Back in the day gifts were bestowed on the disciples that they would be able to go out and spread the gospel of Jesus Christ successfully. One of the gifts was the ability to speak in tongues. Many people today who speak in tongues seem to think that tongues is a heavenly language. But this is not true. Genuine tongues is an earthly language. The gift given to the disciples enabled them to communicate with people from other nations who spoke other languages, how else could they spread the gospel.
All genuine Christians believe that the gift of tongues existed as mentioned in Scripture.
1 Corinthians 12:8-11 “8To one is given in and through the [Holy] Spirit [the power to speak] a message of wisdom, and to another [the power to express] a word of knowledge and understanding according to the same [Holy] Spirit; 9To another [wonder-working] faith by the same [Holy] Spirit, to another the extraordinary powers of healing by the one Spirit; 10To another the working of miracles, to another prophetic insight (the gift of interpreting the divine will and purpose); to another the ability to discern and distinguish between [the utterances of true] spirits [and false ones], to another various kinds of [unknown] tongues, to another the ability to interpret [such] tongues. 11All these [gifts, achievements, abilities] are inspired and brought to pass by one and the same [Holy] Spirit, Who apportions to each person individually [exactly] as He chooses”.
Verse 10 mentions the gift of speaking in tongues and also mentions the gift of interpreting tongues. These were only given as a special gift by the Holy Spirit and can not be acquired by any other manner. No one person had all the gifts as God is sovereign and can bestow His gifts on who He chooses.
When a person accepts Jesus Christ into their life they instantly receive the Holy Spirit who comes to abide in them - this alone is a gift.
Do not confuse tongues as being a fruit of the Spirit. The fruit of the Spirit is evidence of being filled with the Holy Spirit. The fruits of the Spirit are mentioned in:
Galatians 5:22-23; “22But the fruit of the [Holy] Spirit [the work which His presence within accomplishes] is love, joy (gladness), peace, patience (an even temper, forbearance), kindness, goodness (benevolence), faithfulness,23Gentleness (meekness, humility), self-control (self-restraint, continence). Against such things there is no law [that can bring a charge].”
Glossolalia: Greek glossa which means language or tongue and lalia which means speech. The word Glossolalia as it stands in the bible has always referred to ‘speaking a language or tonuge’.
In Mark 16:17 it says; “17And these attesting signs will accompany those who believe: in My name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new languages.”
New languages refers to speaking in a new earthly language. It will not be their mother tongue but a tongue that is unknown to them. When the disciples came to speak in another language, another disciple was given at that point in time the gift to interpret what was being said in their own language so they too could understand.
Acts 2:4 says, “4And they were all filled (diffused throughout their souls) with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other (different, foreign) languages (tongues), as the Spirit kept giving them clear and loud expression [in each tongue in appropriate words].”
And then there were those who heard them:
Acts 2:6-8; ”6And when this sound was heard, the multitude came together and they were astonished and bewildered, because each one heard them [the apostles] speaking in his own [particular] dialect. 7And they were beside themselves with amazement, saying, Are not all these who are talking Galileans? 8Then how is it that we hear, each of us, in our own (particular) dialect to which we were born?”.
So here we have Galileans speaking the other people’s dialects.
The gift of tongues was solely for the purpose of preaching the gospel to other nations.
For someone to quote scripture from Corinthians to back up speaking in babble (tongues) as being biblical is ridiculous to say the least. Paul rebuked the Corinthians over and over again because they did not understand the gospel. Paul scolded the Corinthians for misusing the gift and making a mockery of the OT fulfilment of prophecy by Isaiah. This prophecy came about due to Israel’s disobedience to God.
Isaiah 28:11; ”11No, but [the Lord will teach the rebels in a more humiliating way] by men with stammering lips and another tongue will He speak to this people [says Isaiah, and teach them His lessons].”
Paul points out the OT Scripture of Isaiah 28:11 to the Corinthians because they (being Jews) should know the Law well…but they don’t.
1 Corinthians 12:21; “In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord”.
Paul uses the reference to Isaiah to show them how they lack in knowing OT scripture, therefore they lack even more when it comes to the gospel. Isaiah specifically says that tongues will be used as a tool to preach the word of God to Israel, not the way the Corinthians are using it. It also says that even though they hear the word of God they still will not listen.
The gift of tongues was used as a sign only to unbelievers:
1 Corinthians 14:22 ”22Thus [unknown] tongues are meant for a [supernatural] sign, not for believers but for unbelievers [on the point of believing], while prophecy (inspired preaching and teaching, interpreting the divine will and purpose) is not for unbelievers [on the point of believing] but for believers.”
To use tongues in any other way is unbiblical and again it was an earthly language and when used the gospel was preached and people were saved because they heard the message and were on the verge of believing.
The Corinthians turned tongues speaking into a mockery. They used it for self glory and self gratification and they puffed themselves up making one person seem more spiritual than another. Paul lambastes them and calls the Corinthians spiritually immature and childish in their thinking.
1 Corinthians 14:20 ”20Brethren, do not be children [immature] in your thinking; continue to be babes in [matters of] evil, but in your minds be mature [men].”
The Corinthians never grew up. They remained spiritually immature. They failed to study the scriptures just like those churches today who follow the Corinthian blueprint.
Hebrews 5:12-14 “12For even though by this time you ought to be teaching others, you actually need someone to teach you over again the very first principles of God’s Word. You have come to need milk, not solid food. 13For everyone who continues to feed on milk is obviously inexperienced and unskilled in the doctrine of righteousness (of conformity to the divine will in purpose, thought, and action), for he is a mere infant [not able to talk yet]! 14But solid food is for full-grown men, for those whose senses and mental faculties are trained by practice to discriminate and distinguish between what is morally good and noble and what is evil and contrary either to divine or human law.”
The Corinthians thought they were so spiritual but the Bible says they were manifesting carnality:
1 Corinthians 3:1; “HOWEVER, BRETHREN, I could not talk to you as to spiritual [men], but as to nonspiritual [men of the flesh, in whom the carnal nature predominates], as to mere infants [in the new life] in Christ [unable to talk yet!]“
And there was even gross sin among these spiritual Corinthians:
1 Corinthians 5:1; ” IT IS actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, impurity of a sort that is condemned and does not occur even among the heathen; for a man has [his own] father’s wife.”
The gift of tongues was a temporary gift bestowed on people by the Holy Spirit…
- To preach the gospel
- As a sign to confirm the gospel message preached because people would come to be saved thereafter.
- The fulfilment of OT scripture.
Once the Bible was written the gift of tongues ceased and was replaced by love and truth.
1 Corinthians 13:8 ”Love never fails [never fades out or becomes obsolete or comes to an end]. As for prophecy (the gift of interpreting the divine will and purpose), it will be fulfilled and pass away; as for tongues, they will be destroyed and cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away [it will lose its value and be superseded by truth].”
Truth = The Word of God
Paul says that LOVE never fails and this leads us to the 2 commandments that Jesus spoke about in
Mark 12:30-31 and they are: 30And you shall love the Lord your God out of and with your whole heart and out of and with all your soul (your life) and out of and with all your mind (with your faculty of thought and your moral understanding) and out of and with all your strength. This is the first and principal commandment. 31The second is like it and is this, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. There is no other commandment greater than these.“
The gift of prophecy too shall be entirely unnecessary as the Bible contains everything you need to know for yesterday, today and tomorrow. God has a stern warning for those with new words, new revelations that fall outside of scripture:
Revelation 22:18 ”if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book”.
In those days Paul and the other Apostles wrote and prophesied in part – in other words they did not know everything until it was give to them by the Holy Spirit. Paul said in…
1 Corinthians 13:8-11; “9For our knowledge is fragmentary (incomplete and imperfect), and our prophecy (our teaching) is fragmentary (incomplete and imperfect). 10But when the complete and perfect (total) comes, the incomplete and imperfect will vanish away (become antiquated, void, and superseded). 11When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child; now that I have become a man, I am done with childish ways and have put them aside.
The perfect = The Word of God
Truth = The Word of God
The imperfect, the incomplete = Tongues, prophecy and knowledge CEASED!
When you are a born again Christian you do away with childish things and study the Word of God ONLY as it is perfect in every way.
Today speaking in tongues and prophesying is self-induced or demonic. If you speak in tongues I urge you to read your Bible and study the matter urgently and rid yourself of this childish behaviour or worse, demonic affliction.
Dueling Tongues from Acts2031 on Vimeo.
Now here’s one that ought to receive some very interesting and diverse opinion from Charismatic, Charismatic Catholic and other related sources. I have recently read some, dare I say hilarious, articles on this subject. The perceived and manufactured variety of ‘tongues’ now rivals only the circumstances under which they are ‘received’.
Just yesterday I happened across an article which explains the added effects that the ‘Words of Wisdom tongue’ and the ‘Words of Knowledge tongue’ include. Apparently one can hear the voices of angels, demons and Jesus along with these ‘gifts’. I don’t doubt that claim for a moment, considering the origin…
Of course, all which you have correctly mentioned in your article here, has been prolifically disputed and ‘disproved’ in all media forms and from New Age pulpits world over. I anticipate lively counter argument and refutation of this article from obvious sources.
Grant
I spent hours on this article and studying scripture. It would devistate me if someone were to come and give their ‘diverse’ opinion. hehe.
My favourite is the Thunder Tongue. Apparently it sounds like thunder when others hear it. Hmm.
Why would the Holy Spirit speak in funny tongues that no one can understand in front of a whole congragation…
Rom 8:26
(26) Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
It is self evident in the verse above that the groanings of the Holy Spirit CANNOT BE UTTERED
I thank my God everyday for he is good and He doesnt expect me to do any strange thing to show him that I love Him, in Truth we worhip Him, what an amazing Father we have!and isn’t his love so simple to understand!!!! with just a requirement, to love Him with all our hearts and souls for what He has done for us, nothing more and nothing less,praise Him for ever and ever.
thx for this! You just managed to answer all my questions I ever had on this topic!
Jemah
Right on….
I have shared this before. Neville Norden from Lewende Woord church in Pretoria says if one cannot speak in tongues it is because of lack of knowledge or ignorance. It is absolutely insane to say this to someone. Lewende Woord is as I see it a false church with false teachings as there are other false teachings like his Prophetic School ect.
Proof of what I am saying can be found at link chapter 8 page 183. The thesis was done in Afrikaans. I have tried to copy an paste article piece applicable but the pdf doc is locked.
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/submitted/etd-11102006-164248/unrestricted/03chapter8.pdf
I have made this comment on another thread also. This was my comment:
http://www.discerningtheworld.com/2010/03/01/benny-hinn-miracle-service-in-durban-13-mar-2010/
Maybe because God understands it.
Deborah
Aah yes, Thunder Tongue, first heard at the Thunder Dome. Frankie went there, too I think, or was that the Pleasure Dome or the Coca Cola dome, can’t remember:) Not important.
But I suppose we should not make too light of a subject which has had tragic implications for some. Thousands who have been deceived by the incredible falsities of preachers and pastors who have destroyed the fledgling faith of many who were told that their salvation depended on having faith enough to speak in gibberish tongues. The same false preachers and pastors who make Christianity seem cheap, ludicrous, pretentious and false. These bad shepherds truly allow themselves to become an embarrassment to the Christian faith and true believers.
Although there are many other passages warning us about these deceivers, see what Jeremiah says about them. He is not addressing tongues, per se, but also the lies:
Jer 23:31 Behold, I am against the prophets, declares the LORD, who use their tongues and declare, ‘declares the LORD.’
Jer 23:32 Behold, I am against those who prophesy lying dreams, declares the LORD, and who tell them and lead my people astray by their lies and their recklessness, when I did not send them or charge them. So they do not profit this people at all, declares the LORD.
Again, concerning those who have been driven from the faith by false expectations of the teachers:
Jer 23:1 “Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture!” declares the LORD.
Jer 23:2 Therefore thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, concerning the shepherds who care for my people: “You have scattered my flock and have driven them away, and you have not attended to them. Behold, I will attend to you for your evil deeds, declares the LORD.
More recently, Peter comforts us:
2Pe 2:1 But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.
Jemah
You read the whole verse and did not stop after the word ‘groanings’. That is why you understand it perfectly. Thank you for being a Berean and as always for being gentle. Your faith speaks for itself.
Further to your verse Romans 8:26, it is also quite evident that the Spirit maketh intercession for us . Not through us, but on our behalf.
Also, what would be the purpose of having those groanings uttered among men? 1, they would not understand the meaning, and 2, what could we be expecting men to do for us? Thus it is pretty clear that those ‘groanings’ are made by the Spirit, on our behalf, before God.
You are so right: it is really so, so simple and perfect.
Patrick
Impressive but wrong answer. What would you say to a deaf and mute person?
The tongues issue is a stumbling block to those (especially) new-born Christians and sadly… any issue that causes confusion is not the will of God…who sent His Son to save us from our sins.
When any controversy becomes an issue and takes your focus away from the message of Calvary…then it is best left alone because it is a diversion. Avoid churches,teachings and church leaders who advocate this…and seek out God by prayer and reading His Word with a sincere heart. The answer will come. The really sad thing is that there are genuine reborn-christians trapped in this question.
First, let me say I have the utmost respect for Deborah and gang and this website. I am fully aware of the craziness that surrounds the use of tongues and it sickens me because it is either of the flesh or Satan and an embarrassment to the Body of Christ.
However, having said that, I do believe it is appropriate to hear another viewpoint. There is a balanced view that I believe is worthy of hearing. I know mature Christians who stand for biblical truth. Some of them speak in tongues (NOT in congregational settings, but rather in their prayer closets or intimate prayer settings.) I knew equally as many who do not have this gift – just as any other gift it is not an indicator of spiritual maturity or superiority. I do not for one moment believe that the brothers/sisters who have the gift of tongues are serving Satan and they would immediately abandon anything not pleasing to their Savior. They are not Pentecostal or Dominionist or even involved in charismania. They do not believe the office of apostle or prophet is for today.
This is lengthy, but explains the position of those who acknowledge the gifts are valid for our day. I don’t know the author but it is representative of the balanced view on the topic held by some today.
The gift of tongues is one of those gifts which has been surrounded by controversy in the church for many years. Many of the main-line denominations believe that the gift of tongues was an apostolic gift which meant that it was only necessary in the church during the time of the apostles to kick-start the church.
As a result, many of those denominations do not promote this gift because they deny its existence for today. On the other end of the spectrum, all of the Pentecostal and Charismatic churches believe in and promote the gift of tongues.
We fall into the latter category which I believe is a biblical position on the gift of tongues. However, unlike most of our Pentecostal and Charismatic brethren, we teach a balanced biblical position on the use of this gift as the Spirit has revealed its use in the word of God.
So, let’s jump right into this area. The word tongues in the N.T. is (glossa) in the Greek. And as with all languages, many words can mean different things depending on the context.
The word tongue in the Greek can mean different things depending on the context. We read in JAM 3:5 “Likewise the tongue is a small part of the body, but it makes great boasts. Consider what a great forest is set on fire by a small spark.”
Here the tongue (glossa) is that organ just inside your mouth which gives you the ability to speak.
Over in the book of Acts we find another use of the word glossa or tongue. We read in ACT 2:3 “They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them.”
Here the word glossa or tongues is not a physical part of the body, but is an expression describing a phenomenon of the Spirit descending upon the believers.
But the next verse in ACT 2:4 says, “All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.”
And so here the word glossa or tongue describes the language a person might use as his physical tongue is engaged to speak. And it’s this last description which we’re concerned with as we look into a gift of the Holy Spirit which enables a believer in Christ Jesus to speak in a language which that person never before learned.
We’ll discover what this gift is used for in the Body of Christ and how it must be properly understood according to the word of God.
The first time we see this gift spoken of in the in the N.T. is when Jesus said in MAR 16:15 “He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation.
16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
17 And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues;…”
Here the word tongues, which is glossa in the Greek, infers new languages. Jesus means to say that one of the signs which will accompany faith in Christ is that some will speak in new languages which are not natural to their ability to communicate.
Now, some have misunderstood Jesus’ words in Mark and have concluded that every believer will be able to drive out demons; every believer will be able to speak in a new tongue; and that every believer, according to MAR 16:18, “will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well.”
This is not what Jesus is teaching as Paul will explain in his letter to the Corinthians, as he describes that it is the Spirit who gives gifts according to His will, and that not everyone will have the exact same gifts. We are a Body made up of many members.
But Jesus’ prophecy was in fact fulfilled on the day of Pentecost. Jesus was referring to the outpouring of the Spirit which was spoken of through the Prophet Joel.
JOE 2:28 “And afterward, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, your young men will see visions.
29 Even on my servants, both men and women, I will pour out my Spirit in those days.”
And it is this portion of Scripture in the O.T. which Peter quotes in describing what was fulfilled on the day of Pentecost when the disciples spoke with other languages. And it is on the day of Pentecost when for the first time the gift of tongues is given by the Spirit.
ACT 2:4 “All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.
5 Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven.
6 When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language.
7 Utterly amazed, they asked: “Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans?
8 Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language?”
There were many different people in Jerusalem that day from different parts of the world who spoke different languages other than Hebrew or Greek. And as the disciples were filled with the Spirit they began speaking in the languages of these people.
Some disciples spoke in the language of the Parthians, some spoke in the language of the Medes and some in the language of the Elamites and others spoke the languages of the residents of the Mesopotamians and so on; 16 different areas of the world are mentioned and probably different dialects within those regions.
Some have suggested that the disciples were speaking their own language and that the miracle was in the hearing so that these people heard them speak in their own language. I don’t believe this to be the case. Peter understood what was going on because he heard it as well when he defended the disciples who were accused of being drunk as they babbled in these different languages.
He responded in ACT 2:15 “These men are not drunk, as you suppose. It’s only nine in the morning!
16 No, this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel:
17 “‘In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams.”
The “all people” in verse 17 is understood to mean all those whom God comes upon with His Spirit who we are told are those who believe. The crowd, up to this point, had not believed. The gift of the Spirit is placed upon those who are indwelt with the Spirit; believing Christians.
The Spirit had come upon the disciples and enabled them to fulfill Joel’s prophecy as they were able to speak in an unlearned language. The crowd simply heard their own language as it was spoken.
Some may argue that this would be next to impossible for this vast crowd gathered around the disciples to understand the disciples who were each speaking a different language. However, this is not really that unusual. If you were in a crowd of people, all speaking an unknown language, and one of them began to speak in English guess who you’d tune in to and recognize what they were saying?
This was the case in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost and what amazed the people was that they knew these disciples were not learned men who were able to know these different languages. Peter says, ‘that’s right, this is a work of the Holy Spirit according to word of God foretold by Joel.’
And for you and I this is essential to understand when it comes to this gift in our lives. Whether it’s the gift of discernment or the gift of tongues or any other gift, it is the Spirit who must give it.
In describing the different gifts of the Spirit in 1Cor.12:11, Paul says, “All these are the work of one and the same Spirit, and he gives them to each one, just as he determines.”
A gift is just that, a gift. We don’t earn it or deserve it. And though we may ask for gifts, which is certainly proper, it is ultimately up to the Holy Spirit who determines who He will give certain gifts to. More often than not the Holy Spirit gifts you even before you ask.
This is why some Pentecostals, who insist that the evidence of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit must be the speaking in tongues, are ABSOLUTELY WRONG. Some get the gift and some don’t. Paul uses rhetorical reasoning when he assumes that not everyone will have the same gifts.
1CO 12:29 “Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles?
30 Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret?”
What do you suppose the implied answer is? No, not everyone in the Body of Christ will be an apostle; no, not everyone in the Body will work miracles or have gifts of healing; and no, not all will speak in tongues.
To suggest that “the evidence” for the Baptism of the Holy Spirit is an unknown tongue is to miss “the most important” evidence of the Spirit’s work which is not a particular gift, but the fruit of the Spirit which every believer is called upon to exhibit.
That’s where Paul was going when he wrote in 1CO 12:31 “But eagerly desire the greater gifts. And now I will show you the most excellent way.
13:1 If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.”
It is the love of Christ shed abroad in our hearts which is to be the evidence of the Spirit’s work in our lives, because (agape) love will not glory in any particular gift, it will reach out to others with the love of Christ found in the gospel of our Lord which is the power unto salvation.
To place a spiritual gift, which will one day be taken away at the consummation of Christ’s plan, at the forefront of our lives, as the evidence, once again puts “us” in the spot light instead of Christ, whose love will never come to an end.
And so simply because you do not presently have the gift of tongues does not necessarily mean you have not been baptized with the Holy Spirit. I wish I could convey to you how many people I’ve known over the years who have been devastated because some misguided “Christian” told them they didn’t have the Spirit because they didn’t speak in tongues.
Paul makes it clear. Some do and some don’t. I for one will rest on the word of God any day, rather than be discouraged by someone who feels that their particular gift of tongues is the litmus test for spirituality. May I remind you that the Corinthian Church had the gift of tongues being exercised in their community and yet Paul rebukes them for being immature in the faith; not exercising the fruit of the Spirit.
Spiritual maturity is never measured by how much someone practices a particular gift, it is measured by how much you love Christ and your neighbor as yourself. Remember, “If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.” (1CO 13:1)
By the way, I might add that if you do not have the “gift” of tongues and you desire to, you can certainly come to God and ask.
But what’s the purpose of this gift of tongues? Again, we go to the word of God and we find a consistent pattern to the use of this gift. There on the day of Pentecost we see that what the crowds heard the disciples speaking was “the wonders of God!” The KJV puts it, “the wonderful works of God!” And the NASB puts it, “the mighty deeds of God!”
The disciples were simply praising God and declaring His greatness. It wasn’t until Peter described what was happening that he then went on to declare the gospel of Jesus Christ, probably in either Aramaic or koine Greek, which most of the people would have understood.
Aramaic might make more sense since the people Peter is addressing are mostly Jews as we read in ACT 2:14 “Then Peter stood up with the Eleven, raised his voice and addressed the crowd: “Fellow Jews and all of you who live in Jerusalem, let me explain this to you; listen carefully to what I say.”
Keep in mind that the day of Pentecost was a Jewish holy day that Jews would have been involved in along with some converts from the Gentile world. This is the very reason all of these different Jews from all over the known world were in Jerusalem at this time.
And by the way, this answers the question as to what someone is doing when the gift of tongues is practiced then and today in the church. Keep in mind what the people heard in Jerusalem on that day. They heard the disciples speaking the wonders of God, declaring His greatness. The crowds simply heard the disciples praising God which is consistent with the way this gift is meant to be used.
Paul addresses this in 1CO 14:2 “For anyone who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. Indeed, no one understands him; he utters mysteries with his spirit.”
If you’ve ever been in a place where someone was speaking in tongues you may have noticed that much of the time the interpretation is not given, and we’ll deal with that a little later, but in those instances where there is an interpretation more often than not it may sound something like, ‘My little children I love you and I will never forsake you and you will be My witnesses to the utter most parts of the world.’
That’s very encouraging, but it is not an interpretation to the tongue. How do we know that? Because the gift of tongues is not directed toward men, but to God, according to what we just read n 1Cor.14:2.
The interpretation I just used as an example was directed to men, not God. And so, instead of an interpretation to the tongue in the example I just gave, it was more than likely the gift of prophecy being used.
If a proper use of the gift of interpretation was utilized the interpretation would be closer to praises to God, or prayer or thanksgiving to God, or just declaring His greatness.
One of the things about the gift of tongues is that the utterances are given by the Holy Spirit. These utterances are not the result of you trying to create a language, which some in the church have done, precisely because of peer pressure. Also, one does not have control over which language one is given, although you do have control over the use of the gift.
What I mean is that when you begin to praise God with your new tongue, the language you use is what the Spirit gives you. But you can start and stop as you choose. It’s not as though you’re out of control and God has taken over your mouth with you just being an unwilling by-stander until He’s done.
With the way this gift is practiced often times in the church you would think this is the case, but like the gift of prophecy, the recipient does have control. As Paul says in 1CO 14:32 “The spirits of prophets are subject to the control of prophets.
33 For God is not a God of disorder but of peace…”
Your desire to praise God with your new tongue may seem overwhelming, but to suggest that we have no control over our senses, which includes our ability to speak, is to miss the point of how the Spirit works.
The reason we know this is because of what the word of God tells us about another gift which is the gift of interpretation of tongues. The gift of interpretation is a sister gift of tongues, if you will, which the Spirit gives so that what is said in an unknown tongue, may then be understood within the Body of Christ for the church’s edification.
Paul says in 1CO 14:28 “If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God.”
And so the gift of tongues is in the control of the speaker and if there is no one with the gift of interpretation the speaker should not speak out loud in the congregation, but may certainly speak to himself and to God without disturbing anyone near him.
By the way, this does not mean one cannot speak out loud in your own prayer closet. I knew a woman who had the gift of tongues and always wondered what she was saying when she was home praising her God. She evidently prayed to God one night for the interpretation and God gave it to her and she was doubly blessed.
I’ll get back to the gift of interpretation in a moment. Some have asked, what’s the point of the gift of tongues? Why is it necessary to speak to God in an unlearned language, and is it really a language like French or German?
Well, to answer the second question, yes, it really is a language like French or German or any other language the Spirit decides to use in your life. Again, we go back to Pentecost and we see that the disciples spoke in languages which actually existed.
The whole point of languages, which by the way, is something that God gave man from day one, is to communicate, either with God or one another. And so the gift of tongues is designed for us to communicate with God. We may not understand the language and that’s why Paul says in 1CO 14:14 “For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful.”
In other words, my spirit rejoices within me as I praise God, but my mind doesn’t get blessed in the process because I don’t understand the language. And this is the reason for the gift of interpretation, which is why Paul also says in 1CO 14:13 “For this reason anyone who speaks in a tongue should pray that he may interpret what he says.”
Getting back to the language aspect for a moment. In 1CO 13:1 we read, “If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.”
Some would say that the languages spoken are not always earthly languages at all, but may include the language of angels. First of all, we don’t know how angels communicate in the heavenlies. Do they need language as we understand it? We know they communicate with the Lord, but we can’t say with any certainty what language it is.
But the point of 1Cor.13:1 is not to teach that we can imitate the language of angels. Rather Paul is simply using hyperbole to make a point. The point he was making that even if he could speak with the tongues of men or angels but didn’t have love it wouldn’t make any difference. It would still be useless.
But for the sake of argument, let’s assume there is a language of angels which we can use. God would still be able to give the interpretation for that language and that language would be used to direct our prayers and praises to Him.
But there may be other languages which the Spirit may give which are not used in the world today. The ancient language of Greek is not in use today. The ancient language of English is not in use today. In fact, you wouldn’t recognize the language which is the source of our present day English language.
Could that language be used today as a means of praising God? Sure, it is a language of men. And if the Spirit decided to give you that language you could certainly use it to honor and worship God.
I remember praising God one night in my bedroom in a language which seemed familiar. When I listened to it closely there were certain words which sounded like the words I’ve read in books and concordances. It sounded like koine Greek. Now I don’t know how koine Greek, which is a dead language, sounded like. But it is a phonetic language and I remember sounding out some of the words when I would do my studies in the word of God.
But there were two words which kept coming up. In fact they were so distinct that I remember writing them down later phonetically. When I went to my concordance later I actually found these two words. They were different and yet they both spoke of the same thing. They spoke of death and dying.
Now, I didn’t get the interpretation, but I suspect that I was praising God for the death of His Son for my sin and that I might continue to die to self and live to Him.
And so whatever language the Spirit gives you, whether a modern language, which would include the thousands of languages in the world today, or an ancient language, or maybe the language of angels, God can and will give the interpretation.
What’s interesting about this is that I’ve had people tell me that when they’ve heard people speaking in tongues in the church it sounded like gibberish or some other strange sound. First, let me say again, that there may people who are speaking gibberish. It may not be the gift of tongues, it may a fleshly manifestation trying to imitate their friends who may in fact be trying to imitate their friends.
But, I would also say that when I’ve heard legitimate languages, like the language which is used in Iraq and Iran, on a news report for example, I have to tell you that even listening closely it does not sound like any language with any sort of linguistic pattern. To me it literally sounds like gibberish. But does it make it any less a legitimate language because I hear it as gibberish? Of course not.
But let’s not lose sight of why the Spirit gives this gift.
1CO 12:4 “There are different kinds of gifts, but the same Spirit.
5 There are different kinds of service, but the same Lord.
6 There are different kinds of working, but the same God works all of them in all men.
7 Now to each one the manifestation of the Spirit is given for the common good.”
It is for the common good of the Body of Christ that this gift, or any gift, is given by the Spirit. In other words, your gift, in this case the gift of tongues, is meant for my good and for my edification when used in a public setting.
We know that the gift of tongues is certainly to edify the one using it whether it’s used in the Body of Christ or in the privacy of their own home. Paul addresses this in 1CO 14:4 “He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church.”
But to use a gift exclusively for self-edification is against all that God intends by His word which clearly says the gifts are to be used for the common good. But again, the question must be raised how does speaking in an unknown language edify the Body of Christ?
Well, first of all it allows the one gifted to raise his voice to God in praises. But that’s not the primary way we are edified with this gift because you can do that in your own language. The way in which we are edified with this gift is to demonstrate the closeness and the intimacy of our God in our midst.
This is a supernatural way of God showing Himself, through the Spirit, that He is in our midst. Remember, we are dealing with God, who is Spirit. In His mercy and grace He has provided a way in which we can actually “see, or hear” Him working in our presence. It’s a personal touch in a way we can understand.
This is why the gift of interpretation of tongues is so important, because this is really where we hear this touch from God. Since we don’t know what the language is, God is pleased to give us the interpretation through someone in the Body. It comes from Him. That’s up close and personal. That’s a God who is close and approachable.
And so the gift of interpretation must be employed when the gift of tongues is used in the Body of Christ in a public setting. Let’s look at where this is found in the scriptures. Turn to 1Cor.14:5-19…
Have you ever been around a group of people who were speaking a language you didn’t understand?
In a way it’s as though you’re being excluded from any interchange with them on a communicating level. You don’t receive anything from them and they can’t receive anything from you. In a setting with other believers who are speaking in an unknown tongue a similar phenomena occurs. No blessing is exchanged.
With the gift of tongues, if you go on in your tongue and I have no understanding of what you’re saying, how can I say Amen to your praises and prayers to God? I am not blessed, and for that matter either are you. Your spirit is, but your mind has no understanding.
And so we should pray for interpretation. A note about interpretation. The Greek word for interpretation literally means to explain thoroughly. This is different from a translation.
To give a translation is to give somewhat of a word-for-word account of what was said, whereas an interpretation is to explain what was said. This is why for example, someone may speak in an unknown tongue for what seems like a long time and yet the interpretation may only take a relatively short time.
But in giving the interpretation the Holy Spirit allows an overview of what was being said. And this is not that unusual in even our regular experiences with languages we do know. For example, I could go on and on and explain the technical aspects of the combustion engine, but then someone could right behind me and sum it up by saying, the spark plug ignites the gas in the piston chamber and an explosion takes place which moves the piston and then eventually transfers the power through the crank case to the wheels.
And that’s often how the interpretation will come to us in the gift of interpretation. Someone may eloquently speak in Parisian French the wonders of God, and someone may interpret that concisely and give a shortened version of what was said so that we may all be edified. But remember, that it is God who is making known the interpretation for the Body to be edified.
But what if someone in the church knew Parisian French, could they give an interpretation? Why not? That however, would not be the gift of interpretation being used in that instance.
Robert Gromacki in his commentary on 1 Corinthians states that there are three goals of this gift of tongues and the gift of interpretation.
1) “It must enlist the participation of others.”
2) “It must give understanding.”
3) “It must promote edification.”
If this is not being accomplished in a setting with other believers then this gift is not being properly used and what it then often results in is chaos and clamor and something like clanging, as Paul puts it. People are not edified in a biblical sense and visitors think you’re nuts.
1CO 14:23 “So if the whole church comes together and everyone speaks in tongues, and some who do not understand or some unbelievers come in, will they not say that you are out of your mind?”
The world already thinks we’re nuts, let’s not remove any doubt by improperly using the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit who gives this gift is also the one who gives us the word of God to lay out the guidelines.
We read in 1CO 14:27 “If anyone speaks in a tongue, two – or at the most three -should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret.
28 If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God.”
This would suggest that there is a time set aside for the gift of tongues to be used . For us it might be during the praise and worship on Sunday morning where we offer a time to edify and encourage the body with your gifts.
Another time might be during prayer on Wednesday evenings as we humble ourselves before the Lord, as we seek His face and seek His direction and nearness in our lives and the life of this church.
In fact, anytime we meet as the body of Christ to worship and praise our Lord, the gifts the Lord has given us may be used to edify and encourage the body. In the case of the gift of tongues God still expects things to be orderly. And so, if this were to occur, only two or three would speak in turn and there would have to be an interpretation for each.
If there was no interpretation then I would gently say that there appears to be no one with the gift of interpretation and so there will not be a need for any further tongues. We would simply forego that gift for that time and allow others to use their gifts or their desire to praise or pray to the Lord in English.
The gift of tongues would never be used during the time of teaching or preaching, again the reason being that that would cause confusion and disorder while the Pastor or teacher is endeavoring to feed Christ’s sheep.
Again, standing up and interrupting the Pastor as he feeds the flock from the word of God does not edify the Body any more than everyone in the church speaking in tongues at the same time does.
1CO 14:39 “Therefore, my brothers, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues.
40 But everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way.”
May we desire the gifts the Spirit has for us and may we use them properly and biblically so that the Body may be edified. And may all be done out of love for Christ and our neighbor to the glory of God.
Burning Lamp
I kinda think Deborah and team crank sounds better :-) gang sounds a bitty uncranky lol lol
Thank you for your lengthy comment :-) It is indeed a balanced view and makes sense and is worthy of hearing or shall i say reading :-) BL thank you !!
Could the author possibly be Pastor Drew Worthen, Calvary Chapel Port Charlotte, Fl
1Cor.12:10 “Gift of Tongues and Interpretation of Tongues”
http://www.cyberstreet.com/calvary/tongint.htm
Please let me know if I am correct. Thank you :-)
Yippers – that is correct. I didn’t credit him or bring Calvary Chapel into it because I thought it might be a distraction. I don’t know him, but I thought it was a good representation of this point of view. My own pastor mentioned in passing one time that he has a prayer language but I have never heard him use it. He doesn’t boast of it and I have never heard anyone in our congreation speak in tongues. I have no idea who does and who doesn’t – it is just not something that is considered a dividing issue – keeping the main things the main things such as salvation and biblical dontrine. There may be a teaching on it as it comes up in regular expository order, but it is never made an issue.
The way that the guys in the video were acting brings shame to the cause of Christ. I have heard of those who are obviously professors, not possessers brag about speaking in tongues. It is obvious that it is gibberish from the pit.
I hope I didn’t offend by offering this viewpoint. I think so much of all of you here and appreciate your ministry so very much. Time and distance may separate us, but I count you as friends and fellow pilgrims waiting and watching for our King to take us home.
Hi BL, Elmarie, and the “Gang” ;-)
I’ve been busy lately, so haven’t been on the computer much, but after reading BL’s post, I’m gonna jump in here briefly to tell of a church I attended in my teen years. They had a very balanced way of dealing with this issue, very much like the article BL posted, where who ever was leading the worship would stop proceedings after anyone spoke out in tongues during worship (It was taught that all things should be done in order, so it wasn’t acceptable to speak in tongues at other times than during a praise & worship part of a meeting), and it would be explained what was happening, for the benefit of any there who may not know, and then it would be stated that we would now wait on the interpretation.
On a rare occasion, there wouldn’t be any such interpretation, so the person concerned was asked to speak to one of the eldership about it.
Discernment was much in evidence in that fellowship, because I remember once a person just spoke out and some of the eldership went and quieted them down, while the Pastor spoke to the congregation about what was happening.
As I recall, the minute this person started talking, I knew it wasn’t right and most others present said much the same. I believe the Holy Spirit alerts us to such things, if we are listening to Him. So much of what happens these days is just showing off and what my Dad used to call ‘soulish’, (as in James 3:15, where the KJV has it; “devilish.”). That passage in James 3 is all about how we use our speech and the pitfalls that are there for those who don’t tread carefully, whether speaking in tongues, or in our everyday speech.
I believe much of the confusion today regarding ‘tongues’ is because people have forgotten to approach the issue with fear and trembling, as we should when dealing with God, whether praising Him, or petitioning Him.
So many people are PROUD of the fact they ‘speak in tongues’, which is the first sign that they actually aren’t doing anything of the kind, as James says in 3:17; “But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.” Whenever these attributes are missing, then you can be pretty sure that the spirit being manifested is not the Holy Spirit, but most often the pride of the person(s) concerned, or another spirit entirely, as in the awful videos we can see of “revival breaking out”. (Shudder).
Thankyou BL for your post, I really appreciate your gentleness of spirit. I don’t speak in tongues much, but I do sing in a language I never learned, always when I’m praising my Lord, and quietly, as I feel it is between me & God. Sometimes I have no words of my own to express to Him what is in my heart, so I just begin to sing as the Holy Spirit gives me the words. If I’m in church I sing quietly, precisely because I don’t want to draw attention to myself.
I don’t really like talking about it much, both because of the negativity that seems to surround the subject and because I don’t want to even appear to be bragging about something that I can claim no credit for and regard as a very precious gift from God. I have had many quite vehement disagreements with people from the “no tongues-no Holy Spirit” camp and even once or twice with some seriously deluded folks who say that if you don’t speak in tongues, you’re not saved!, so I am sympathetic to those christians who’ve been ‘burned’, but I believe that the devil has used this issue to pollute the water and again the vehicle he has used is the pride of ‘christians’, who have not been lovers of the truth.
I hope that my words have not caused offense and would be happy to discuss this issue with anyone who wishes, with Deb’s permission of course. I certainly don’t want to cause any arguments.
Debate I can handle, and welcome, as long as we can do it in the spirit of the verse I quoted above.
God’s richest blessings on you all,
Alan.
Burning Lamp,
yeps I think you are right, that speaking in tongues(angelic tongues) is in existence today but for the edification of oneself and the church, at times when one speaks to the Father it undoubtedly happens to speak in another language, I for myself can say that this happened to me a long time ago when I didnt even know about tongues, I was praying and then this thing happened, I spoke in another language unknown to me,later I joined this church where speaking in tongues was a (prerequisite) to prove that one was truly reborn, I heard people repeating the same things over and over again, trying to be louder than everybody else,I was dumfounded and asked howcome the Holy Spirit would speak in such a way and I suppose after they told that when one speaks in an unknown language one starts with baby words I felt that there should be something wrong for tha Holy Spirit is not a baby, this would liken to how some worship baby Jesus.
Needless to say I thank God for having kept my eyes open to see the apostacy and I have left that church.I just want to add that today nothing is impossible for God to do and that if one approaches Him with Love and respect putting him first in all things, denying the ego of the flesh one will truly come to know what is from Him and what is not, sometimes when one speaks to Him there are no words to explain what we feel in our hearts so let us let the Holy Spirit lead and help us if it is His will that our hearts should be opened before Him.I do not pray in tongues before any human for it is just between my Lord God and me and I can say it is not something that can be initiated at will and certainly something not to boast about for this will certainly raise confusion, so I hope you understand my take on this subject matter most importantly is to walk in the Spirit and go where the Spirit Leads as far as my spirit is concerned I know I am led to a closer communion with My Abba, my father, My dad, as far as the outside world is concerned I am led to wait for the unmistakle instruction of the Holy Spirit before I act, for my mind I know can be very fruitful and the separation between soul and spirit a difficult task indeed, may we all be blessed to know the will of our wonderful and almighty God!for our lives.
Ok now Im waiting for the bombardments…
I found this on my fave little spot.
“What is the gift of speaking in tongues?”
Answer: The first occurrence of speaking in tongues occurred on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2:1-4. The apostles went out and shared the gospel with the crowds, speaking to them in their own languages: “We hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!” (Acts 2:11). The Greek word translated tongues literally means “languages.” Therefore, the gift of tongues is speaking in a language a person does not know in order to minister to someone who does speak that language. In 1 Corinthians chapters 12–14, Paul discusses miraculous gifts, saying, “Now, brothers, if I come to you and speak in tongues, what good will I be to you, unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or word of instruction?” (1 Corinthians 14:6). According to the apostle Paul, and in agreement with the tongues described in Acts, speaking in tongues is valuable to the one hearing God’s message in his or her own language, but it is useless to everyone else unless it is interpreted/translated.
A person with the gift of interpreting tongues (1 Corinthians 12:30) could understand what a tongues-speaker was saying even though he did not know the language that was being spoken. The tongues interpreter would then communicate the message of the tongues speaker to everyone else, so all could understand. “For this reason anyone who speaks in a tongue should pray that he may interpret what he says” (1 Corinthians 14:13). Paul’s conclusion regarding tongues that were not interpreted is powerful: “But in the church I would rather speak five intelligible words to instruct others than ten thousand words in a tongue” (1 Corinthians 14:19).
Is the gift of tongues for today? First Corinthians 13:8 mentions the gift of tongues ceasing, although it connects the ceasing with the arrival of the “perfect” in 1 Corinthians 13:10. Some point to a difference in the tense of the Greek verbs referring to prophecy and knowledge “ceasing” and that of tongues “being ceased” as evidence for tongues ceasing before the arrival of the “perfect.” While possible, this is not explicitly clear from the text. Some also point to passages such as Isaiah 28:11 and Joel 2:28-29 as evidence that speaking in tongues was a sign of God’s oncoming judgment. First Corinthians 14:22 describes tongues as a “sign to unbelievers.” According to this argument, the gift of tongues was a warning to the Jews that God was going to judge Israel for rejecting Jesus Christ as Messiah. Therefore, when God did in fact judge Israel (with the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in A.D. 70), the gift of tongues would no longer serve its intended purpose. While this view is possible, the primary purpose of tongues being fulfilled does not necessarily demand its cessation. Scripture does not conclusively assert that the gift of speaking in tongues has ceased.
At the same time, if the gift of speaking in tongues were active in the church today, it would be performed in agreement with Scripture. It would be a real and intelligible language (1 Corinthians 14:10). It would be for the purpose of communicating God’s Word with a person of another language (Acts 2:6-12). It would be in agreement with the command God gave through the apostle Paul, “If anyone speaks in a tongue, two—or at the most three—should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God” (1 Corinthians 14:27-28). It would also be in accordance with 1 Corinthians 14:33, “For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.”
God most definitely can give a person the gift of speaking in tongues to enable him or her to communicate with a person who speaks another language. The Holy Spirit is sovereign in the dispersion of the spiritual gifts (1 Corinthians 12:11). Just imagine how much more productive missionaries could be if they did not have to go to language school, and were instantly able to speak to people in their own language. However, God does not seem to be doing this. Tongues does not seem to occur today in the manner it did in the New Testament, despite the fact that it would be immensely useful. The vast majority of believers who claim to practice the gift of speaking in tongues do not do so in agreement with the Scriptures mentioned above. These facts lead to the conclusion that the gift of tongues has ceased or is at least a rarity in God’s plan for the church today.
http://www.gotquestions.org/gift-of-tongues.html
“What is praying in tongues? Is praying in tongues a prayer language between a believer and God?”
Answer: As a background, please read our article on the gift of speaking in tongues. There are four primary Scripture passages that are cited as evidence for praying in tongues: Romans 8:26; 1 Corinthians 14:4-17; Ephesians 6:18; and Jude verse 20. Ephesians 6:18 and Jude 20 mention “praying in the Spirit.” However, tongues as a prayer language is not a likely interpretation of “praying in the Spirit.”
Romans 8:26 teaches us, “In the same way, the Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groans that words cannot express.” Two key points make it highly unlikely that Romans 8:26 is referring to tongues as a prayer language. First, Romans 8:26 states that it is the Spirit who “groans,” not believers. Second, Romans 8:26 states that the “groans” of the Spirit “cannot be expressed.” The very essence of speaking in tongues is uttering words.
That leaves us with 1 Corinthians 14:4-17 and verse 14 especially: “For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful.” First Corinthians 14:14 distinctly mentions “praying in tongues.” What does this mean? First, studying the context is immensely valuable. First Corinthians chapter 14 is primarily a comparison/contrast of the gift of speaking in tongues and the gift of prophecy. Verses 2-5 make it clear that Paul views prophecy as a gift superior to tongues. At the same time, Paul exclaims the value of tongues and declares that he is glad that he speaks in tongues more than anyone (verse 18).
Acts chapter 2 describes the first occurrence of the gift of tongues. On the day of Pentecost, the apostles spoke in tongues. Acts chapter 2 makes it clear that the apostles were speaking in a human language (Acts 2:6-8). The word translated “tongues” in both Acts chapter 2 and 1 Corinthians chapter 14 is glossa which means “language.” It is the word from which we get our modern English word “glossary.” Speaking in tongues was the ability to speak in a language the speaker does not know, in order to communicate the gospel to someone who does speak that language. In the multicultural area of Corinth, it seems that the gift of tongues was especially valuable and prominent. The Corinthians believers were able to better communicate the gospel and God’s Word as a result of the gift of tongues. However, Paul made it abundantly clear that even in this usage of tongues, it was to be interpreted or “translated” (1 Corinthians 14:13, 27). A Corinthian believer would speak in tongues, proclaiming God’s truth to someone who spoke that language, and then that believer, or another believer in the church, was to interpret what was spoken so that the entire assembly could understand what was said.
What, then, is praying in tongues, and how is it different than speaking in tongues? First Corinthians 14:13-17 indicates that praying in tongues is also to be interpreted. As a result, it seems that praying in tongues was offering a prayer to God. This prayer would minister to someone who spoke that language, but would also need to be interpreted so that the entire body could be edified.
This interpretation does not agree with those who view praying in tongues as a prayer language. This alternate understanding can be summarized as follows: praying in tongues is a personal prayer language between a believer and God (1 Corinthians 13:1) that a believer uses to edify himself (1 Corinthians 14:4). This interpretation is unbiblical for the following reasons: 1) How could praying in tongues be a private prayer language if it is to be interpreted (1 Corinthians 14:13-17)? 2) How could praying in tongues be for self-edification when Scripture says that the spiritual gifts are for the edification of the church, not the self (1 Corinthians 12:7). 3) How can praying in tongues be a private prayer language if the gift of tongues is a “sign to unbelievers” (1 Corinthians 14:22)? 4) The Bible makes it clear that not everyone possesses the gift of tongues (1 Corinthians 12:11, 28-30). How could tongues be a gift for self-edification if not every believer can possess it? Do we not all need to be edified?
Some understand praying in tongues to be a “secret code language” that prevents Satan and his demons from understanding our prayers and thereby gaining an advantage over us. This interpretation is unbiblical for the following reasons: 1) The New Testament consistently describes tongues as a human language. It is unlikely that Satan and his demons are unable to understand human languages. 2) The Bible records countless believers praying in their own language, out loud, with no concern of Satan intercepting the prayer. Even if Satan and/or his demons hear and understand the prayers we pray, they have absolutely no power to prevent God from answering the prayers according to His will. We know that God hears our prayers, and that fact makes it irrelevant whether Satan and his demons hear and understand our prayers.
What do we say, then, about the many Christians who have experienced praying in tongues and find it to be very personally edifying? First, we must base our faith and practice on Scripture, not experience. We must view our experiences in light of Scripture, not interpret Scripture in light of our experiences. Second, many of the cults and world religions also report occurrences of speaking in tongues/praying in tongues. Obviously the Holy Spirit is not gifting these unbelieving individuals. So, it seems that the demons are able to counterfeit the gift of speaking in tongues. This should cause us to compare even more carefully our experiences with Scripture. Third, studies have shown how speaking/praying in tongues can be a learned behavior. Through hearing and observing others speak in tongues, a person can learn the procedure, even subconsciously. This is the most likely explanation for the vast majority of instances of speaking/praying in tongues among Christians. Fourth, the feeling of “self-edification” is natural. The human body produces adrenaline and endorphins when it experiences something new, exciting, emotional, and/or disconnected from rational thought.
Praying in tongues is most definitely an issue on which Christians can respectfully and lovingly agree to disagree. Praying in tongues is not what determines salvation. Praying in tongues is not what separates a mature Christian from an immature Christian. Whether or not there is such a thing as praying in tongues as a personal prayer language is not a fundamental of the Christian faith. So, while we believe the biblical interpretation of praying in tongues leads away from the idea of a private prayer language for personal edification, we also recognize that many who practice such are our brothers and sisters in Christ and are worthy of our love and respect.
http://www.gotquestions.org/praying-in-tongues.html
Thank you all for the respectful way you have approached this topic. I truly believe it glorifies our Lord.
Experience is quite the buzz word of the day – and discernment has been kicked to the curb.
Thoughtful, Bible-believing Christians may differ on this point, but we can all agree that the dispicable displays of the flesh and Satan are to be rejected out of hand whether they occur on “Christian” TV or in centers of worship.
We can all agree that this is an area that calls for extreme discernment and not to be treated casually. If one has this gift it should be practiced in humility and not flaunted. To do so is a disgrace and even blasphemous.
There is a lack of balanced teaching on the subject. Untold numbers of people have been freaked out and turned away from Christianity by weird behaviors, uncontrolled emotions and disgusting fleshly unholy displays. Of course this is not limited to tongues. Slain in the spirit, “holy” laughter, bizarre manifestations,drunk in the spirit,etc.
Actually, we can agree much more on this topic than disagree, maintain the unity and not compromise the bedrock of the faith.
Two thoughts arise from recent posts on this subject;
Jemah,
You said that speaking in tongues; “is not something that can be initiated at will.”
I believe we must be very careful here, because the Bible quite clearly teaches that at no time, will the Holy Spirit over-rule our will in anything, be it speech or behaviour.
One of the first warning signs that some manifestation is NOT the Holy Spirit, is when you hear it said that the people falling down, laughing uncontrollably, or crying, shouting, whatever, can’t help it because the Holy Spirit has overpowered them.
That is a LIE!
The bible is very clear on this point, that we are to exercise self control ay all times, particularly when it comes to anything to do with prayer, praise, or matters of that sort.
If you have no control over speaking in tongues, then I would urge you to seek the Lord about this, because that is NOT how the Bible speaks about the exercising of this gift.
Paul says quite clearly that we must do things in order, which means we must be able to exercise some discernment, restraint if necessary, and to be aware of whether or not to speak out loud (depending on a person with a gift of interpretation being present), or to just pray quietly, or not in tongues at all.
All these require us to be able to initiate, or not, speaking in tongues.
Elmarie,
While the events on the day of Pentecost are as you have described, there is no requirement or caveat given anywhere in the Scripture that the ONLY valid exercise of this gift is for evangelistic purposes.
Paul, writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit Himself, says; “I would that ye all spake in tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.” (1 Cor 14:5) So, it would seem that while this is something to be desired, as are all the gifts (see verse 1), the guiding principle the Holy Spirit gives here is that Love for one another is to be our primary motivation. If we look at verse 26 on, we see that the scripture says quite clearly that when we come together, every one has a psalm, a doctrine, a ‘tongue’, a revelation, an interpretation. Then there is an exhortation to do everything for edification. The next verse says that there should be only two, or at the most, three speeches, in an orderly manner, with an interpretation for each. Then, in v28, there is an instruction to keep silent if no-one is present with an interpretive gift, and to speak to himself and to God. This last is a clear statement that speaking in tongues is not just for preaching the gospel to unbelievers in their own language, but is a permissible part of one’s private prayer time. The statement doesn’t command use of tongues in this area of a Christian’s life, but it seems more to encourage it.
Lower down, v 32 states that the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets, which shows that any idea that we can’t initiate, or control these gifts, but our voices are somehow taken over by the Holy Spirit, is quite wrong and should be corrected in those who hold to such notions. Lovingly, gently, but firmly.
All the excesses and blasphemy of the ‘Toronto Blessing’ and other wickedness would have been avoided (maybe), if the leadership in the churches were following the instructions written here, rather than trying to ‘get the fire’, or whatever they call it.
To finish, although there have been some quite imposing works written to ‘prove’ that all things such as tongues, prophecy, healing, etc, ceased with the close of the Apostolic age, I can’t see the point of Paul’s instructions on any of these things to the church at Corinth, none of whom were Apostles, and even less reason for the Holy Spirit to include it in Scripture. There is no point in giving instruction on how to, or how not to, exercise these gifts of the Spirit, if they are not meant for us today. The Christians of Paul’s day didn’t have the scriptures we do, they had the OT only at that time. These letters were added into the canon of scripture by the Holy Spirit some time after the last Apostle (John) had died. The point I’m making here is that these instructions need never have been added to the Scriptures at all if God only intended for them to be relevant to the first century church. There are many things that are mentioned in the Bible as a matter of history, but are not expounded on because we don’t need to know the details, such as the debauchery that accompanied the worship of Baal and other false gods. We know some things, but God just says don’t worship other gods and that’s all we need to know.
In the case of the gifts of the Spirit, however, there are chapters of instructions about what is acceptable and what is not.
Without a clear statement anywhere in scripture that states that these things were for NT Christians only, I feel that it is safer to say that there is much activity out there that is just plain wrong, but at the same time, there is a scriptural basis for each of the gifts and their operation, as well as extensive instructions on how we should exercise those gifts. Just because large portions of the church are ignoring them, is not justification for saying they’re not for today, any more than hypocrisy in ‘christians’ is a valid reason for unbelievers to spurn the gospel message.
The most important thing to remember is that our goal is to become more Christ-like as we grow in Him, so whether we speak in tongues or not, let’s do everything graciously, lovingly, in an orderly manner, seeking always the edification of our brothers and sisters in Christ.
Shalom, Alan.
Alan
This piece I’m posting pretty much sums it up and clarify my point of view.
“Is cessationism Biblical?”
Answer: Cessationism is the view that the “miracle gifts” of tongues and healing have ceased—that the end of the apostolic age brought about a cessation of the miracles associated with that age. Most cessationists believe that, while God can and still does perform miracles today, the Holy Spirit no longer uses individuals to perform miraculous signs.
The biblical record shows that miracles occurred during particular periods for the specific purpose of authenticating a new message from God. Moses was enabled to perform miracles to authenticate his ministry before Pharaoh (Exodus 4:1-8); Elijah was given miracles to authenticate his ministry before Ahab (1 Kings 17:1; 18:24); the apostles were given miracles to authenticate their ministry before Israel (Acts 4:10, 16).
Jesus’ ministry was also marked by miracles, which the Apostle John calls “signs” (John 2:11). John’s point is that the miracles were proofs of the authenticity of Jesus’ message.
After Jesus’ resurrection, as the Church was being established and the New Testament was being written, the apostles demonstrated “signs” such as tongues and the power to heal. “Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not” (1 Corinthians 14:22, a verse that plainly says the gift was never intended to edify the church).
The Apostle Paul predicted that the gift of tongues would cease (1 Corinthians 13:8). Here are 6 proofs that it has already ceased:
1) The apostles, through whom tongues came, were unique in the history of the church. Once their ministry was accomplished, the need for authenticating signs ceased to exist.
2) The miracle (or sign) gifts are only mentioned in the earliest Epistles, such as 1 Corinthians. Later books, such as Ephesians and Romans, contain detailed passages on the gifts of the Spirit, but the miracle gifts are not mentioned (although Romans does mention the gift of prophecy, the Greek word translated prophecy mean “speaking forth” and does not necessarily include prediction of the future).
3) The gift of tongues was a sign to unbelieving Israel that God’s salvation was now available to other nations. See 1 Corinthians 14:21-22 and Isaiah 28:11-12.
4) Tongues was an inferior gift to prophecy (preaching). Preaching the Word of God edifies believers, whereas tongues does not. Believers are told to seek prophesying over speaking in tongues (1 Corinthians 14:1-3).
5) History indicates that tongues did cease. Tongues are not mentioned at all by the Post-Apostolic Fathers. Other writers such as Justin Martyr, Origen, Chrysostom, and Augustine considered tongues something that happened only in the earliest days of the Church.
6) Current observation confirms that the miracle of tongues has ceased. If the gift were still available today, there would be no need for missionaries to attend language school. Missionaries would be able to travel to any country and speak any language fluently, just as the apostles were able to speak in Acts 2.As for the miracle gift of healing, we see in Scripture that healing was associated with the ministry of Jesus and the apostles (Luke 9:1-2). And we see that as the era of the apostles drew to a close, healing, like tongues, became less frequent. The Apostle Paul, who raised Eutychus from the dead (Acts 20:9-12), did not heal Epaphroditus (Philippians 2:25-27), Trophimus (2 Timothy 4:20), Timothy (1 Timothy 5:23), or even himself (2 Corinthians 12:7-9). The reasons for Paul’s “failures to heal” are 1) the gift was never intended to make every Christian well, but to authenticate apostleship; and 2) the authority of the apostles had been sufficiently proved, making further miracles unnecessary.
The reasons stated above are evidence that the sign gifts have ceased. According to 1 Corinthians 13:13-14:1, we would do well to “pursue love,” the greatest gift of all. If we are to desire gifts, we should desire to speak forth the Word of God, that all may be edified.
http://www.gotquestions.org/cessationism.html
Alan
Quick question.
When did you learn to sing in tonuges?
What age were you?
What church did you attened at the time where you received this gift?
What were you doing at the time when you first spoke in tongues? i.e., explain exaclty what you were doing or didn’t do to get this gift?
Jemah
I cannot agree with you. It clearly says in the Word 1 Corinthians 14:22 (Amplified Bible) 22 Thus [unknown] tongues are meant for a [supernatural] sign, not for believers but for unbelievers [on the point of believing],
Jemha this clearly explains to us that tongues was used for the unbelievers and not for edifying oneself and the church.
In fact it says further that prophecy (inspired preaching and teaching, interpreting the divine will and purpose) is not for unbelievers [on the point of believing] but for believers.
You see I don’t think this is taught by most of the Pastors/Preachers and it is sad to see how these false teachers/prophets are the misleading the sheep. Jemah I do hope and pray you understand my point please let me know.
Jemah
Your term “angelic tongues is in existence today” is troublesome.
I found this explanation and it makes sense. It seems you accept the charismatic view and please forgive me if I am wrong but this is what I understand from your sentence.
Regarding the Calvary Chapel article:
As I mentioned above in my article this was before the time the bible was written. Jews needed signs. We do not need signs as we have the Holy Spirit who abides in us as we believe by faith.
This verse is for Great tribulation for Jews. Not for today. Dominionists use this verse to back up their heresy as they believe the church has replaced Israel.
Is not to teach that we can imitate the language of angels. Rather Paul is simply using hyperbole to make a point. The point he was making that even if he could speak (which he CAN’T) speak the language of angels It would still be useless.
But does NOT provide scripture for this. Can someone people provide scripture for this, because I can not find scripture for singing in tongues, dancing in the spirit, praying to God in tongues be in in church or at home by yourself in private. etc.
Again this refers to an earthly language and this verse ties in with this verse….
Tongues speaking in the church is an earthly language as a sign for an unbeliever. I said this already in my article.
True, until the Word of God came which is Perfect and tongues are no longer needed.
What does the person who prays to God silenty in tongues or sings in tongues at home in private have to say to a fellow brother or sister who has not one single gift?
I was under the impression that we believed and lived by FAITH. Hmmm
Alan
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh noooo nooooo nooooo. What are you saying Alan? If the person thinks he/she knows better than the Holy Spirit because the person wants to speak tongues, then what does that say about the person? If our will superceeds that of the Holy Spirit and the person acquires tongues then the tonuge is NOT from God.
Also if one can turn your tongues on and off like a light switch then there is something wrong as well.
So now this leads me back to my questions I asked you earlier.
How did you attain your gift?
When did you learn to sing in tonuges?
What age were you?
What church did you attened at the time where you received this gift?
What were you doing at the time when you first spoke in tongues? i.e., explain exaclty what you were doing or didn’t do to get this gift?
Please note I am asking you these questions because I want to understand how you came to get this gift. I am not giving you a hard time (yet) LOL ;)
Jesus never places burdens on people. All born again Christians are EQUAL. Not one is better than another. What is extreme discernment? Jesus would NEVER give us such fine line to work with.
Hey all,
I must say that there is MASS confusion under christians with regards to this ‘tongue’ issue…
Clearly this is what you need to do if you still don’t get it:
Pray and ask God to help you understand this ONCE & for all and then go and read Deborah’ post RIGHT AT THE TOP and then read this from Elamrie:
“Is cessationism Biblical?”
Answer: Cessationism is the view that the “miracle gifts” of tongues and healing have ceased—that the end of the apostolic age brought about a cessation of the miracles associated with that age. Most cessationists believe that, while God can and still does perform miracles today, the Holy Spirit no longer uses individuals to perform miraculous signs.
The biblical record shows that miracles occurred during particular periods for the specific purpose of authenticating a new message from God. Moses was enabled to perform miracles to authenticate his ministry before Pharaoh (Exodus 4:1-8); Elijah was given miracles to authenticate his ministry before Ahab (1 Kings 17:1; 18:24); the apostles were given miracles to authenticate their ministry before Israel (Acts 4:10, 16).
Jesus’ ministry was also marked by miracles, which the Apostle John calls “signs” (John 2:11). John’s point is that the miracles were proofs of the authenticity of Jesus’ message.
After Jesus’ resurrection, as the Church was being established and the New Testament was being written, the apostles demonstrated “signs” such as tongues and the power to heal. “Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not” (1 Corinthians 14:22, a verse that plainly says the gift was never intended to edify the church).
The Apostle Paul predicted that the gift of tongues would cease (1 Corinthians 13:8). Here are 6 proofs that it has already ceased:
1) The apostles, through whom tongues came, were unique in the history of the church. Once their ministry was accomplished, the need for authenticating signs ceased to exist.
2) The miracle (or sign) gifts are only mentioned in the earliest Epistles, such as 1 Corinthians. Later books, such as Ephesians and Romans, contain detailed passages on the gifts of the Spirit, but the miracle gifts are not mentioned (although Romans does mention the gift of prophecy, the Greek word translated prophecy mean “speaking forth” and does not necessarily include prediction of the future).
3) The gift of tongues was a sign to unbelieving Israel that God’s salvation was now available to other nations. See 1 Corinthians 14:21-22 and Isaiah 28:11-12.
4) Tongues was an inferior gift to prophecy (preaching). Preaching the Word of God edifies believers, whereas tongues does not. Believers are told to seek prophesying over speaking in tongues (1 Corinthians 14:1-3).
5) History indicates that tongues did cease. Tongues are not mentioned at all by the Post-Apostolic Fathers. Other writers such as Justin Martyr, Origen, Chrysostom, and Augustine considered tongues something that happened only in the earliest days of the Church.
6) Current observation confirms that the miracle of tongues has ceased. If the gift were still available today, there would be no need for missionaries to attend language school. Missionaries would be able to travel to any country and speak any language fluently, just as the apostles were able to speak in Acts 2.As for the miracle gift of healing, we see in Scripture that healing was associated with the ministry of Jesus and the apostles (Luke 9:1-2). And we see that as the era of the apostles drew to a close, healing, like tongues, became less frequent. The Apostle Paul, who raised Eutychus from the dead (Acts 20:9-12), did not heal Epaphroditus (Philippians 2:25-27), Trophimus (2 Timothy 4:20), Timothy (1 Timothy 5:23), or even himself (2 Corinthians 12:7-9). The reasons for Paul’s “failures to heal” are 1) the gift was never intended to make every Christian well, but to authenticate apostleship; and 2) the authority of the apostles had been sufficiently proved, making further miracles unnecessary.
The reasons stated above are evidence that the sign gifts have ceased. According to 1 Corinthians 13:13-14:1, we would do well to “pursue love,” the greatest gift of all. If we are to desire gifts, we should desire to speak forth the Word of God, that all may be edified.
http://www.gotquestions.org/cessationism.html
And then PRAY SOME MORE..! You’ll get it!
Nope. I won’t agree on something that is not biblical and can lead someone off the narrow path that Jesus commanded us to walk on.
Debs,
I thankyou for your comment at the end of your post above; “Please note I am asking you these questions because I want to understand how you came to get this gift. I am not giving you a hard time (yet) LOL ;)”
I think you will know me well enough by now to know that anything I say here is NEVER intended in any way, to be ‘superior’, or judgemental, or patronizing, or…you get my drift. I don’t say much or write much often, because I feel it is better to say nothing at all than to cause offense to a brother or sister. (Causing offense to unbelievers by preaching the gospel, or to false teachers for telling lies in God’s name is not a problem to me. LOL!)
;-)
A few points, not in the order they appear in post above:-
You said this above; “Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh noooo nooooo nooooo. What are you saying Alan? If the person thinks he/she knows better than the Holy Spirit because the person wants to speak tongues, then what does that say about the person? If our will superceeds that of the Holy Spirit and the person acquires tongues then the tonuge is NOT from God.”
As I explained further on that post, 1Cor 14:32 quite clearly states that the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. In other words, when the prophets spoke, they always did so in obedience to the urging of the Holy Spirit, but were NOT forced to do so as taught by some of the pentecostals these days, which they then use to excuse the outlandish behaviour that goes on in their meetings.
That said, Once the GIFT is given, it remains, as Paul urged Timothy to stir up again the gift that he received by the laying on of Paul’s hands. Also, as I pointed out, in 1Cor 14:28, Paul (and by extension the Holy Spirit, because He is inspiring Paul to write these words) tells us to speak to himself and to God.
You also asked when, where, how, etc, I LEARNED to speak in tongues. AH sorry, but if I learned to do so, it wouldn’t be spiritual a gift, would it?
As I said, I am reluctant to speak about this subject, precisely because it leads to debate which can and often does degenerate into two camps, challenging one another’s walk before the Lord.
However, I will tell you that I remember repenting of sinfulness in my life and asking God to forgive me. I was sobbing before the Lord, on my knees and yes, emotionally pretty wretched.
(I would ask those who may feel the need to say; “Ah ha, it was just his emotions that got the better of him.”, to consider that exactly the same argument is used by non-christians to explain away conversion, so it doesn’t really work.)
Anyway, as I prayed on my knees, praising God, I began to speak, then sing in a language I never learned. No-one taught me, urged me, coached me, or anything like that. My family attended a Baptist church, not some holy-roller circus. I can tell you that the experience was as real as the night of my salvation some years before. I have since experienced all kinds of different church services, in all kinds of different settings and I can say that I am the first to say that most of what passes for the operation of spiritual gifts is just not biblically supportable, so I understand the aversion to the whole issue, however, no-one has answered the points I raised above, that there is no logical reason given for why these instructions are included in the New Testament, which has been preserved to this day.
Also, it has been posted here that the gifts were only for the Apostles, which is just not biblically supportable. Timothy wasn’t an Apostle, nor were the members of the church at Corinth, and there is no caveat given in the scripture to say that the gifts are only for Apostles, or for only the time of the Apostles. Yes there is a mention of tongues ceasing in 1 Cor 13: , but read this verse in the context of the whole passage, which includes Ch. 12, 13, and 14, all three of which are dealing with the spiritual gifts and how they are to be exercised and how they must be regarded as lower in importance to love.
The reason Ch 13 is there is to show that in this area, as in all others, all must be done in an attitude of love. For God first of course and for our brothers and sisters in Christ. In fact this whole treatise stands on that principle.
As I said above, the lack of adherence to that principle has lead to pride, self promotion, partiality (looking down on those who don’t speak in tongues, or such like), which has of course lead to unbiblical practices and false teaching, then attributing unbiblical behaviour to the Holy Spirit, which I believe blasphemes the Holy Spirit in a similar manner as the Pharisees did when they attributed the real work of the Holy Spirit to the power of Satan. All these are evidence that the times are short, but not that the gifts have ceased to be operative today. In 1 Cor 13:8-10, Paul says that all these things will cease, including knowledge, but when that which is perfect is come, then these things we only understand in part, will cease. If you are going to say that tongues and prophecies HAVE ceased because of verse 8, then logically, knowledge has ceased also. I hope there are no takers for that idea? because if we can have no knowledge (of the things of God), then we are lost and without hope.
Incidentally, the emerging clowns all say that we cannot know anything about God with any certainty because they don’t regard the Bible as the Word of God and they got that way by taking bits out of context, then taking bits out full-stop, until they end up by saying we can’t know God, just try to work Him out from subjective experience.
Another point made was that the gift of tongues is RESTRICTED to being a sign for unbelievers, which is also not something that can be stated as an absolute.
Once again, 1 Cor 14:28 says to “speak to himself and to God”. There are clearly no unbelievers in view here, listening to the person who follows this directive, so this verse clearly teaches that such a restriction on the exercising of the gift of tongues has no basis in scripture. We must be careful not to add anything to the scripture, nor take it away.
On that note, there is a quote above that says this:-
5) History indicates that tongues did cease. Tongues are not mentioned at all by the Post-Apostolic Fathers. Other writers such as Justin Martyr, Origen, Chrysostom, and Augustine considered tongues something that happened only in the earliest days of the Church.
I’m sorry, but all the names here believed in the same Gnostic heresies that are making their come-back today. They were all quite violently Anti-Semitic also, Chrysostom led bands of ‘Christians’ in raids on Jewish people that resulted in death and destruction easily comparable with the Nazi’s, except that they used swords, not guns. Origen twisted scripture to make it compatible with Greek philosophy and could be credited with first spiritualizing away the promises of God to Israel and making them apply to the church, otherwise known as replacement theology. Justin Martyr and Augustine fit right in with the other two.
I am surprised to find an article mentioning such apostate heretics as authoritative teachers of the Bible being quoted on this site in a positive manner. I have noticed one common thing with all false teachers, heretics, apostates, etc, they invariably practise some kind of anti-semitism, including those who supposedly are pro-Jewish, but teach that the Jews don’t need salvation.
Generally, when I hear people quote these men above, and a number of their contemporaries, the alarm bells start going off very loudly indeed. Please don’t think I’m throwing a tantrum here, but I cannot stress enough the danger that these men’s theologies pose to true believers, so subtle are their false teachings.
I have to go work now, but will be happy to reply to any flaming marshmallow missiles tomorrow. (working N/S)
Blessings to you all in Jesus’ name,
Al.
Alan
I will quote 1 Corinthians 14:22 and 1 Cor 14:28 in context and lets look at what it is said by Matthew Henry’s whole Bible Commentary. This is how I understand it.
1 Corinthians 14:21-25 (Amplified Bible)
21It is written in the Law, By men of strange languages and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people, and not even then will they listen to Me, says the Lord.(A)
22 Thus [unknown] tongues are meant for a [supernatural] sign, not for believers but for unbelievers [on the point of believing], while prophecy (inspired preaching and teaching, interpreting the divine will and purpose) is not for unbelievers [on the point of believing] but for believers.
23 Therefore, if the whole church assembles and all of you speak in [unknown] tongues, and the ungifted and uninitiated or unbelievers come in, will they not say that you are demented?
24 But if all prophesy [giving inspired testimony and interpreting the divine will and purpose] and an unbeliever or untaught outsider comes in, he is told of his sin and reproved and convicted and convinced by all, and his defects and needs are examined (estimated, determined) and he is called to account by all,
25 The secrets of his heart are laid bare; and so, falling on [his] face, he will worship God, declaring that God is among you in very truth.
1 Corinthians 14:26-33 (Amplified Bible)
26 What then, brethren, is [the right course]? When you meet together, each one has a hymn, a teaching, a disclosure of special knowledge or information, an utterance in a [strange] tongue, or an interpretation of it. [But] let everything be constructive and edifying and for the good of all.
27 If some speak in a [strange] tongue, let the number be limited to two or at the most three, and each one [taking his] turn, and let one interpret and explain [what is said].
28 But if there is no one to do the interpreting, let each of them keep still in church and talk to himself and to God.
29 So let two or three prophets speak [those inspired to preach or teach], while the rest pay attention and weigh and discern what is said.
30 But if an inspired revelation comes to another who is sitting by, then let the first one be silent.
31 For in this way you can give testimony [prophesying and thus interpreting the divine will and purpose] one by one, so that all may be instructed and all may be stimulated and encouraged;
32 For the spirits of the prophets (the speakers in tongues) are under the speaker’s control [and subject to being silenced as may be necessary],
33 For He [Who is the source of their prophesying] is not a God of confusion and disorder but of peace and order. As [is the practice] in all the churches of the saints (God’s people),
Hi all (Burning Lamp, Alan, Jemah, Deborah, Elmarie, who did I leave out?)
Most importantly, I would like to loudly echo BL’s sentiments expressed regarding this issue:
This is a subject about which I have strong convictions, some of which I have expressed in minor postings above and also on other threads on the DTW site. However, because I regard this as, potentially, the most divisive issue (sadly) among Christians, I will attempt to refrain from undue elaboration.
Many of the authoritative articles posted above lend further strong evidence that tongues are not for today. The question which repeatedly comes to mind, is what could possibly be the purpose of tongues today, when we have the completed Gospel? This sub-issue has been mentioned in one of the comments above, but the question itself remains unanswered.
Although it may seem honourable or kind for Christians to differ quietly on the subject of speaking in tongues today, I fail to see why this should be so, it being such an enormously divisive issue.
While it is dismissed as being of seemingly little importance by some practitioners, it has by and large been refuted by the majority of documented Christian scholars throughout church history. However, if consensus has been reached in the church as to the position regarding the other Apostolic gifts, does it not stand to reason that the controversy surrounding the least favoured of those gifts is a demonic ploy?
In this regard Lourens said:
Further to that, it would be fair to state that there exists a singular truth regarding this matter, but that the sectarianism is the result of the deception employed in obscuring that truth. If it is widely accepted that the other more ‘important’ Apostolic gifts are extremely rare, if not ceased, today, it seems simply illogical that tongues would have been singled out and maintained for no particular purpose.
If it was God’s intention for us to still speak in tongues today, instructions to this end would be very clear and not condusive to the extreme controversy that it is. God is ultimately practical and the Bible contains the most economically written instructions to Christians in it’s divine pages. If that is an accepted fact, then it is impossible for Christians to simply agree to disagree on this issue which has been the cause of more division and tragic consequences in recent church history than I wish to remember.
Alan said:
While I agree that there have been many historical heretics and that these men are in many respects among them, I strongly feel that this is where the gift of discernment becomes indispensable for the Christian, to avoid their subtle falsehoods. If we were to simply dismiss all the writings of all those who seem to be heretical or have been in error in some way or another, I cannot think of one single teacher/writer whose works could be regarded as safe. Not one. Outside the Bible that is, of course.
God often uses unbelievers to do tasks for the fulfillment of His perfect plan. We must employ discernment in all matters which will enable us to not continually throw the baby out with the bathwater. We far too easily tend to generalize, categorize or ascribe guilt by association. 1 Th 5:21 But test and prove all things (until you can recognize) what is good; (to that) hold fast.
Deborah said:
That is the point, exactly.
My reason for posting this we have just about worked through the Corinthians chapters about tongues :-) But it is the book of Acts that gives us the clarity on the singular purpose of tongues. For those who know this just a good exercise to refresh our memories and for those who did not know please get into reading this little article that I find simple and clear.
Hello all,
Below is a quote from Grant’s post above:-
Firstly, let me say that what Grant is implying here is that even apostates and heretics can speak the truth, which is correct. Even Satan speaks the truth mixed with a tiny bit of lie, to deceive people who would not otherwise be so deceived. Ninety-nine percent truth + one percent lie will do the trick very well, which is the lesson to be learned from the symbolic use of leaven as a metaphor for sin. All leaven was to be purged from houses (tents originally) and the bread was to contain no leaven either.
The problem I have with such statements however, is that it is so easy to place such weight on the teachings of men that we allow them to influence the way we read the Bible, rather than reading our Bible and allowing it to influence the the way we regard the teachings of men. In other words, it’s backwards. All writings, commentaries, preachings, etc can be useful and helpful to Christians, of course, but what we learn from the Holy Spirit as we read God’s Word, is always, and I’ll emphasize it ALWAYS the yardstick by which we measure the truth of what we read or hear from men.
To summarize, I respect the words of men (and women) who have studied much more than I on a particular subject (any subject), but I will not ever allow that respect to colour the way I read the scriptures, which is what is being done by quoting commentaries, etc to explain what the Bible means. How can you be like the Bereans and study the scriptures to see if what the commentary writer says is true, unless you are prepared to dismiss the learned man’s writing if you don’t find the Holy Spirit revealing the same thing to you from the text?
Further down the same post Grant (sorry mate, I’m not picking on you, just replying to your post, but the principle here holds for others who’ve posted too) says the following:-
“While it is dismissed as being of seemingly little importance by some practitioners, it has by and large been refuted by the majority of documented Christian scholars throughout church history. However, if consensus has been reached in the church as to the position regarding the other Apostolic gifts, does it not stand to reason that the controversy surrounding the least favoured of those gifts is a demonic ploy?”
The fact that consensus has been reached in the church is not now, nor ever should be the basis for interpreting scripture. In fact, going on the example given in scripture of the history of the Israelites being a set of lessons for us to learn from, consensus, especially if it is the majority view, should be a warning that the agreed position is wrong, not right. Whenever people use that old chestnut of “Oh, the majority of Christians believe…” I know from what the Holy Spirit has revealed to me from my Bible that the issue being supported by this ‘evidence’ is probably wrong.
I’m sorry folks, but the church fathers, Origen, Augustine, Justin Martyr, John Chrysostom, Eusebious, and a host of others, committed themselves, or encouraged others to commit, such barbaric acts of cruelty on the Jewish brethren of my Lord, that I would sooner swim in a cesspit than allow that their teachings be held in any kind of honour at all, no matter what truth there maybe mixed in with their vile replacement theology and anti-semitic/anti-christ doctrines.
I have read many commentaries and books on many different subjects in my life and the one most valuable lesson I’ve learned in my 40+ years as a Christian is that what I understand when I read the Bible, always believing by faith that the Holy Spirit will lead me into all truth, is to take paramount place over all the words of men that I have read or heard. I will not negotiate on that point, to the point of death.
How can it be otherwise? The Holy Spirit is my teacher and can and will (indeed has already done so, often) discipline me when I go astray. God is a Holy God, a God to be feared with righteous awe, but He is also gracious and kind and I know He will always correct me when I need correction, so I will not allow any teaching of man to colour the way I read God’s Word. Does that mean I don’t question things in my life? Not at all, I constantly hold up my life and my thoughts to the light of the Word, to test them against what I read there. The Bible makes it crystal clear that we are to do that with every aspect of our lives as often as possible. We are told there to let scripture interpret scripture, not to let commentaries, or popular opinion, or church consensus, or the edicts of the NAR, or the Pope, or anyone else influence how we understand what is written in God’s Word.
A lot of the posts that tend toward a cessationist viewpoint, have made statements such as one pointing to the fact that missionaries have to go to school to learn languages.
What does that prove? That the gift of tongues is no longer active, or that these people are not really being called of God to be missionaries?
I have always had trouble believing that God calls someone to be a missionary, then expects that person to fund their own trip with cake stalls, etc, or by begging from various congregations for financial support for the work that God has called them to do.
If God wants someone to be a missionary, whatever their needs are, God will meet them. It’s God’s work they about after all, not their own, nor that of the church that sent them out. Just because we do things backwards nowadays, doesn’t mean that God intends us to do so, but rather shows His graciousness in still blessing missionary work that is carried out very much in the strength of the missionaries, rather than the strength of the Lord.
Actually, the idea that we from the ‘enlightened’ Western world countries have to go to the poor countries to take the gospel to the masses, has led to much that is not biblical in the missionary fields of the world, starting as it does with pride. There are a number of missionary societies that do things differently, they train Christian people in Asia, South America, Africa(?), Eastern Europe, China, and others, to be missionaries to their own people, so there is no need for such language training. However, I have no problem believing, from what I read in the Bible, that God may use the gift of tongues in that way today.
Much has been made of the ‘SIGN’ element here and the same thing is said of miracles, and other spiritual gifts; that they were for a sign to others because they didn’t have the scriptures, but we do have the scriptures, so we no longer need the signs. I find that a little (actually a lot) hard to swallow, because Paul commends the Bereans for their searching of the scriptures to test his words to them. What we call the Old Testament was the Bible for the people of those days, so to say that they needed signs because they didn’t have bibles is incorrect. Also, Jesus rebuked those that asked Him for a sign, because they had already been given all the signs God deemed necessary and still didn’t believe He was the Messiah. Many of that generation were still alive at the time of the events in Acts and even a few would’ve been around at the time Paul wrote to Corinth, so don’t attach too much weight to the horse of ‘signs’. The hyper pentecostal NAR and their ilk all talk up the ‘signs’ angle too. ;-)
The verses where Paul talks of ALL speaking in tongues is referring to them all speaking in tongues at the same time, which of course isn’t edifying to anyone even if they weren’t speaking in tongues. He then goes on to say that tongues should be spoken out once, twice, at the most three times, in an orderly manner, with interpretation following each utterance. This is also evidence that the person speaking has the control over whether or not to speak out in tongues, because the instruction is redundant if the Holy Spirit is the instigator of any utterance in tongues. I’m sure He knows how to do things in order!
Conversely, Paul makes it clear that the people are to exercise restraint in the exercising of their gifts. (Note once again that none of these people were Apostles, so the idea that tongues were only for Apostles is here done away with. Verse 28 says let those who have the gift speak to themselves and to God, which cannot mean anything but what it says; that the use of tongues can be exercised on a personal level. The injunction in the beginning of this verse is against speaking out publicly when there is no-one present to interpret it for the hearers in the congregation, but this latter part of the verse tells the believer to exercise his or her gift in a private fashion. It cannot mean anything else. The following verse gives instruction about the exercising of the gift of prophecy, saying that there should be no more than two or three such utterances and that they should be judged by others present, whether or not they are of the Holy Spirit or from some other source. Verse 32 below that tells us that the prophetic gift is under the control of the person speaking, so as to avoid a situation where many people prophesy at once, again creating confusion. Many times you will hear people such as Rodney Howard Browne say something like; “Don’t think about it, just let the Spirit take control and start speaking, cast off restraint.” which is clearly spoken against in this verse. So, while the Holy Spirit is clearly not someone who we should resist, the idea that therefore such restraint is wrong is shown here to be contrary to the Bible’s teaching on how to conduct yourself if you have such a gift. The final two verses; 39 & 40, say that we should covet (strong word) to prophesy and we should not forbid people to speak in tongues, with the proviso that all things be done decently and in order. In other words, while the Holy Spirit is the one who gives the ability to speak out in tongues or prophecy, the decision on whether or not to do so is always under the control of the person concerned. The Holy Spirit will not compel people to do things which are out of line with these principles and against the over-riding principle of agape love, which seeks the best for everyone else, not the grandstanding of those who have been blessed with such gifts.
Addressing the issue of 1 Cor 13:8, where Paul speaks of these things ceasing, if we read the following verses, we see that Paul says we know in part and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. He continues over the next few verses to expand on that theme, which clearly talks of when Christ returns and brings the perfection we currently yearn for but lack. Of course there will be no need of spiritual gifts for edification, because all will be perfected, including us and our understanding and we will be complete, no longer in need of edification and encouragement, however, agape love will remain, being perfected also. To say that the gifts have ceased already, one must show that that which is perfect has already come according to this verse, which I hope no-one will claim. I know that there are those in the Latter Rain, or Manifest Sons of God cults that say that we will obtain that status before Jesus returns and even that some of them already have arrived at that state of perfection, but this is so obviously anti-scriptural it’s almost not worth the time to point it out. I’d say it’s laughable, but it’s more a matter for tears than laughter as far as I can see.
Sorry for the length of this post, but there is one more point I want to make here, then I’ll speak no more on this subject without invitation. I have learned that you can support just about any idea from scripture if you are determined to do so. In other words, if you have a particular agenda, such as promoting the idea of the Seventh Day Adventists that we experience ‘soul-sleep’ after we die, you can, if you try hard enough, find evidence to support your contention. You have to go against the majority of scriptural references to what happens after we die, but you can still do it. The same goes for many other doctrinal differences. There is an excellent article on this subject by a guy called Dusty Peterson, called “Beware False Balances”. In it he shows that while the majority of scriptural references to a particular issue will teach you what God wants you to know about the subject, there are always one or two verses that will allow someone to believe something different about that same subject.
‘Soul-sleep’ is one such example that is easy to point to. Although the weight of scripture clearly tells us that when we die as believers we go to be the Lord, there are Paul’s mentions of those that have died being ‘asleep’, in the following verses (in no particular order); 1Cor 15:6, 1 Thes 4:13 & 15, 1 Cor 15:51, 1 Thess 4:14. The Seventh Day Adventists use these scriptures to ‘prove’ that ‘soul-sleep’ is a biblical teaching, which I hope we al agree it isn’t. For the sake of brevity I will give no other examples, but I can assure you that they are there for every doctrine.
This begs the question of why would God put those verses there like that and not just make the case an airtight one for what He wants us to believe? The answer lies in the various references to searching for the Truth in the Bible as if one were digging for treasure. Searching diligently, with a love of the truth such as is referred to in 2 Thess 2:10. Why does God want us to receive the love of the truth? Because He identifies Himself with the truth to the extent that Jesus said I am the Truth. Those that don’t love the truth, will be sent a strong delusion so that they will believe a lie. By God no less! The value He puts on truth is so high that He is not going to just parcel it up in a neat package for anyone who is not prepared to expend every effort to find it, but has made it available only to those who will seek diligently, with all their heart. Those who have the same high regard for truth that He has. Those who wish to be lazy and not seek diligently will find in the Bible those things that they wish to find and be led astray, having their ears tickled, but those who are prepared to lay all else aside and earnestly seek for the truth with all their hearts, will find it. We shall know the truth and the truth will set us free.
I will gladly post the URL for the page where you can find Dusty’s article, but not without Deb’s permission. I feel like I may be in for a roasting already! :-)
I leave you with these words from Romans 15;5 & 6; “Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to to Christ Jesus: That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
And from 2 Cor 13:14:- “May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost , be with you all. Amen.”
God bless you all so very richly,
Alan.
Alan
Lots of stuff in your comment I don’t agree with.
You say many Gnostics believed tongues had ceased. True but what does that mean? Augustine believed Jesus was crucified does that now make it incorrect? No, so let’s exclude this argument.
You can’t use Corinthians as an example to say that the gift of tongues is for today. Paul spoke to them for ‘that time’ only – before the Bible had been written. So in context yes, tongues were practiced and the Corinthains were abusing it.
Paul then says these things will cease, along with prophecy once the Word of God is written.
Since then tongues were not heard again until the 1700′s with the French Prophets in Europe and then again in 1906 with 2 prophetesses in a charismatic church. When will tonuges and prophecy be heard again? When the Holy Spirit falls on the Jews again during the trubulation.
All I can say Allan is that I do not know your heart, just as you do not know mine – none of us know eachothers hearts. We can’t convince eachother that there are things in our lives that might or might not be Godly. Only the conviction of the Holy Spirit will lead us to believe which will lead us to get rid of these things through repentance. So I am gonna leave it at that with much love!
I also want to emphasise that fellowship on this blog is not unbreakable. It’s not a club nor is there any gang (Sorry BL just had to use your words – it’s not aimed at you). We speak the TRUTH in LOVE always BECAUSE we CARE, not because we once laughed and now that means we have to remain silent on issues such as this. Lord knows how many people have crossed our path that seemed so nice, yet were far from nice in the end. Then there are those who are dear to our hearts and I will fight with them and get upset with them because of things that will lead them astray and it’s my duty to tell them so – however there does come a time when you have to step back and just pray.
Hi Deb, Thanks for your gracious words above. It is hard is it not to speak contrary to a brother os sister in Christ.
I agree with your words on those who become abusive when challenged about something.
I believe it shows their true nature, because we are called to be teachable, and to esteem one another higher than ourselves and such people as get abusive are obviously not walking in the way of the Lord, at least not while they behave that way.
I believe that our highest priority as Christians is to love God with all our heart and to love our neighbours as ourselves.
We are called also to grow in the Lord, allowing the Holy Spirit to make us more like Christ, to pray like Him, speak like Him, love others like Him.
Jesus said out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks, so when a person speaks cruel words, intending to cause hurt, it is then we see what is in their heart.
I have seen a few of the poisonous posts you have received and I know first hand the hurt it causes when you are accused of being mean, arrogant, self-righteous, and worse, when all you are trying to do is warn people because you love them. The very proof of your love is thrown back in your face and called abuse. It is heartbreaking, I know because it has happened to me also.
I pray God will so richly bless you and your family that such hurts will be soothed by His loving care, as I’m sure you have experienced already. I Praise God for your faithfulness to live according to His ways.
Shalom,
Alan.
Being a Christian for many years has taught me to be wary of contraversial issues that people spend so much time debating about instead of spreading the gospel of God’s salvation.
When something becomes an issue and takes one away from the main theme then it is best prayed about and then left at the foot of the cross and then move on to the purpose of saving men’s souls for the kingdom with the true gospel.It’s a case of getting priorities in order.
I have heard whole sermons preached on issues like tongues or…is it permissable to drink wine…and many other debates that are time wasting and bear no relation to the message of the cross.
Satan loves to get us involved in disputes and deviations that bear no witness to the Saviour dying for our sins and the hope of being born – again.
Michael
Micheal we cannot save men’s souls that is up to God alone. We cannot take God’s work from His hands. We must preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ only and take it to the world. We are told also that other men will come and preach a different Gospel.Galatians 1:7 and Galatians 1:9 and 1 John 2:4. It is so obvious that todays church is growing cold to the true Gospel and men only want to hear that which they see as pleasing and gratifying. 2 Timothy 4:3 (Amplified Bible) 3 For the time is coming when [people] will not tolerate (endure) sound and wholesome instruction, but, having ears itching [for something pleasing and gratifying], they will gather to themselves one teacher after another to a considerable number, chosen to satisfy their own liking and to foster the errors they hold,
I cannot agree with your statement “we must move to the purpose of saving men’s souls for the kingdom with the true gospel”.
The the reason for this article is actually to warn about that in today’s churches people are being mislead to expect that one must be able to speak in tongues it has become a prerequisite in most of these big churches and that is just absurd. There is nothing wrong with discussing the subject as long as we as Christians can do so in love. I for one have learned a great deal about this subject as it took me to the Scriptures where we find only the truth. Thanking every body here for their little bit of input on this subject. We can only watch and pray and test all things to see whether they proceed from God as we are told. 1 John 4:1
[ Test the Spirits ] Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.
Hey Elmarie…you misunderstand what I said “with the true gospel”…that is the ingedient…I was certainly not implying man’s power merely his effort…as we are just instruments and it is God that does the work…it is not “by might,not by power but by my spirit…says the Lord of hosts…Zech 4:6.
You misunderstand me…I agree to what you say…it is just getting our priorities in order…over emphasis on secondary issues get us off the main path if you understand my meaning,thank you sister I know you mean well.
Sorry …”ingredient”…should check my spelling before sending
Michael
Thank you for clearing that up. :-)
I believe there are born again Christians in Pente churches but that said hopefully with time they will come to know the truth, that tongues were earthly languages. I used to take the middle of the road avenue, that tongues were a gift given to some but not for all. With time and visits to Pente churches and more Bible study, I came to the same conclusions in the article. I used to visit Pente churches and in every one, ended up walking out feeling uncomfortable, the tongues always sounded like how it would sound if someone was told to pretend to speak a fake language. I do not think the people are guilty they really believe in it, but with many it’s induced with suggestion. One Pente I used to know would tell me I needed to clear my mind out, and empty it from all distractions and NOT think in Words. I told him that is what they told me when I was a UU Theosophist [Im an ex Catholic as well] before I became a Christian. Meditation techniques, empty your mind-give up control. My reaction was to say FORGET IT!
Hi everyone,I would just like to say one thing, that I would rather die than offend my God in anyway or fall out of His Grace,thank-you for pointing out many valid points, that are not unknown to me, Id rather give everything up than be in error, so I will, and see where the Spirit leads me.the Truth will always prevail at the end.
God bless you all
Biblebeliever
I agree. And I agree too that there are many in these churches that are slowly realising there is something horribly wrong but don’t know where to turn to for help because around ever corner lies more lies and persuasion. But the Holy Spirit within these born again Christians are warning them and they will escape sooner rather than later.
What these churches used to preach is no longer. What was is no longer. And unfortunately born again Christians are a drop in the ocean compared to the wild fire that has spread over people in the church.
Regarding someone who speaks in tongues but it saved, the Holy Spirit will convict them when they learn the truth on the matter and if they are willing to listen to Him they will stop with His help. Some people might not listen at first but sooner than later they will realised something is not right.
One little sin will always lead to another little sin and so on…
Satan will always make sure he convicts you for the opposite of what the Holy Spirit convicts you for. Satan will say, keep the tongues, Holy Spirit will tell you to get rid of them because they serve no purpose.
Speaking to God in English or what ever language you speak makes more sense to me because I know what I am saying. If I am not 100% sure what I am doing in not pleasing God I will abandon it immediately. What does that leave us with I am sure someone will ask. Well it leaves us with reading the Bible :)
Jemah
Thank you. I hope it’s easier for you than me and my earring problem. lol
Michael
You can’t be serious? Tongues speaking today is a very very serious issue along with everything else that can trap a person and lead them off the narrow path.
Precisely…With respect..you misunderstand my context…that is why it is best ignored…and buried…it is a smokescreen or red-herring that the devil uses to take us off the real message of the scriptures.
Michael
I get what you’re saying but these things can’t be ignored – they need to be spoken about. Many people, millions are under the impression that it’s correct. Because you understand it does not mean others do. It’s like saying, lets not speak about false teachers – they are red herrings.
Be aware that God is not mocked!He is the same yesterday, today, and forever! He never changes, glory to God! Jesus plainly tells in scripture that a Helper would be sent and He was! He said that with the Holy Spirit we would do even mightier things than He! The reason this is foolishness to people is because the Spirit of God is not in them to discern the spiritual things of God! God said to not forbid the “speaking in tongues” which is not an earthly language like some believe. Praying in the spirit builds up the inner man! Also,God says we know not how to pray as we ought. Praying with only human wisdom is like limiting God to our thoughts. Why would we do that? His thoughts are higher than our thoughts and His ways are higher than our ways! Why question God’s integrity? He sent the Holy Spirit to help us pray among other things! The baptisim of the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in “tongues” is necessary to being enabled to live the true christian life! The Holy Spirit helps us to pray! If we say it’s just another earthly language you are still limiting God to human wisdom! We ought not ever do that! We are to always go into everything with prayers and supplication always praying in the Spirit “praying in tongues” Christians ought not start arguments over scripture or condem anyone but correct with kindness. Some are blinded to the deep spiritual things of God because of the rejection of the Holy Spirit! I pray that all who get before God in prayer and ask Him for enlightenment on this subject!He will tell you! It’s up to you if you will open your heart to be attentive to what He tells you! Don’t take us “tongu talkers” word for it! Take God’s Word as Truth!Jesus is coming back very soon! Open your heart to the truth before the tribulation and don’t reject the gifts of God! Be enlighted to God’s Word, not man’s! Peace to all who listen to what the Spirit of God is saying on this!
christina
May I ask you which church you attend?
Christina
I have possibly answered your type of comment a hundred times. But for the sake of helping you out, I will answer these questions again.
1) When Jesus said we would go greater things than He, He was speaking about spreading the Gospel, NOT doing GREATER miracles than HIM. If you want to be better than Jesus Christ then there is a serious problem.
2) It’s clear from SCRIPTURE ABOVE (Used from the Bible) you know that Book that contains Words DIRECTLY FROM GOD that TONGUES HAS STOPPED. Yes God is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow but He SAID that tongues have ceased therefore they have stopped.
3) Jesus said he would send the Holy Spirit as our helper and the Holy Spirit abides in born again Christians. This is true. So what’s your point? This does not make tongues valid for today.
4) Pentecost was a once off occurrence. The next time it happens again is during the tribulation and the Holy Spirit will overcome Jews and they will prophecy and dream and have visions as per the completing of the prophecy of Joel 2 and Acts. Open your BIBLE and study it for yourself Christina and stop slurping up false teachers garbage so they can pass off a false spirit as the Holy Spirit.
4) Of course God’s wisdom is greater than ours, but He has clearly said that tongues has STOPPED so what part of your wisdom that GOD GAVE YOU to understand His commandments are you not wanting to listen too?
5) Christians are to TEST, REBUKE, EXTORT those who preach false teaching. Just like Paul rebuked the Corinthian church for doing EXACTLY what the church you attend is doing.
6) TESTING as commanded by the Word of God as per 1 John 4:1-6 is NOT mocking God, nor is it blaspheming the Holy Spirit. I think the next person that says this to me I will automatically trash their comments. In fact Christina you mock God by NOT reading your BIBLE. I guaranteed you, you did not even read my article because if you did you would NOT be speaking the nonsense you are speaking. If you read my article you would notice there are verses FROM THE BIBLE (that you choose to IGNORE).
7) You are blinded Christina.
8) The Holy Spirit helps us to pray when we can’t. Is this audible? NO. READ YOUR BIBLE CHRISTINA.
Next time you comment, I request you quote scripture to back up each and every single one of your arguments in CONTEXT. If you can’t do this, then you have a problem Christina because God tells us that we need to study His Word to find ourselves approved. Have you His stamp of approval? I’ll leave that up to you to decided.
9) Jesus Christ is surely coming back soon to rapture His church. You have a couple of years left to start reading your Bible Christina and getting your life in order. Let us pray you do not loose your life tonight.
I simply meant get God’s priorities in order…subjective issues without clarity become “camels”…the Lord Jesus Christ admonished the pharisees…”you strain at gnats but swallow camels”.
Tongues used to be a huge issue with me…the way the charismatics emphasized it…but when I saw the unholiness in the churches and worldliness of the members therein it became as clear as daylight that this is not of God’s spirit.
Logically I began to read the Gospels carefully with a sincere heart and it became obvious that if tongues was what the charismatics believe to endow them to live holy and perfect lives then a) Why did Jesus not emphasize this…indeed He never even mentioned it and b) why is it that those who insist on it as a quick fix to lead holy and sinless lives…live the very opposite…this is real hypocrisy…and Jesus attacked hypocrisy with such zeal and c)the final straw came when I discovered the blatant lies that seemed common in charismatic leaders like Benny Hinn and his gang and locally the Angus Buchan story…very personal knowledge.
When you get to these sort of cross-roads in your life you are tired of superficiality…tired of inconsistencies,insincerity and you discover there is absolutely no integrity left in this so-called universal church. This is the biggest mockery of God.
So I buried tongues once and for all and got on with the business of loving God and my fellowman. I also began to realise that the walk with God is not easy but indeed a pilgrims progress and the more I saught God out the more He revealed my sinfulness and I have become totally dependant on Him…pride started to be edged away and I am free from all this non-sense. I read very few Christian books nowadays as most of them I do not trust. On the otherhand I read the scriptures daily as they are the only lamp I trust. TV preachers I never entertain.
Michael
I understand.
Michael
Thank you for sharing with us. The gate is narrow and the Word also says and few are those who find it. The Amplified Bible calls it contracted by pressure and straitened and compressed .
Matthew 7:13-15 (Amplified Bible)
13 Enter through the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and spacious and broad is the way that leads away to destruction, and many are those who are entering through it.
14 But the gate is narrow (contracted [a]by pressure) and the way is straitened and compressed that leads away to life, and few are those who find it.(A)
15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you dressed as sheep, but inside they are devouring wolves.(B)
Thanks Deborah, yes there are many in those churches knowing something is off. When I left the local Calvary Chapel {I really am a fundamentalist Christian but got desperate for Christian fellowship since there are few like me here}some families admitted to me in the church, they were staying even knowing stuff was off, because they said to me “Where else are we going to go?” There is a price to be paid for leaving false churches, which I believe one is to do in obedience to God, but some people have made the choice, to stay, [not saying I agree] but understand what leads them there, having some fellowship, and thinking of children they want raised in a church.
They don’t know where to go. I was in a decent fundie church…but here there really is nowhere, for the discerning Christian to go. Some remote possibilities are 50 miles away but not everyone has health or money to go that far.
I believe the Holy Spirit is warning many of them even if they are not acting on it. Even a newly saved believer I witnessed to told me the churches here were so bad, he didnt know where to go. It is very sad, this place is empty even of home fellowships that can be found out about.
I believe Christians are coming out of churches in general and know several in my position.
Believe like you, with some the Holy Spirit will convict them. I know a lady who was saved and got out of the Charismatic movement: He will tell his people.
I have considered choices, that went against Bible, and had to be convicted. One thing that can be sin for me is secular TV shows and movies, and sometimes even fiction books–that are full of wicked things–[and getting worse] I love to read. The other day, I didnt put one down and kept reading though at other times have put them down. Some of the fiction even innocent looking on outside is getting scary!
One little sin will lead to another and another. We all need to listen to God. When I left Calvary Chapel, I knew the music was bad, knew the sermons were neo-evangelical fluff, but actually fought God over it, saying “I can’t be without fellowship”, that went on for acouple weeks and then knew I had to do His will.
But yes it applies in many things in life and in churches.
I agree about speaking to God in language you can understand. Being told odd stuff about opening my mind and emptying it in prayer so the “language of angels” could enter it freaked me out. I discerned no difference from what I was told in the UU, and in occult meditation.
Christians need to be told to never do anything they feel unsure of, there are many out there who will use emotion and more to sell false things. Yes go read the Bible instead :)
BB
Sorry did not get to read your blog, I will look at it today. I got carried away with other things and lost track of time…
thank you Debs! I believe this is specially for someone like me? LOL! c
C
Which part?
D, i was referring to the little icons (I think that is what they’re called?) that you’ve put a-top the comment box for a short while… and now they’re gone, and I have to use my head again to think how to make things bold, etc. all the “extra’s” – lol!
C
Ahhhh those, yeah, sorry, I had to take them away. They caused all sorts of conflict with my website code ‘sniffs’.
To do bold. < b > kljfdjfskj < / b > but don’t use spaces. test it, if you make a mess I will fix it from my side and them tell you what you did wrong.
The following video is very helpful in understanding the gifts of tongues, prophecy and knowledge and why they ceased.
Speaking In Tongues Part A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi6fIUpvZUI
God bless,
Mick
[EDITED - Hateful commets are not welcome.]
[EDITED - Hateful comments are not welcome.]
Even Paul nand Peter argued about dietary laws. To assume that a false teaching is a false gospel is ludicrous. To misunderstand some scripture is a fcat of life for all of us. To demande perfection of understanding is NOT Christian. Paul had several conflicts about the gospel with the other disciples.There has to be one doctrine. Not one denomination on this earth agree’s with another on all doctrine. No one. Even churches in the same denominations disagree with each other. You coulodn’t get a Methodist to sit beside a Lutheran because of slight differences in theology. We have to be careful about being absolute right about interpretations. WE have divided ourselvews over silly matters. Paul told us to have one doctrine. The gifts and other stuff is NOT doctrine. To suggest that anyone is not Christian because they agree or diaagree on smaller matters is itself a sin. WE must all agree about who Jeusu was and what HE did for us and how we must adhrer to His truth. But other than that we must be forgiving about the minor misunderstandinds of scripture. Thank you..
Please give me your Scriptural references for Paul arguing with Peter about dietary laws.
Furthermore, Zeus (Jeusu, Jesus etc) never did anything for us but Yashua did.
= Church advertsise fake healings….