the material or commentary that you have submitted, in any medium and in any manner that Discerning the World may, in its sole unfettered discretion, choose.
  6. By submitting a “Comment” to Discerning the World, you agree to comply with the following rules concerning such submissions:
    1.  You agree not to include in your “Comment”:
      1. Any false, defamatory, libelous, abusive, threatening, racially offensive, sexually explicit, obscene, harmful, vulgar, hateful, illegal, or otherwise objectionable content;
      2. Any content that may be seen as stalking or harassing of any other Site contributors;
      3. Any content that personally attacks an individual. (An example of a personal attack is posting negative comments about an individual in a way meant to demean that person. Note that posting your opinion about someone’s ideas, doctrine or actions is not a personal attack);
      4. Any content that discloses private details concerning any person, for eg., phone numbers that have not been made public, photos that are not in the public domain, residential address that is not public, ID numbers, Social Security numbers, email addresses that are not in the public domain, etc.;
      5. Any content that you know to be false, misleading, or fraudulent;
      6. Any use of profanity;
      7. Any content including advertisements or otherwise focused on the promotion of commercial events or businesses, or any request for or solicitation of money, goods, or services for private gain;
      8. Any content that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or
      9. Any content directly or indirectly soliciting responses from minors (defined as anyone under 18 years of age).
    1. If any part of the “Comment” is not your original work, it is your responsibility to add the name of the third party, name the book with page number or a link (url) to the website where you obtained the information.
    2. Your “Comment” may contain Copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. You are however allowed to make such material available in your “Comment” in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.  This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this Site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
    3. If you wish to use copyrighted material from a website or any other medium for purposes to add to your “Comment” that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. (Fair Use means you may quote from copyrighted sources, but you may not publish the whole article, book, etc., in your “Comment”.)
  8. You are solely responsible for the “Comment” you upload, post, transmit or otherwise make available to others using this Web Site. Under no circumstances will Discerning the World be liable in any way for any “Comment” posted on or made available through this Site by you or any third party.
  9. You understand that all “Comments” on this Site are pre-screened or moderated. That means that every “Comment” needs to be approved by Discerning the World before it appears in the “Comments” section.  This is not an automatic process.  Discerning the World does this for SPAM reasons.
  10. Discerning the World has the right (but not the obligation) in their sole unfettered discretion to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or available through the Site. Without limiting the foregoing, Discerning the World has the right to remove any “Comment” that violates these Terms or is otherwise deemed objectionable by Discerning the World in its sole discretion.
  11. You understand that Discerning the World in their sole unfettered discretion is not obligated and can not be forced in any manner, be it legal or otherwise to remove any “Comment” that is posted on or made available through the Site by you.
  12. When submitting a “Comment,” you will be asked to provide your name and your email address. While Discerning the World does not object to your use of a pseudonym instead of your actual name, Discerning the World reserves the right, but not the obligation, to reject, change, disallow, or discontinue at any time any submission name that, in Discerning the World’s sole unfettered discretion, is objectionable or inappropriate for any reason. Discerning the World requires the submission of your email address, but Discerning the World warrants that it will not publish your email address to an outside third party without your consent.
  13. Discerning the World does not sell or rent your personal information to third parties for their marketing purposes. From time to time, Discerning the World may contact you personally via email. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge and understand that the “Comments” feature of the Site is designed to permit users to post information and commentary for public review and comment and thus you hereby waive any expectation of privacy you may have concerning any likeness or information provided to the Site by you.
  14. You are solely responsible for your interactions with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    1. Discerning the World shall have the right, but not the obligation, to monitor interactions utilizing the “Comments” facility of the Site, between you and other users of or visitors to the Site. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World, or any third party shall not be, and you shall not seek to hold them, responsible for any harm or damage whatsoever arising in connection with your interaction with other users of or visitors to the Site.
    2. Discerning the World does not verify any information posted to or communicated via the “Comments” sections of the Site by users and does not guarantee the proper use of such information by any party who may have access to the information. You acknowledge and agree that Discerning the World does not assume, and shall not have, any responsibility for the content of messages or other communications sent or received by users of the Site.
  15. The Site contains content created by or on behalf of Discerning the World as well as content provided by third parties.
    1. Discerning the World does not control, and makes no representations or warranties about, any third party content, including such content that may be accessible directly on the Site or through links from the Site to third party sites.
    2. You acknowledge that, by viewing the Site or communications transmitted through the Site, you may be exposed to third party content that is false, offensive or otherwise objectionable to you or others, and you agree that under no circumstances shall Discerning the World be liable in any way, under any theory, for any third party content.
    3. You acknowledge and agree that the Site, and the contents thereof, is proprietary to Discerning the World and is protected by copyright. You agree that you will not access or use the Site or any of the content thereof for any reason or purpose other than your personal, non-commercial use.
    4. You agree that you will not systematically retrieve data or other content from the Site by any means, and you will not compile a database or directory of information extracted from the Site.
    5. You agree that you will not reproduce, distribute or make derivative works of the Site or any of the contents thereof without the express consent of Discerning the World.
    6. You hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Discerning the World, its affiliates and licensees, and all of their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives from and against any and all liabilities, losses, claims, damages, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) in connection with any claim arising out of your use of the Site or violation of any of these Terms.



16. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between Discerning the World and you with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede any previous oral or written agreement between us with respect to such subject matter.

Thank you!